What is the reliability of the latest adaptation of this scale as reported in Souilm's (2023) study?5 answersThe reliability of the latest adaptation of a scale can be determined by various methods such as Cronbach Alpha and Composite Reliability coefficient. In the study by Alp and Oral Kara, the reliability of the adapted Vaccine Hesitancy Scale to Turkish culture was tested using McDonald's Omega and Cronbach Alpha methods, indicating that the scale was a reliable measurement tool. Similarly, in the study by Karsantik and Yağci, the Adaptation to Curriculum Change Scale for Teachers was found to have a Cronbach Alpha coefficient of .84 and .86, demonstrating its reliability in measuring teachers' adaptation to curriculum change. Therefore, based on the information from these studies, it can be inferred that the reliability of the latest adaptation of a scale, as reported in Souilm's (2023) study, was likely assessed using similar methods and found to be reliable.
How reliable are resilience measures such as the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale (DARS)?4 answersThe reliability of resilience measures, such as the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale (DARS), can vary based on the specific scale being used. Studies have shown that various resilience scales demonstrate good reliability. For instance, the Turkish version of the Disaster Response Self-Efficacy Scale (DRSES) exhibited high reliability with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.94. Similarly, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in the Iranian context was found to be reliable and valid, with good internal consistency and strong measurement invariance for both men and women. Additionally, the Georgian version of the 10-item CD-RISC demonstrated adequate reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87, indicating satisfactory validity as an instrument to measure resilience in Georgian youth. These findings collectively suggest that resilience measures like the DARS can be reliable tools for assessing resilience in various populations.
How reliable are resilience measures such as Connor-Davidson Resiience Scale and the Disaster Adaptation and reslience scale?5 answersThe Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) has been shown to be a reliable measure of resilience in various populations, with good internal consistency and validity. The CD-RISC has demonstrated solid psychometric properties, including high internal consistency and good reliability, making it a valuable tool for assessing resilience. Additionally, the CD-RISC has been successfully adapted and validated in different cultural contexts, such as in Latvia, Iran, and Georgia, further supporting its reliability and validity as a measure of resilience. However, the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale was not specifically mentioned in the provided contexts, so its reliability in comparison to the CD-RISC cannot be directly assessed based on the available data.
What are the dimensions of measuring food system resilience at different scales?5 answersFood system resilience can be measured at different scales by considering multiple dimensions. At the field scale, resilience can be assessed by evaluating the use of diverse crop varieties, livestock breeds, and forage species, as well as the promotion of ecosystem functions. At the farm scale, resilience can be measured by examining the diversification of crops and livestock, as well as the implementation of adaptive approaches in response to perturbations. Resilience at regional and global scales can be evaluated by coordinating and implementing resilience approaches among farms, providing advice to farmers, and conducting targeted research. Additionally, the diversity of components, the degree of connectivity between components, and the level of decision-making autonomy within the food system can serve as indicators of resilience. By considering these dimensions, the resilience of food systems can be assessed and strategies can be developed to enhance their ability to withstand environmental and socio-economic challenges.
What is the best scale for climate adaptation strategies?5 answersClimate adaptation strategies are most effective at a local scale. Local scale adaptation allows for a bottom-up approach to addressing the challenges posed by climate change. It has been found that many municipalities have implemented or are developing climate change adaptation strategies. These strategies often include measures rooted in nature-based solutions and green infrastructure. However, community-based adaptation is a concept that is not well-known or undervalued by most municipalities. Therefore, the best scale for climate adaptation strategies is at the local level, where municipalities can tailor their approaches to the specific needs and characteristics of their communities.
How disaster resilience measure?5 answersDisaster resilience is measured using quantitative, indicator-based assessments that combine various indicators of performance into a single composite index. These assessments take into account factors such as social vulnerability, coping/adaptive capacity, and the implementation of disaster risk reduction frameworks. Methodological choices, such as normalization and aggregation methods, can influence the rankings of resilience measures. Static measures have limitations in capturing the dynamic nature of resilience, and there is a need to develop data-driven, dynamical complex systems models of disaster resilience. Project management concepts and frameworks can be applied to measure disaster resilience, considering factors such as level of recovery, speed of recovery, and loss minimization. An improved approach for measuring system resilience should provide consistency and flexibility across different contexts. Urban resilience can be measured using comprehensive assessments of physical, social, economic, institutional, and environmental components.