scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

How nucclear tecnology has altered national security? 


Best insight from top research papers

Nuclear technology has significantly altered national security by introducing new challenges and opportunities. The illicit transportation and trafficking of nuclear materials and radioactive sources have become a global concern, leading to the demand for efficient security and non-proliferation technologies . The technical operating requirements of nuclear weapons have played a crucial role in shaping nuclear doctrine, driving the American military towards a counterforce-biased strategy and away from a city-strike approach . The fight against international terrorism has necessitated the use of nuclear methods of inspection for non-intrusive analysis of materials, border monitoring, and detection of illicit trafficking . The proliferation of biotechnologies has also raised concerns, as the capabilities for harm have increased with the accessibility of powerful tools and information . The complex and rapidly changing technological environment has made a technological edge crucial for national security, fueling the Revolution in Military Affairs and intensifying the struggle between nation-states for control and supremacy .

Answers from top 4 papers

More filters
Papers (4)Insight
Open accessBook
01 Jun 2018
1 Citations
The provided paper does not mention anything about nuclear technology and its impact on national security.
The provided paper does not discuss how nuclear technology has altered national security. The paper primarily focuses on the potential threats and regulations surrounding the "nuclearization" of biology.
The provided paper discusses the use of passive gamma-ray and neutron detection and imaging technologies in national security and non-proliferation applications. However, it does not specifically address how nuclear technology has altered national security.
The paper does not directly address how nuclear technology has altered national security.

Related Questions

How has technology changed international security?5 answersTechnology has significantly altered international security dynamics. Breakthroughs in AI have intensified global commercial competition and reshaped the security environment, posing risks to American society and altering national security threats. Offense-defense theory highlights how technological advancements impact the likelihood of conflict or cooperation among states, emphasizing the importance of the balance between offensive and defensive capabilities. The scarcity of skilled security personnel, as noted, underscores a critical challenge in maintaining cybersecurity measures. Technopolitics explores the intricate relationship between technology, security governance, and sovereignty struggles, emphasizing the unintended consequences of technological interventions and the distributed agency between human and non-human actors. Emerging autonomous systems, including AI, are poised to reshape power dynamics globally, potentially leading to new AI hegemons and necessitating norm-setting and arms control mechanisms among key players.
How is technology challenging nuclear deterrence?5 answersTechnological advancements, particularly in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), are challenging nuclear deterrence in several ways. AI and autonomy have the potential to decrease nuclear stability and increase the likelihood of escalation to nuclear use, thereby undermining deterrence. These advancements have made nuclear forces more vulnerable by eroding the traditional methods of ensuring arsenal survivability, such as hardening and concealment. Additionally, AI can alter cost-benefit calculations, remove the fog of war, and diminish the human cost of military engagement, potentially recalibrating the balance between offensive and defensive measures. It may also quicken the overall pace of action in conflict, crisis, and war, compressing the distance between intelligence, political decisions, and coercive action. These technological changes pose critical challenges to the basis for confidence in contemporary deterrence stability and have implications for national and international security policy.
What are the main challenges posed by the use of new technologies in cyberspace for national security?4 answersThe main challenges posed by the use of new technologies in cyberspace for national security include the following: the transnational and elusive nature of cyberspace, which makes it difficult to control and regulate; the ability of cyber threat actors to use social media and false personas to influence large populations and spread propaganda; the emergence of cyber crime, such as hacking and data manipulation, which poses a threat to stability and requires balancing crime-fighting techniques with computer technology; the need for effective digital communication tools to provide transparency, public information access, and feedback for national security purposes; and the constant emergence and evolution of new cyber threats, which require flexible and operational cybersecurity strategies at the national level.
What is the impact of nuclear proliferation?4 answersNuclear proliferation has various impacts. It increases the likelihood of nuclear war, including small-scale nuclear wars or nuclear terrorism that could escalate to nuclear war between superpowers. The possession of nuclear weapons confers benefits on a state, but the path to proliferation is often violent. States that initiate a nuclear weapons program face an increased risk of being attacked, especially over territorial issues. However, once nuclear weapons are acquired, the risk of being attacked dramatically drops. The impact of nuclear proliferation on South Asian security is a subject of concern, with some scholars arguing that nuclear weapons make war in South Asia extremely unlikely, while others maintain that the spread of nuclear weapons will have negative effects. Nuclear proliferation has become a major field of interdisciplinary international relations research, with studies focusing on the causes and consequences of proliferation. The literature on the consequences of proliferation remains thinner than the literature on its causes. Crises involving nuclear actors are more likely to end without violence, and the likelihood of war decreases as the number of nuclear actors involved increases.
What are the impacts of Cyberterrorism to national security?5 answersCyberterrorism poses a serious threat to national security. The development of telecommunications networks has made international cyberterrorism more widespread, allowing terrorists to carry out various types of threats with anonymity and without fear of capture or elimination. The use and abuse of computers and networks have revolutionized information gathering, communications, and fund-raising for individuals, organizations, and nations, including terrorists. Potential adversaries have the capacity to conduct cyber-attacks, including surveillance, gathering technical information, and mapping networks and infrastructure, which can be exploited in future conflicts. Cybersecurity impacts not only national security but also economic and trade security, critical infrastructure security, and even public health and political security. Cyberterrorism exploits vulnerabilities in civilian and military systems, affecting both national and global security.
What were the causes of the expansion of nuclear weapons?5 answersThe expansion of nuclear weapons was driven by various factors. The literature highlights the role of insecurity and the search for military independence as key drivers of post-World War II nuclear proliferation. The study also emphasizes the importance of understanding the motives of states to acquire nuclear weapons, as well as the implications for regional and global security. The development of civilian nuclear power programs and the spread of technical capability are also identified as factors contributing to nuclear weapons acquisition. Additionally, the history of nuclear weapons programs in Britain, France, and China demonstrates how political turmoil and economic hardship did not deter their pursuit of atomic and thermonuclear weapons. Overall, the causes of nuclear weapons expansion involve a complex interplay of political, economic, and security considerations.

See what other people are reading

What are the core values that define Israeli strategic culture?
9 answers
What was responsible for the 1989 train explosion in Ufa?
5 answers
What are the opportunities and challenges for peace and development in North-East Asia today?
5 answers
American and european perspectives on yemen
5 answers
What is the history of Far-right violence in the US?
5 answers
Aims of non alligned movement?
5 answers
What are the key factors driving the development of defense systems in the Asia Pacific region?
5 answers
The development of defense systems in the Asia-Pacific region is primarily driven by various factors. These include the need for new capabilities for power projection, mobility, firepower, intelligence, and joint operations, as well as the acquisition of modern and advanced armaments by regional militaries. Additionally, factors such as financial development, trade, technological innovation, and FDI inflow positively influence defense expenditures, while economic growth and bureaucratic effectiveness display a negative impact. The evolution of security systems in the region, including the impact of mega-projects like the Indo-Pacific Region and the Belt and Road Initiative, also plays a crucial role in shaping defense developments. Furthermore, amidst rising competition and nuclear modernization plans in the region, the importance of nuclear weapons and associated technologies is gaining momentum, leading to a potential strategic arms race.
Who is the author of the deterrence theory?
4 answers
The deterrence theory, which forms the basis for contemporary criminological perspectives, was initially developed by Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham. Beccaria, an Italian economist and philosopher, presented the theory in his work "An Essay on Crimes and Punishments" in 1764, emphasizing that individuals make decisions based on maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain, and unless deterred, may engage in criminal behavior. Bentham, an English philosopher, further expanded on this theory in his work "An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation" in 1781, laying the groundwork for modern rational choice theory. Their contributions to deterrence theory have significantly influenced the understanding of criminal behavior and the development of strategies to prevent crime.
What are the implications of using the Panopticon metaphor in China's surveillance for individual privacy and civil liberties?
5 answers
The Panopticon metaphor, originally conceptualized by Jeremy Bentham and later popularized by Michel Foucault, has been extensively applied to understand the dynamics of surveillance and control in modern societies. Its relevance is particularly pronounced in the context of China's Social Credit System, which exemplifies a new form of interaction between the state and its citizens through information and communication technologies. This system, by design, increases government control over society, potentially diminishing trust and reducing individual freedom, despite its intention to improve self-regulation through depersonalized standards. The implications of employing the Panopticon metaphor in analyzing China's surveillance practices extend to individual privacy and civil liberties in several ways. Firstly, the metaphor underscores the transition towards a society where individuals are subjected to continuous surveillance, leading to a state of conscious and permanent visibility that inherently limits personal freedom. This visibility, intended to assure the automatic functioning of power, directly impacts privacy by denying individuals the authority to withdraw from scrutiny, thereby diminishing their sense of self-ownership. Moreover, the metaphor highlights the emergence of self-surveillance or the heautopticon, where individuals internalize the surveillance gaze, leading to self-regulation and potentially self-censorship. This internalization of surveillance can erode civil liberties by fostering an environment where individuals are compelled to conform to societal norms and expectations, often at the expense of personal freedoms and dissent. Additionally, the Panopticon metaphor, through its application to the digital realm, reveals how modern surveillance technologies extend beyond physical spaces to influence and control behavior in the virtual world, blurring the boundaries between public and private life. This pervasive surveillance capability, facilitated by technologies such as closed-circuit television, satellite, and the internet, further encroaches on individual privacy and civil liberties by enabling continuous monitoring and data collection. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the metaphor also illustrates how states can leverage emergency measures to normalize extensive surveillance practices, potentially leading to a permanent state of emergency where systematic and systemic infringements on human rights become regularized. This normalization of surveillance under the guise of public health and safety poses significant risks to civil liberties by justifying the expansion of state power and control under exceptional circumstances. In conclusion, the application of the Panopticon metaphor to China's surveillance practices reveals profound implications for individual privacy and civil liberties. It highlights the transformative impact of surveillance technologies on the relationship between the state and its citizens, emphasizing the erosion of privacy, the internalization of surveillance, and the potential for a permanent state of emergency that normalizes extensive control measures.
How does the implementation of a panopticon affect user privacy and security on social media platforms?
8 answers
The implementation of a panopticon in the context of social media platforms significantly affects user privacy and security, primarily through enhanced surveillance capabilities and the commodification of personal data. The metaphor of the panopticon, originally conceptualized by Jeremy Bentham and later analyzed by Michel Foucault, is increasingly relevant in the digital age, where invisible monitoring and data collection practices are commonplace. This surveillance mechanism, adapted to the digital era, is evident in the way marketing imperatives drive the employment of information technologies to surveil individuals online, commodifying privacy in the process. Social media platforms, embodying a form of electronic Panopticon, extend and intensify privacy threats by facilitating the collection, analysis, and commercial use of personal data. This is further complicated by the paradoxical effects of quantified-self technologies, which, while empowering users in some respects, also lead to self-surveillance, thereby blurring the lines between empowerment and disempowerment. The notion of voluntary servitude in social media suggests that users, to some extent, willingly submit to surveillance, trading privacy for perceived benefits, thus complicating the discourse around privacy and surveillance. Moreover, the use of facial recognition technologies and the integration of vast databases for surveillance purposes represent a significant leap towards realizing the panoptic vision in urban spaces, affecting societal conceptions of privacy and altering individual and group dynamics. The educational sector's use of social technologies for visibility and assessment further illustrates the panopticon's reach, highlighting conflicts between the benefits of a cohesive learning community and concerns over privacy and identity performance. The chilling effects of mass surveillance, as discussed in the context of the Panopticon metaphor, underscore the impact on user behavior, potentially deterring free expression and participation due to fears of being watched. This is exacerbated by the growing capabilities for anonymous communication online, which, while offering a form of resistance, also underscore the pervasive nature of surveillance. Finally, the emergence of big data analytics from digital devices and services further extends the panoptic surveillance capabilities, enabling unprecedented levels of monitoring and profiling that pose significant challenges to privacy and security. In summary, the implementation of a panopticon on social media platforms profoundly impacts user privacy and security, facilitating extensive surveillance and data commodification, while also engendering complex dynamics of empowerment, disempowerment, and voluntary servitude.
What is deterrence theory?
5 answers
Deterrence theory, rooted in classical criminological principles by Beccaria and Bentham, posits that individuals are rational actors who weigh the benefits and costs of their actions to maximize pleasure and minimize pain. It suggests that crime can be deterred by increasing the certainty, swiftness, and severity of legal punishments. The theory distinguishes between specific and general deterrence, emphasizing the importance of perceived punishments in influencing behavior. Emotions play a significant role in deterrence, affecting the efficacy of the theory and practical implementation efforts. Moreover, deterrence theory has been proposed as a framework to enhance accountability in the criminal justice system, emphasizing the importance of certainty and swiftness in imposing sanctions for ethical and legal breaches.