How does the lack of knowledge affect the management of non-timber forest products (NTFPs)?
Best insight from top research papers
The lack of knowledge significantly impacts the management of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in various ways. Studies reveal that indigenous peoples (IPs) have better knowledge about edible forest plants compared to migrant ethnic minority groups (MEs) . Additionally, traditional ecological knowledge is crucial for the conservation and sustainable use of NTFPs, as seen in the indigenous botanical knowledge system in Indonesia . Lack of understanding existing local systems promoting sustainable forest management can lead to overexploitation of NTFP species and marginalization of forest-dependent communities . Moreover, inadequate knowledge affects the marketing chain of NTFPs, with issues such as price fixation by middlemen, lack of market information, and transportation challenges hindering collectors in India . Therefore, enhancing knowledge about NTFPs is essential for their sustainable management and conservation.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Lack of knowledge can lead to overexploitation of NTFPs. Indigenous knowledge aids sustainable management, as seen in Southern Sumatra, Indonesia, through traditional practices and agroforestry systems. | |
01 Jan 2023 | The lack of market information and awareness hinders NTFP management by collectors in Jharkhand, India, impacting pricing, transport, and weighing practices, as revealed in the study. |
| Lack of knowledge can hinder the optimal utilization and sustainable management of non-timber forest products (NTFPs), impacting biodiversity conservation and economic potential in local communities. | |
14 Dec 2022 | The lack of knowledge in NTFP management can lead to the marginalization of forest-dependent communities and overexploitation of NTFP species, undermining conservation and development initiatives. |
| The lack of knowledge impacts NTFP management as indigenous peoples have better understanding of edible forest plants compared to migrant ethnic groups, influencing sustainable resource use and conservation strategies. |
Related Questions
What are the potential economic impacts of implementing the EU's deforestation-free supply chain regulation on the forestry industry?5 answersThe implementation of the EU's deforestation-free supply chain regulation can have significant economic impacts on the forestry industry. This regulation aims to prohibit the trading of deforestation-linked commodities and products in the EU market, potentially affecting trade with Latin American countries, which are key trade partners. Furthermore, efforts to move towards zero deforestation in agricultural commodity supply chains, such as soy, maize, palm oil, cocoa, rubber, and beef, may lead to a rapid decrease in agricultural expansion in tropical frontiers and a transition towards more intensive production, impacting economic activities in these regions. Additionally, transitioning to sustainable forest management as part of a forest bioeconomy can lead to changes in the cost structure of economies, potentially increasing operational costs and affecting gross value added in the forestry sector.
How does limited access to finance affect the management of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in developing countries?5 answersLimited access to finance significantly hinders the effective management of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in developing countries. In many instances, rural households rely heavily on NTFPs for income generation, food security, and medicinal purposes. However, constraints such as inadequate finance and lack of capital impede the sustainable utilization of these resources. NTFPs play a crucial role in providing livelihood opportunities for forest-dependent communities, with NTFP collection contributing substantially to their total income. Initiatives aimed at commercializing NTFPs to improve forest community livelihoods often overlook the financial barriers faced by these communities, leading to overexploitation of NTFP species and marginalization of local populations. Therefore, addressing the financial challenges through improved access to finance is essential for promoting sustainable management practices and ensuring the long-term viability of NTFPs in developing countries.
What factors affect adoption of forest certification?5 answersFactors that affect the adoption of forest certification include the perception of certification's ability to support ecosystem services, the influence of procedural factors on certification outcomes, the gap between developed and developing countries in achieving certification, the understanding of forest certification and its role in ensuring ecosystem services, and the perceptions of forest owners and managers on how certification supports individual ecosystem services. These factors are influenced by various dimensions such as attitudes, reasons for adoption, governance capacity, market responses, risk aversion, and the attitude-behavior gap. The size of the managed forest area and the type of certification scheme implemented also play a role in the level of understanding and perception of certification. Additionally, the lack of information and knowledge about certification, skepticism about public support, and the cost of certification are barriers to adoption.
What are the economic, social and environmental benefits of non-timber forest products in KAZA?5 answersNon-timber forest products (NTFPs) in KAZA provide economic, social, and environmental benefits. NTFPs contribute to rural livelihoods and food security, serving as critical sources of food, medicine, shelter, building materials, fuels, and cash income. They offer income opportunities and poverty alleviation in both rural and urban areas, with low capital requirements and easy entry to markets. Cultivating NTFPs on managed lands can help meet production and sustainability goals, conserve wild populations, and generate income for landowners. In KAZA, NTFPs play an important role in the local economy, providing employment and subsistence for millions of people. Additionally, sustainable management of NTFP resources is crucial for the health and functioning of forest ecosystems and associated rural communities. By including NTFPs in forest management, the full range of benefits can be realized, ensuring economic, social, and environmental sustainability.
Why timber harvesting is seen to be bad by non-educated (forestry) people?4 answersTimber harvesting is seen as bad by non-educated people in forestry because of several reasons. Firstly, there is a concern that timber harvesting contributes to deforestation, which is a major environmental issue. Countries with a higher emphasis on timber harvesting tend to experience larger deforestation rates. Secondly, there is a perception that timber harvesting is not sustainable worldwide, as the demand for timber products increases rapidly. Additionally, there is a lack of understanding and undervaluing of the knowledge and practices of timber harvesters by research scientists, policy-makers, and managers. This exclusion of harvesters as knowledgeable actors in forest ecosystems leads to resistance to research and management, devaluing of local harvesting traditions, and missed opportunities for collaboration. Furthermore, there is a distrust of foresters among some groups, which may contribute to the negative perception of timber harvesting.
How can indigenous knowledge be better integrated into community-based fisheries management?5 answersIndigenous knowledge can be better integrated into community-based fisheries management by recognizing its value as a source of baseline information for research and management of fish genetic resources. This can be achieved by adopting indigenous people's knowledge as an additional or alternative strategy for the management of fish resources. Engaging with indigenous communities through participatory monitoring can increase their participation in fisheries management and ensure that their knowledge and perspectives are considered. It is important to address power dynamics and ensure that the process is empowering and transformative for indigenous communities. Additionally, promoting access to and governance of diverse fisheries, facilitating the exchange of seafood among communities, and supporting knowledge transfer among generations can enhance social-ecological resilience, food security, and community well-being. Successful integration of indigenous knowledge into community-based fisheries management requires engagement with all aspects of the governing regime and collaboration among various actors.