How did CLimate Change Cospiracies emerge?
Best insight from top research papers
Climate change conspiracies emerged due to the prevalence of conspiracy theories among individuals, particularly Disbelievers of climate change, as highlighted in a study analyzing a large Twitter corpus . These conspiracy theories were found to be more popular among Disbelievers, who shared messages containing conspiracy theory-related keywords. The emergence of these conspiracies is intertwined with the ongoing public debate over global climate change, where different discourse coalitions, such as the 'advocacy discourse coalition' and the 'scepticism discourse coalition,' present conflicting positions on climate change . Additionally, the representations of climate change in various discursive formations, from scientific to governmental frameworks, have influenced the discourse surrounding climate change, leading to the exclusion of certain stakeholders and alternative discourses .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
Open access•Posted Content | Climate change conspiracies emerged on social media, predominantly shared by Disbelievers of climate change. Not all conspiracy theories are equally popular, impacting climate change communication strategies. |
01 Jan 2015 | Not addressed in the paper. |
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
01 Jan 2013 2 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
Related Questions
How Climate fiction narrated climate change thesis?5 answersClimate fiction, also known as cli-fi, presents climate change as its central theme, aiming to engage readers in environmental issues through fictional narratives. These narratives often explore the relationship between personal and planetary scales, emphasizing the impact of climate change on individuals. Ecofeminist readings of cli-fi highlight a critique of mainstream narratives for their perceived lack of urgency in addressing climate change and their focus on future generations rather than immediate action. Additionally, Arabic climate fiction, like the novel "2022" by Ghassān Shibārū, serves a didactic purpose by raising awareness about global warming and climate change through fictional storytelling. By intertwining fictional characters with environmental crises, climate fiction prompts readers to reflect on the implications of climate change and potentially inspires action against it.
Is Climate change real ?4 answersClimate change is real. The science is clear that climate change is happening, and it is a true reality that has been marked since the middle of the last century. Working scientists deal with the science reality of climate change every day. The effects of climate change on biotic interactions and ecosystem services have been studied and documented. The prevalence of counterclaims by climate-sceptic think tanks does not change the reality of climate change. The profound uncertainty of abrupt climate change warrants careful reflection and prudent preparation.
How does weirdness impact climate change?5 answersWeirdness does not seem to have a direct impact on climate change. The main actors in the history of climate change are committees, and no seminal papers or scientific giants have emerged. However, climate change does have various impacts on the world. Large nations continue burning fossil fuels, while small developing nations are most vulnerable to climate change. Climate change exposes more of the global population to frequent and severe extreme weather events, but these changes have not consistently motivated changes in opinions or behavior related to climate change. Myths and misconceptions continue to poison the debate over climate change mitigation and adaptation. The total energy produced by humanity disrupts the thermal balance of the planet and causes climate change, which can slow down the progress of civilization.
Is climate change a conspiracy?5 answersClimate change conspiracy theories are prevalent, particularly among those who deny or disbelieve in climate change. These theories are often shared on social media platforms, with disbelievers being the primary contributors. While there is scientific consensus on the reality of anthropogenic climate change, some individuals oppose climate change policies due to ideological reasons or a belief that the scientific consensus is a hoax. Climate change conspiracy beliefs have been found to have negative correlations with acceptance of climate science, trust, pro-environmental concern, behavioral intentions, and policy support. These beliefs may also have implications for mental health, although there is currently limited literature on this topic. Climate change conspiracy theories are motivated by a desire to deny or minimize the threat of climate change and are more politically loaded compared to other conspiracy theories.
Are misinformation on climate change spread on social media?5 answersMisinformation on climate change is spread on social media platforms. The characteristics of this misinformation vary, with posts concerning environmental and health impact, science and technology, and referencing non-specific authority sources being more likely to be misinformation. Disinformation about climate change is often spread by politicians, organizations, and anonymous agencies, with misleading and fabricated content being the most common types. The spread of misinformation is facilitated by the existing social rewards and punishments on social media platforms, such as 'likes' and 'dislikes', which are dissociated from the veracity of the information shared. Correcting others on social media is a strategy used to combat the spreading of misinformation, driven by climate change-related anger and political environmental activism. Efforts to mitigate misinformation about climate change require joint efforts from activists, media practitioners, and governments.
Is climate change a hoax?5 answersClimate change is not a hoax, but there are individuals and groups who deny its existence and spread misinformation about it. These deniers often accuse climate scientists of engaging in a deliberate hoax or scam, funded by certain fossil fuel companies and propagated by conservative media outlets and think tanks. However, research shows that these accusations are part of a broader discourse aimed at vilifying the other side and exacerbating group polarization. The belief in climate change as a hoax is not based on concrete evidence or scientific facts, but rather on conspiracy theories and ideological biases. The overwhelming consensus among climate scientists is that climate change is real and primarily caused by human activities. Therefore, it is important to critically evaluate the sources of information and rely on scientific evidence when forming opinions about climate change.