scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

How does coastal development affect the nesting habits and survival rates of sea turtles? 


Best insight from top research papers

Coastal development significantly impacts sea turtles' nesting habits and survival rates. Urbanization and beach nourishment activities can lead to vegetation loss, altered sand temperatures, and reduced nesting beach availability . Plastic pollution on nesting beaches poses a threat to sea turtle embryos and hatchlings, affecting their survival odds and emergence patterns . Additionally, coastal squeeze due to anthropogenic structures like sea walls reduces beach area, limiting suitable nesting sites for marine turtles . Erosion and changes in beach dynamics further exacerbate the challenges faced by sea turtles, necessitating proper management and conservation strategies to safeguard their nesting habitats . Overall, understanding and mitigating the impacts of coastal development are crucial for ensuring the resilience and survival of sea turtles.

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
Coastal development, like urbanization, impacts sea turtle nesting grounds by increasing sand temperatures. Vegetation buffers high temperatures, crucial for olive ridley sea turtle resilience to global warming.
Coastal urbanization contributes to plastic pollution, impacting sea turtle hatchlings' emergence patterns and survival rates by reducing successful emergence probability and disrupting synchronized hatching, increasing predation risk.
Coastal development leads to coastal erosion, impacting sea turtle nesting habitats. Monitoring sand spits and beach dynamics is crucial to mitigate erosion and ensure sea turtle nesting survival.
Coastal development, particularly hard anthropogenic structures, reduces beach availability for marine turtles, impacting nesting habits. Prioritizing beaches with low development can help mitigate future coastal squeeze risks.
Beach nourishment for coastal development can impact nesting sea turtles through construction, dredging, lighting, and habitat alterations, requiring mitigation measures to minimize negative effects on survival rates.

Related Questions

How does climate change affect turtle survival rate in oceans?4 answersClimate change impacts turtle survival rates in oceans through various mechanisms. Rising temperatures lead to female-biased sex ratios, higher embryo mortality, and reduced hatching success, affecting species like sea turtles. Extreme weather events, such as cold snaps, can cause acute cold-stun events, resulting in juvenile turtle mortality, with long-term survival rates varying based on severity. The environment influences foraging behavior, migratory patterns, and breeding success of marine turtles, with potential positive and negative effects due to climate change. Additionally, warming temperatures directly impact all life stages of turtles, including sex determination and growth rates, potentially leading to significant shifts in sex ratios. Conservation efforts, such as protecting nesting beaches and increasing research on critical knowledge gaps, are crucial to enhancing marine turtle populations' resilience to climate change.
Application of sustainable marine economy in coastal areas?5 answersThe sustainable marine economy in coastal areas involves implementing green economy initiatives to promote social solidarity. This is crucial due to the diverse uses of coastal zones leading to conflicts and habitat depletion. To achieve sustainable development, mechanisms like market-based and command-and-control environmental regulations are essential, influencing marine green economic efficiency in China. Overcoming distortions like underpricing marine capital and underfunding conservation is vital for greening the ocean economy, with a proposed global agreement focusing on phasing out subsidies and implementing market-based incentives. Integrated Coastal Zone Management, coupled with ecosystem services analysis, is key for sustainable blue economy development in vulnerable coastal ecosystems. By integrating these approaches, coastal areas can harness their marine resources while ensuring environmental protection and social well-being.
How do turtle nesting sites contribute to the overall ecological balance and biodiversity of coastal ecosystems?4 answersTurtle nesting sites contribute to the overall ecological balance and biodiversity of coastal ecosystems in several ways. These sites provide essential habitats for sea turtles during their reproductive cycle, supporting the survival and growth of turtle populations. The presence of sea turtles in these habitats helps maintain the health of coastal ecosystems by regulating the populations of their prey species and controlling the growth of seagrass and algae. Additionally, sea turtle nesting sites serve as important foraging grounds for other marine biodiversity, including fish and invertebrates, contributing to the overall biodiversity of coastal areas. Protecting and managing these nesting sites is crucial for the conservation of sea turtles and the preservation of coastal ecosystems and their associated services.
What affects sea turtle growth?4 answersSea turtle growth is influenced by various factors. The growth rates of green turtles, hawksbills, and loggerheads in the West Atlantic have declined, possibly due to an ecological regime shift caused by the 1997/1998 El Nino Southern Oscillation and warming temperatures. Hawksbill growth rates also vary regionally, with slower growth observed in Texas compared to Florida, potentially due to differences in diet and foraging patterns. Kemp's ridley sea turtles in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coasts experienced reduced growth rates starting in 2012, possibly due to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and climate variability. Sand moisture content during incubation can affect postemergence growth rates of loggerhead sea turtles, with drier nests resulting in slower growth. Climate indices, such as El Nino and sea surface temperatures, have significant relationships with hawksbill growth rates, indicating the influence of climate change on growth dynamics.
How does coastal erosion affect species?5 answersCoastal erosion has significant impacts on species. The loss of coastal habitats, such as mangroves, wetlands, seagrasses, and coral reefs, due to erosion threatens the survival of many marine species. Climate change-induced coastal erosion, particularly from extreme meteorological events like typhoons, can challenge the recovery and survival of coastal plant species. Coastal erosion alters the natural processes that sustain beaches and coasts, leading to changes in beach shape and structure, which can have long-term impacts on species and their habitats. The topography of coastlines, including bays and headlands, influences the distribution of indigenous and invasive species, with bays favoring greater mussel cover. Changes in coastal ecosystems caused by erosion, such as shoreline retreat, increased salinity, and wetland loss, can displace and restructure coastal species further inland.
Energetics of Turtle Nesting Behavior in Coastal Environments?4 answersTurtle nesting behavior in coastal environments involves various energetic processes. Turtle embryos consume the yolk deposited in the egg during incubation, and the residual yolk is absorbed after hatching to provide energy for nest escape and early growth. The process of nest escape can be facilitated by interactions between nest mates, reducing individual energy expenditure. Coastal habitats, which are important for sea turtle nesting, can be impacted by storms and restoration projects, affecting nesting success. Habitat loss due to human-related processes and rising sea levels can also impact nesting behavior and hatchling production. Understanding the energetic costs and impacts of nesting behavior in coastal environments is crucial for conservation efforts and the recovery of sea turtle populations.

See what other people are reading

How to improve public awareness of ocean plastic pollution in Australia?
5 answers
To enhance public awareness of ocean plastic pollution in Australia, targeted strategies are essential. Studies show that factors like socio-economic status, site type, and land use influence litter distribution, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions. Public concern about human health impacts of marine plastic pollution is high, indicating a receptive audience for awareness campaigns. Additionally, research highlights the importance of education and advocacy to inspire behavioral change and reduce single-use plastic consumption. Understanding public attitudes is crucial; while Australians view plastics as a serious environmental issue, many do not translate concern into action, placing responsibility on industry and government for reducing plastic use. Therefore, a multi-faceted approach involving targeted communication, education, and policy changes is vital to effectively raise awareness and drive action against ocean plastic pollution in Australia.
What is the current global plastic production?
7 answers
The current global plastic production is a topic of significant environmental concern, reflecting a dramatic increase over the past decades. As of the latest data, annual plastic production has reached approximately 450 million tons. This figure represents a substantial growth from earlier years, where production was reported at over 360 million tons in 2018, and even earlier, 311 million tons in 2014. The historical perspective shows an exponential growth from the 1950s when annual production was around 1.7 million tons, escalating to 299 million tons by 2013, and further to 367 million tons by 2020. This growth trajectory is underscored by the increase from 1.5 million tons in 1950 to 359 million tons in 2018, and the report of more than 405 million tons in recent years. The significance of this production volume is multifaceted, impacting not just the environment but also the socio-economic landscape. The vast majority of this production is derived from petro-based polymer technology, which has been the dominant method despite the looming threat of fossil fuel depletion. The environmental implications of such massive production are profound, with only a fraction of the produced plastics being recycled, and a significant portion ending up in landfills or the natural environment. This scenario presents a stark challenge for waste management and environmental sustainability, highlighting the urgent need for a shift towards more sustainable practices and policies to mitigate the environmental impact of plastic production and consumption.
Which industries consume the most amount of plastic?
10 answers
The consumption of plastics spans across various industries, each utilizing plastics for different applications due to their versatile properties. The packaging industry emerges as the primary consumer of plastics, significantly driven by the demand for lightweight, flexible, and durable materials for packaging purposes. This sector accounted for approximately 34% of all plastics used in the US and 37% in Europe, highlighting its dominant position in plastic consumption. Similarly, the construction industry is identified as a major user of plastics, leveraging their non-corrosive, soft, flexible, and high heat and electrical insulation features. Plastics in construction are primarily used for applications such as insulation, piping, and as components in sustainable building design. The apparel industry also stands out for its substantial contribution to plastic use, particularly through the production and disposal of synthetic clothing. It is estimated that the apparel industry generated 9.2 million tons of plastic pollution in 2019, which accounts for a significant portion of the overall plastic pollution footprint. This is further supported by the identification of the clothing and fabric manufacturing industries as the most plastic-intensive sectors, emphasizing the role of synthetic fibers in these industries. Moreover, the automotive, aerospace, and electronics industries are notable consumers of polyolefins, the most widely used plastics, due to their low production cost and wide range of applications. The versatility of plastics is also evident in their application in the textile industry, not only in clothing but in the manufacturing of essential fibers and the entire production process of textile products. In addition to these sectors, the building materials industry has seen a forecasted growth in plastics consumption, driven by the material's superior performance characteristics over traditional materials in various applications, including insulation, piping, and fittings. Lastly, the rapid increase in plastic production, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has highlighted the unregulated demand for plastic-made consumer products across multiple industries, further contributing to environmental contamination. In summary, the packaging, construction, apparel, automotive, aerospace, electronics, and building materials industries are among the most significant consumers of plastics, each contributing to the demand for this material in unique ways.
How bioplastics are broken down into microplastics?
5 answers
Bioplastics can be broken down into microplastics through various mechanisms involving microorganisms. Studies have isolated bacteria and fungi from landfills that can degrade microplastics like polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene, with Bacillus paramycoides showing significant degradation capabilities. Microorganisms like algae, fungi, and bacteria produce enzymes that play a crucial role in breaking down microplastics, converting their complex polymeric structure into simpler forms. Additionally, a protocol utilizing microorganisms without prior domestication has shown efficient degradation of polyolefin microplastics, with complete degradation achieved in 33 days. Furthermore, a novel approach using engineered strains capable of utilizing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) as a sole carbon source has demonstrated successful biodegradation of PET particles, highlighting the potential of whole-cell biocatalysts for microplastic degradation.
Emerging threats and vulnerabilities for Indian ocean and sri lanka?
5 answers
Emerging threats and vulnerabilities for the Indian Ocean and Sri Lanka include a range of challenges. These encompass maritime security issues like piracy, terrorism, and environmental degradation. Additionally, the small-scale fisheries sector in Sri Lanka faces vulnerabilities due to geopolitical changes, conflicts, and post-war development impacting livelihoods. Climate change and phosphorus scarcity pose significant risks to agriculture in Sri Lanka, affecting farmers' productivity and poverty levels. Furthermore, the recent MV Xpress-Pearl ship disaster has highlighted environmental security threats, with plastic pollution impacting marine life along the coast of Sri Lanka. Moreover, harmful algae species in the Indian Ocean around Sri Lanka pose risks to water quality and marine ecosystems, emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring and regulation of maritime activities.
How would a ban on single-use plastic effect Florida?
7 answers
A ban on single-use plastics in Florida could have multifaceted effects, considering the state's unique environmental, economic, and social landscapes. Firstly, such a ban could contribute to mitigating the environmental degradation of Florida's renowned beaches, which are crucial to the state's economy and cultural identity. The disappearance of these beaches due to pollution, including plastic waste, poses a significant threat to the state's tourism and the real estate market along the coastline. However, the effectiveness of a single-use plastics ban in significantly reducing marine pollution may be limited. While it could decrease plastic marine pollution in the EU by 5.5%, this translates to a mere 0.06% decrease globally, suggesting that the impact on a localized scale like Florida might be similarly modest. Moreover, the environmental concerns associated with single-use plastics are not solely about their contribution to marine pollution but also their role in broader ecological and human health issues. Single-use plastics, constituting about half of plastic waste, contribute to wildlife mortalities and the proliferation of microplastics, affecting ecosystems and potentially human health. Transitioning away from single-use plastics could alleviate some of these pressures, but the challenge lies in managing the waste and finding sustainable alternatives. Alternatives like paper or biodegradable plastics have their environmental impacts, often requiring careful consideration to ensure they do not exacerbate other environmental issues. Economically, a ban could stimulate innovation in sustainable product design and waste management practices, aligning with the need to redesign plastic products for recyclability and improve recovery systems. However, the immediate economic impact on businesses, particularly small vendors and consumers accustomed to the convenience of single-use plastics, could be significant. Adjustments to new materials and practices may incur costs and require public acceptance and behavioral changes. Socially, the ban could face resistance from various stakeholders, including the trading community and citizens accustomed to the convenience of single-use plastics. Effective implementation would require comprehensive public engagement strategies, education, and possibly incentives to encourage a shift towards more sustainable consumption patterns. Additionally, the global push towards banning single-use plastics and increasing recycling efforts indicates a broader trend that Florida could be part of, potentially positioning the state as a leader in environmental sustainability and innovation in the face of plastic pollution challenges. In summary, while a ban on single-use plastics in Florida could have positive environmental impacts and align with global sustainability trends, its effectiveness and broader implications would depend on careful implementation, the availability of sustainable alternatives, and the engagement of all stakeholders in the transition process.
Why should Florida enact a ban on single use plastic?
6 answers
Florida should consider enacting a ban on single-use plastics due to a multitude of environmental, economic, and health reasons, as highlighted by recent research. The state's economy, heavily reliant on its world-famous beaches, faces a significant threat from rising sea levels, with the loss of tourist economy and property taxes generated by beach-front real estate being a major concern. Single-use plastics, which constitute about half of plastic waste, exacerbate this issue by contributing to harmful environmental consequences, especially for marine ecosystems, potentially impacting human health as well. Despite the integral role of plastics in society, their management remains a challenge, with the accumulation rate of plastic waste accelerating and effective waste management strategies being crucial yet unaddressed. Moreover, the environmental impact of single-use plastics extends beyond marine pollution to include wildlife mortalities resulting from ingestion and entanglement. Bans on single-use plastics, while not a universal solution, have been shown to decrease plastic marine pollution, albeit with some trade-offs such as increased emissions contributing to marine aquatic toxicity. The pervasive use of single-use plastics not only raises environmental concerns but also impacts the economy, affecting both consumers and vendors. Research suggests that addressing the issue of single-use plastics requires a holistic approach, involving the redesign of plastic products to make them recyclable and the implementation of more efficient recovery systems. Additionally, the food and beverage industry's role in reducing the usage of single-use plastic packaging is highlighted as crucial for environmental sustainability. Legislative approaches to reduce plastic pollution have varied globally, with some countries implementing taxes or bans on plastic bags to encourage reduced plastic use. Given these considerations, a ban on single-use plastics in Florida could serve as a critical step towards mitigating the environmental impact of plastic pollution, protecting the state's economy, and safeguarding public health.
How have cities in florida addressed single-use plastic use?
4 answers
Cities in Florida have been grappling with the environmental challenges posed by single-use plastics, particularly in the face of rising sea levels threatening the state's economy and natural beauty. The approach to addressing single-use plastic use involves a combination of policy measures, educational programs, and innovative solutions aimed at reducing consumption and mitigating environmental impacts. Policy measures have been a significant focus, with some cities implementing bans or restrictions on single-use plastics to curb their use. This aligns with broader observations that policymakers are increasingly taking action against single-use plastics due to their harmful environmental consequences, especially in marine ecosystems. Moreover, the proposal of a hybrid of upstream and downstream taxes on single-use plastics in Florida suggests a financial strategy to not only deter overuse but also generate funds for disaster mitigation related to environmental degradation. Educational programs aimed at raising awareness about the impacts of plastic pollution and promoting sustainable consumption habits have also been part of the strategy. Studies have shown that community behavior plays a crucial role in managing single-use plastic bottle consumption, indicating the importance of education in mitigating plastic pollution. Innovative solutions to replace single-use plastics with environmentally friendly alternatives are being explored. For instance, the development of plant-based resins that mimic the properties of plastics offers a durable, biodegradable, and recyclable option, demonstrating a shift towards sustainable materials. Additionally, engaging the food and beverage industry in reducing the usage of single-use plastic packaging is crucial, as this sector significantly contributes to plastic waste. Efforts to address single-use plastic use in Florida also involve understanding the social practices surrounding plastic consumption and exploring collaborative networks to facilitate the transition towards a circular economy, where the focus is on reuse and sustainable material management. These multifaceted approaches reflect a comprehensive strategy to tackle the single-use plastic problem, emphasizing policy, education, innovation, and collaboration.
Why did some Florida cities ban single-use plastic?
4 answers
The decision by some Florida cities to ban single-use plastic is rooted in a multifaceted understanding of the environmental, economic, and health impacts of plastic pollution, as well as the global and local challenges posed by rising sea levels and the need for sustainable waste management practices. The pervasive use of single-use plastics has been identified as a major environmental concern due to its slow degradation rate, leading to harmful consequences for marine ecosystems and potentially human health, as highlighted by Pearson, Khare, and Tantawi. This concern is compounded by the fact that less than 10% of plastics are recycled, with the majority ending up in landfills, incinerated, or abandoned, further exacerbating wildlife mortalities and the fragmentation into microplastics and nanoplastics, which pose significant ecosystem and human health risks. The urgency of addressing plastic pollution is particularly acute in Florida, where the state's economy and culture are deeply intertwined with its world-famous beaches. Rising sea levels threaten not only these beaches but also the state's economic foundation, prompting a need for innovative funding mechanisms for mitigation efforts, such as taxes on single-use plastics. Moreover, the global shift towards banning single-use plastics, as governments recognize the need to protect the environment from plastic marine pollution, underscores the importance of such measures. Efforts to find sustainable and environmentally friendly alternatives to single-use plastics, including the development of plant-based resins and the encouragement of recycling, reflect a broader recognition of the need for comprehensive waste management strategies. The call for a redesign of plastic products to make them inherently recyclable and the implementation of the 5Rs—redesign, reduce, reuse, recover, recycle—further emphasizes the collective responsibility of industry, consumers, and government in addressing plastic pollution. In summary, the ban on single-use plastics by some Florida cities is a response to the environmental and economic threats posed by plastic pollution, the challenges of waste management, and the global imperative for sustainable practices. These actions are informed by a growing body of research and policy analysis that advocates for comprehensive solutions to the plastic waste problem.
Why would a ban on single-use plastic negatively harm Americans?
6 answers
A ban on single-use plastics, while aimed at mitigating environmental pollution, could inadvertently harm Americans in several ways. Firstly, single-use plastics play a critical role in medical facilities by providing essential protection from infection through items like gowns, syringes, and gloves. The sudden removal of these plastics without viable alternatives could compromise hygiene and safety standards in healthcare settings, especially during pandemics where the risk of transmission through reusable items has been a concern, albeit the specific risk from reusable bags to SARS-CoV-2 transmission requires further scrutiny. Moreover, the economic impact of such a ban cannot be overlooked. The plastics industry is a significant contributor to the American economy, supporting numerous jobs. A ban could lead to job losses and economic instability for communities reliant on this sector. The American Chemistry Council's push for advanced recycling technologies suggests that the industry is exploring sustainable solutions, indicating that a complete ban might prematurely disrupt economic activities without giving time for the development and adoption of alternative recycling methods. Additionally, while the intention behind single-use plastic bans is to reduce environmental pollution, alternative materials may not always be less harmful. Life cycle assessments have shown that alternatives to single-use plastics, such as single-use non-plastic items, could increase emissions contributing to marine aquatic toxicity, suggesting that the environmental benefits of a ban might not be as significant as expected. Furthermore, the bans could destabilize essential economic and social arrangements in marginalized communities, highlighting the need for a nuanced approach that considers the socio-economic impacts alongside environmental goals. The global shift in waste plastic management, exemplified by China's import ban, has already had far-reaching effects, pushing countries to reconsider their waste management strategies. This indicates a complex international landscape where unilateral bans could have unintended global repercussions, including the displacement of plastic waste to countries with less capacity to manage it sustainably. In summary, while the environmental intentions behind banning single-use plastics are commendable, the potential negative impacts on American healthcare, economy, and even the environment itself, due to the complexities of alternative materials, suggest that a more comprehensive and balanced approach is necessary. This approach should include investments in recycling technologies, careful consideration of alternative materials, and policies that address the broader spectrum of plastic use and waste management.
Why doesn't the United States have alternatives to single-use plastic?
4 answers
The United States does have alternatives to single-use plastics, but the adoption and effectiveness of these alternatives are influenced by a variety of factors. Innovations in sustainable and environmentally friendly single-use plastic alternatives are being developed, emphasizing the need for joint participation from governments, enterprises, and the public to address the issue of single-use plastic waste. Despite this, the sensory experience and consumer acceptance of alternatives, such as different materials for straws, have been mixed, with some alternatives providing inferior sensory experiences compared to traditional plastic. The challenge is compounded by the fact that less than 10% of plastics are recycled in the U.S., with single-use plastics constituting about half of plastic waste, highlighting the need for more effective waste management and sustainability practices. Although there is a growing trend towards banning single-use plastics, the debate continues regarding the optimal policy solutions, suggesting that a comprehensive approach addressing the entire plastic value chain is necessary. Legislative efforts vary, with some countries implementing taxes or bans on plastic bags, a move the U.S. has been slow to adopt on a national level due to strong advocacy from the plastics industry. The environmental impact of single-use plastics, particularly in food packaging, has been significant, driving research into sustainable and environmentally friendly alternatives. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on reusable alternatives have shown that they can offset their environmental impacts if used sufficiently, although this is highly dependent on consumer behavior. The need to redesign plastic products for inherent recyclability and improve waste recovery systems has been emphasized, requiring participation from all sectors. The lack of effective policies specifically targeting single-use plastics and microbeads has been identified as a contributing factor to the ongoing plastic pollution problem. Finally, despite awareness of the environmental damage caused by single-use plastics, convenience often prevails, leading to continued use among consumers, including college students.