Search or ask a question

How does applying correct grammar affect academic performance?

Top-down parsing

Parser combinator

Simple LR parser

Corrective feedback

Best insight from top research papers

Applying correct grammar has a positive effect on academic performance. Studies have shown that using automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) tools like Grammarly can significantly improve students' writing accuracy . The use of Grammarly in EFL writing classes has been found to be effective in developing writing skills and increasing students' writing performance . Additionally, research has shown that the traditional grammatical method of teaching, which emphasizes correct grammar, can lead to higher mean scores in language proficiency tests compared to the direct method . Therefore, it can be concluded that having a strong grasp of grammar and using tools like Grammarly can enhance academic performance by improving writing accuracy and language proficiency.

Answers from top 4 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (4)	Insight
Open access•Journal Article•DOI The impact of direct and traditional grammar translation methods on the student’s performance at secondary level: an empirical evidence from balochistan 30 Jun 2022-Pakistan journal of educational research	The provided paper does not directly address the impact of applying correct grammar on academic performance. The paper focuses on comparing the Direct Method and the Grammar-Translation Method in terms of students' performance and language proficiency.
Open access•Proceedings Article•DOI The effect of correcting grammatical errors on parse probabilities Joachim Wagner, Jennifer Foster - Show less +1 more 07 Oct 2009 17 Citations	The provided paper does not discuss the effect of applying correct grammar on academic performance.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI The impact of automated written corrective feedback on efl learners’ academic writing accuracy Abdulaziz B Sanosi 02 Oct 2022-Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes	The paper does not directly address the impact of applying correct grammar on academic performance. The paper focuses on the impact of using Grammarly, an automated writing assistant, on students' academic writing accuracy.
Proceedings Article•DOI The Effectiveness of Using Grammarly to Improve Students' Writing Skills Hui-Wen Huang, Zehui Li, Linda Taylor - Show less +2 more 22 May 2020 6 Citations	The provided paper does not directly address the impact of applying correct grammar on academic performance. The paper focuses on the effectiveness of using Grammarly in improving students' writing skills.

My columns

Related Questions

What are the impact of Grammarly on students' writing performance?5 answersGrammarly has shown positive impacts on students' writing performance. Students perceive Grammarly as beneficial for identifying and correcting grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors, enhancing paraphrasing skills, improving vocabulary, and making error correction more accessible. However, its effectiveness in reformulating sentences, especially converting passive voice to active voice, is limited for undergraduate students. Research on eleventh-grade students indicates a significant improvement in writing quality, particularly in grammatical accuracy, capitalization, spelling, and punctuation, after using Grammarly. Additionally, a study involving SMK Bakti Mandiri students found that Grammarly led to enhanced writing abilities, with students showing improvement in scores and meeting the Minimum Mastery Criterion in English lessons. Overall, Grammarly as an AI tool has positively influenced students' writing skills and performance.

How does proper communication and languange affect academic performance of students?5 answersProper communication and language proficiency significantly impact students' academic performance. Research indicates that language proficiency plays a crucial role in students' test scores, especially in Business, Science, Mathematics. Additionally, teachers' language skills, particularly in writing and speaking, positively correlate with students' academic achievements at the secondary level. Furthermore, a study on English language proficiency and academic performance in higher education institutions found a strong positive relationship between language proficiency and academic success, emphasizing the importance of English proficiency for better academic outcomes. These findings underscore the essential role of effective communication and language skills in enhancing students' educational achievements across various subjects and educational levels.

Grammarly on writing skills and performance?5 answersUsing Grammarly has shown positive impacts on writing skills and performance among EFL students. Studies have revealed that integrating Grammarly in writing classes led to a significant improvement in students' writing performance over time, with students expressing satisfaction with the AI-based writing evaluation program. Additionally, research on students' writing performance using Grammarly highlighted common errors such as confused prepositions, missing commas, and redundant indefinite articles, emphasizing the importance of continuous writing practice to enhance grammatical accuracy. These findings underscore the effectiveness of Grammarly in aiding students in developing their writing skills and reducing the teaching load for instructors, making it a valuable tool in the EFL classroom.

How effective is Grammarly in improving writing skills?5 answersGrammarly has been found to be effective in improving writing skills. Several studies have shown that Grammarly can significantly enhance students' writing quality in terms of grammatical accuracy, capitalization, spelling, and punctuation. It has been observed that students' writing abilities improved after using Grammarly, with higher scores and percentages of improvement in their writing performance. Students have reported positive perceptions of using Grammarly, stating that it helps identify errors, enhances paraphrasing skills, corrects errors anytime and anywhere, and improves vocabulary. Additionally, the use of Grammarly in EFL writing classes has been found to be effective in developing writing skills and reducing teaching load for teachers. However, it is noted that Grammarly's effectiveness is limited in reformulating sentences, particularly in converting passive voice into active voice. Overall, Grammarly has shown promise in improving writing skills, but future versions should incorporate advanced paraphrasing capabilities to enhance its effectiveness.

How does using Grammarly affect writing performance?5 answersUsing Grammarly has been found to have a significant positive effect on writing performance. Studies conducted in various contexts have shown that Grammarly helps students improve their writing abilities, learn grammar rules, and enhance their overall writing quality. The use of Grammarly in EFL writing classes has been found to be effective in developing writing skills and reducing the teaching load for teachers. Additionally, Grammarly has been shown to improve students' grammatical accuracy, capitalization, spelling, and punctuation, leading to enhanced writing quality. Students have also reported positive perceptions of using Grammarly, finding it helpful in identifying and correcting writing errors, avoiding plagiarism, and increasing their confidence in writing. Overall, the research suggests that Grammarly is a valuable tool for enhancing writing performance and improving the accuracy and quality of written work.

How does grammar enhance the learning competences of students?5 answersEnhancing learners' grammar competence improves their communication skills. The effectiveness of different grammar teaching techniques in achieving this goal is a subject of debate. Research has shown that using grammar consciousness-raising tasks is more effective than conventional methods in improving students' understanding and use of target grammar features. Additionally, the use of learning aids, such as the Omygram learning chart, has been found to significantly increase students' achievement in English grammar. Technology, such as Grammarly, can also aid students' self-directed learning in L2 writing by educating them on the benefits of using the tool and encouraging self-evaluation of their progress. Overall, incorporating grammar teaching techniques that promote consciousness-raising and the use of learning aids can enhance students' grammar competence and improve their overall learning outcomes.

See what other people are reading

What is the connection between trait anxiety and second language writing anxiety?

Trait anxiety, which refers to a stable personality characteristic involving the tendency to perceive situations as threatening, is closely related to second language writing anxiety. Research indicates that individuals with high trait anxiety levels are more likely to experience heightened levels of second language writing anxiety, impacting their writing performance. Moreover, trait anxiety can influence the type of writing strategies employed, such as avoidance behavior, in response to writing tasks. Preservice English teachers with high trait anxiety levels tend to provide more direct and comprehensive written corrective feedback due to their anxiety-related concerns and perceptions. Therefore, trait anxiety plays a significant role in shaping individuals' experiences with second language writing anxiety and their writing behaviors.How effective is the ProvWrit program in improving ESL learners' writing skills?

The effectiveness of programs aimed at enhancing ESL learners' writing skills is evident in various research studies. For instance, the ProvWrit program, which focuses on peer response and collaborative learning, has shown positive outcomes. Studies have demonstrated that trained peer response can lead to significant improvements in students' writing quality, with a focus on meaning changes over surface-level revisions. Additionally, utilizing implicit written corrective feedback (WCF) by instructors has been found to enhance ESL learners' writing skills and receive positive perceptions from students. Moreover, incorporating project-based blended learning programs has been shown to effectively develop EFL writing skills and reduce apprehension among students. These findings collectively suggest that programs like ProvWrit can be highly effective in improving ESL learners' writing abilities.What are the current research trends on the use of raters in assessing L2 writing?

Current research trends on the use of raters in assessing L2 writing are multifaceted, focusing on the personal attributes of raters, the impact of test-takers' profiles on scoring, the assessment of critical thinking through writing, the evolution of assessment methods, the comparison of peer and teacher ratings, the analysis of written corrective feedback, classroom-based research, the use of inter-rater discourse for reflective practice, and the assessment of oral proficiency development. Studies have explored how the rating experience of L2 raters affects their evaluation of writing tasks, revealing that experienced and novice raters differ in their references to rating rubrics, particularly in language use, mechanics of writing, and organization. Research has also examined how raters' perceptions of test-takers' speech profiles influence scoring, indicating that pronunciation and lexical grammar categories significantly affect raters' scoring behaviors. The assessment of critical thinking in L2 writing has been identified as a challenging area, with raters focusing on task achievement, content relevance, and logicality as key criteria. Technological innovations and the adoption of qualitative methods have broadened the scope of L2 assessment research, allowing for a deeper understanding of the role of assessment in teaching and learning. Comparisons between peer and teacher ratings under different assessment conditions have highlighted variations in severity and consistency, emphasizing the need for careful planning in peer assessment. The field has also seen a surge in research on written corrective feedback, with a focus on empirical studies and interdisciplinary approaches. Classroom-based research has provided insights into students' learning, teaching practices, and assessment feedback, while the analysis of inter-rater discourse has been proposed as a method for supporting reflective practice in L2 assessment. Finally, studies on oral proficiency assessment have shown that different types of scales can effectively detect changes in L2 oral proficiency over time. These trends underscore a growing interest in understanding the complexities of rater behavior, the impact of assessment practices on learning, and the development of more effective assessment methods in L2 writing.How does individual differences affect writing?

Individual differences play a crucial role in writing, impacting various aspects of the writing process. Factors such as language aptitude, working memory, motivation, self-efficacy, self-regulation, and anxiety influence L2 writing outcomes. Research highlights that individual differences in reading experience significantly predict reading behavior, with readers exposed to more text showing faster and more accurate comprehension, particularly for sentence types encountered through written language. In the realm of second language writing and corrective feedback, cognitive, conative, and affective individual difference factors are increasingly recognized as significant but often overlooked aspects that affect L2 writing processes and outcomes. Understanding these individual differences is essential for educators to tailor writing instruction effectively and enhance students' writing abilities.What are the three main theories that explain Second Language Writing Anxiety?

The three main theories that explain Second Language Writing Anxiety (SLWA) are epistemic beliefs (EBs), writing self-efficacy (WSE), and cognitive, somatic, and avoidance anxiety dimensions. EBs and WSE play significant roles in predicting SLWA. Students with higher EBs tend to experience greater SLWA, while those with higher WSE tend to have lower SLWA. Additionally, cognitive anxiety is a prominent dimension of SLWA, affecting highly proficient preservice teachers who prefer direct and comprehensive feedback due to their anxiety levels. Furthermore, factors such as poor understanding of writing concepts, linguistic obstacles, insufficient writing skill practice, and time restrictions contribute to SLWA among university students in EFL contexts. These theories and dimensions provide insights into the complexities of SLWA and its impact on language learners.What theories explain Second Language Writing Anxiety?

Second Language Writing Anxiety is explained by various theories in the research papers provided. The deficit hypothesis is one such theory that suggests anxiety in writing is related to students' lack of writing skills, with better students experiencing less anxiety. Additionally, perfectionism, specifically socially prescribed perfectionism, is highlighted as a significant predictor of writing anxiety and achievement in foreign language writing. High expectations from lecturers are identified as a factor causing cognitive anxiety in writing in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, leading to writing anxiety. Furthermore, the impact of writing anxiety on preservice English teachers' written corrective feedback practices is explored, with highly anxious teachers showing a preference for direct and comprehensive feedback due to their anxiety levels.The influence of natural language processing technology on student evaluation?

The influence of natural language processing (NLP) technology on student evaluation is multifaceted and transformative, impacting various aspects of educational assessment and feedback mechanisms. NLP's application in medical education, for instance, has led to the development of virtual case systems like AIteach, which significantly improve medical students' clinical thinking abilities by simulating real-case scenarios and providing multi-dimensional evaluations based on their responses. Similarly, in language learning, AI-programmed automated writing evaluation tools like Pigai have been used to provide feedback on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) submissions, demonstrating a dynamic process where students evolve from mechanical to more considered responses to feedback. The predictive modeling capabilities of NLP have been employed to assist in the review of narrative feedback in medical education, streamlining the competency review process by identifying performance-predictive topics within student feedback. This technology also offers solutions for identifying unprofessional faculty behaviors through sentiment analysis and keyword identification in narrative evaluations, thereby enhancing the quality of faculty review processes. Beyond evaluation, NLP-driven conversational agents have been shown to increase response quality and enjoyment levels in course evaluations, suggesting a broader application for engaging students in feedback processes. In the context of e-learning, semi-automated analysis of feedback using text mining and machine learning methods has demonstrated high user satisfaction, indicating NLP's potential to efficiently process large volumes of qualitative feedback. The technology's role in analyzing student feedback data extends to identifying areas for improvement in educational services, with applications in sentiment analysis, text summarization, and topic modeling. Furthermore, NLP has facilitated the semi-automated assessment of transfer credits in post-secondary education, aligning closely with expert human judgments. Lastly, NLP's educational applications encourage critical thinking and ethical considerations among students, highlighting its role in fostering a multidisciplinary interest in AI. In summary, NLP technology significantly influences student evaluation by enhancing feedback mechanisms, streamlining review processes, and fostering interactive and critical engagement with educational content.Is corrective feedback effective in written output?

Corrective feedback in written output has shown effectiveness in improving grammatical accuracy and overall language development. Various types of feedback, such as direct, indirect, and metalinguistic, have been found to yield similar effect sizes in enhancing L2 writers' accuracy over time. Additionally, studies suggest that the use of comparators alongside feedback can lead to improvements in lexical complexity and accuracy of new texts. However, while focused corrective feedback can enhance mastery of specific language rules, it may negatively impact other aspects of language learning, especially with explicit metalinguistic explanations. Overall, the literature supports the notion that corrective feedback plays a crucial role in language classrooms, aiding both teachers and learners in assessing performance and fostering development.What is the impact of excluding articles not written in English on the overall findings of a study?

Excluding articles not written in English (NEL) from studies can introduce biases. While some studies suggest that the exclusion of non-English speakers (NES) from research has increased over time, research indicates that the impact of excluding languages other than English (LOE) on systematic reviews may not significantly affect summary treatment effects. However, the precision of pooled estimates can improve with the inclusion of LOE trials. Including unpublished or grey literature data in meta-analyses may lead to more accurate assessments of intervention effects, as missing outcome data can bias results. Therefore, while excluding NEL articles may not drastically alter findings, considering low-cost translation options and including a diverse range of studies can enhance the comprehensiveness and accuracy of research outcomes.What are the psychological benefits of receiving feedback and evaluation during a campaign?

Receiving feedback and evaluation during a campaign offers various psychological benefits. Effective feedback, as per organizational psychology practices, can establish a comfortable communication flow, aiding in learning and development. Immediate feedback during psychological treatment for smoking has shown to enhance adherence and initial abstinence. Evaluation in communication campaigns is crucial for understanding effectiveness and improving programs. Feedback in sender-receiver deception games influences lying behavior through anticipation and actual feedback effects. The anticipation of feedback, whether positive or negative, can deter lying, while negative feedback can lead honest individuals to react defensively. Overall, feedback and evaluation play vital roles in motivation, behavior change, and program improvement during campaigns.How does the use of computer assisted tools impact the effectiveness of language learning?

The integration of computer-assisted tools significantly enhances language learning effectiveness. These tools, such as AI language learning programs and digital resources, offer personalized learning experiences, increase learning speed, and provide opportunities for collaborative decision-making and critical thinking. University administrators are increasingly embracing digital tools in language education, aiming to replace traditional methods with more efficient technological solutions. Additionally, the use of AI tools in language learning presents opportunities for future advancements, including integrating virtual and augmented reality technologies and improving adaptive learning algorithms. Overall, the utilization of computer-assisted tools in language learning not only improves proficiency but also introduces learners to diverse cultures and enhances their overall learning experience.