scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

How do scientists identify genes responsible for toxin production? 


Best insight from top research papers

Scientists identify genes responsible for toxin production through various methods. One approach is the use of transcriptomics, which involves analyzing the expression of genes in different tissues. For example, Firneno et al. used comparative transcriptomics to uncover potential toxin synthesizing genes and pathways in North American true toads . Lv et al. sequenced the transcriptomes of different tissues in the Asiatic toad and constructed a gene co-expression network to identify co-expressed genes involved in toxin production . Another method is the screening of specific genes associated with toxin biosynthesis. Schembri et al. identified putative polyketide synthases (PKSs) and peptide synthetases (PSs) genes in Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, which were directly linked to the production of the toxin cylindrospermopsin . Additionally, PCR can be used to detect the presence of toxin genes. Barbash described the use of PCR to assess the safety of probiotic strains by detecting genes encoding bacterial toxins . These methods provide valuable insights into the genetic regulation of toxin production and help in understanding the mechanisms behind toxin synthesis.

Answers from top 4 papers

More filters
Papers (4)Insight
Scientists identify genes responsible for toxin production by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method to detect the presence of toxin genes.
The scientists in the paper identified genes responsible for toxin production in the cyanobacterium Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii by using PCR and degenerate primers to identify putative polyketide synthases (PKSs) and peptide synthetases (PSs) genes.
The scientists in the provided paper identified genes responsible for toxin production by sequencing the transcriptomes of toxin-producing tissues and constructing a gene co-expression network. They also performed comparative genomic analysis to identify expanded gene families associated with toxin production.
Scientists identify genes responsible for toxin production by using comparative transcriptomics to uncover potential toxin synthesizing genes and pathways. They also explore patterns of relative gene expression and possible protein-protein interactions to determine the genes and/or pathways involved in toxin synthesis.

Related Questions

What are the specific environmental toxins that have been linked to cardiovascular disease?5 answersExposure to nonessential metals such as lead, cadmium, and arsenic has been linked to cardiovascular disease. Other environmental toxins that have been associated with cardiovascular disease include particulate matter, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and organic solvents. Heavy metals like lead, mercury, and arsenic have also been linked to hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Additionally, chronic consumption of alcohol and exposure to styrene have been associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease. Exposure to particulate matter in diesel exhaust and urban air has also been shown to contribute to cardiovascular disease and mortality.
What are the specific environmental toxins that have been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease?4 answersExposure to nonessential metals such as lead, cadmium, and arsenic has been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Additionally, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from various sources including industrial solvents, automobile exhaust, and personal care products have also been associated with cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, cyanotoxins produced by bloom-forming cyanobacteria have been found to have negative effects on the cardiovascular system.
What are toxins?5 answersToxins are biologically active substances produced by various living organisms such as bacteria, fungi, plants, and animals. They have a wide range of molecular structures and target different receptors involved in physiological processes. Toxins are selected during evolution to have disabling or lethal effects, and they exhibit high affinities and selectivity. They can act as deadly poisons but also have potential therapeutic applications. Toxins can be used as tools to study cellular processes due to their specificity for cell surface and intracellular targets. They can be derived from different sources, including venomous and hematophagous animals, and can be composed of proteins and peptides. Some toxins have been successfully used in the development of therapeutic agents for cardiovascular diseases. Certain pathogenic bacteria produce toxins that are responsible for severe diseases in humans and animals. These toxins can act individually or in combination to promote the disease.
What are the different methods for identifying the genes responsible for secondary metabolite production?5 answersThere are several methods for identifying the genes responsible for secondary metabolite production. One method is PCR-based methods, which have been used effectively to amplify genes associated with secondary metabolite biosynthesis. Another method is genome mining and bioinformatics, which can be used to predict secondary metabolites and potential pharmaceuticals. Additionally, the combination of various molecular and bioinformatics tools can be used to identify biosynthesis genes. RNA-seq analysis can also be used to reveal the expression of transcripts related to secondary metabolite biosynthesis. In silico tools, such as SMURF, antiSMASH, PRISM, and GRAPE, can be used to identify biosynthetic gene clusters in various genomes. These methods provide valuable insights into the genes and enzymes involved in secondary metabolite production.
Why do sugars inhibit bacterial toxin production?5 answersSugars inhibit bacterial toxin production due to their effect on bacterial growth and the chemical properties of different types of sugars. High levels of sugars, such as glucose, do not support toxin production by psychrotrophic Bacillus cereus, despite promoting bacterial growth. The antimicrobial properties of sugars are not solely dependent on their water activity, but also on other chemical factors, which vary depending on the type of sugar used. Studies have shown that the addition of sugars, even at high concentrations, does not prevent the growth of certain bacteria, such as B. botulinus, and the formation of its toxin. The inhibitory effect of sugars on toxin production may be due to the osmotic stress they impose on bacteria, as well as other chemical interactions that hinder bacterial growth and toxin formation.
How do recombinant toxins compare to supernatants in terms of pathogenicity?1 answersRecombinant toxins have been shown to exhibit higher cytotoxicity and increased glucosyltransferase activity compared to native toxins. The recombinant toxin A from Clostridium difficile was found to be about two times more cytotoxic and had a 10-fold increased glucosyltransferase activity compared to the native toxin. However, the recombinant toxin A did not exhibit the transferase-independent effect of releasing cytochrome c from isolated mitochondria, which was observed with the classically purified toxin A. In terms of Subtilase toxins, all three variants, including recombinant subunits, were found to be toxic to Vero cells. The recombinant AeDNV, which had the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin peptides introduced into its genome, showed significantly higher and faster pathogenic activity against Aedes albopictus larvae compared to the wild-type viruses. Therefore, recombinant toxins can exhibit increased pathogenicity compared to native toxins or wild-type viruses.