How regimes differ from agreements?
Best insight from top research papers
Regimes differ from agreements in terms of their scope and structure. Regimes encompass a broader set of rules and norms that govern interactions between multiple countries, often involving various agreements within them. Agreements, on the other hand, are specific legal instruments that focus on particular issues between two or more parties. Regimes can be multilateral or bilateral, incorporating different types of agreements, while agreements are more focused and can be part of a larger regime. Regimes can involve interactions between multiple international institutions, influencing each other's development and performance. In contrast, agreements are more specific and may not have the same level of interconnectedness with other international frameworks as regimes do.
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Regimes refer to the overall system, while agreements are specific legal documents within the regime, as discussed in the paper on trade agreements and environmental norms. | |
| Regimes are broader frameworks governing multiple agreements, while agreements are specific pacts addressing particular issues within those regimes, as outlined in the paper on regime interaction. | |
| Regimes encompass multilateral or bilateral instruments, while agreements are typically bilateral. Regimes involve multiple countries and address broader issues, whereas agreements are between two parties. | |
12 Citations | Currency regimes refer to exchange rate systems, while trade agreements involve terms of trade. Regimes impact competitiveness, while agreements influence price competitiveness and financial openness, as outlined in the paper. |
Related Questions
How to define a regime in regime theory?4 answersA regime in regime theory can be defined as the informal arrangements between public bodies and private interests that work together to make and implement governing decisions. In the field of International Relations, regime theory has been analyzed to recast it as a part of IR theory, focusing on different waves of theorization such as neo-neo-convergence regime theory, cognitivism, and radical constructivism/post-structuralism. Additionally, the concept of a regime extends to various domains, including the criminal justice system, where the regime in correctional institutions is defined by the conditions for serving a sentence and the means of ensuring protection and supervision over convicts. Furthermore, in dynamical systems, a regime is associated with non-trivial topological structures, simplifying complex dynamics and behavior.
How international regimes differ from international organizations?5 answersInternational regimes differ from international organizations in their focus and function. International regimes, as per, are cooperative structures based on common principles, norms, rules, and procedures, aimed at specific thematic areas. They help coordinate actors' behavior and reduce uncertainty in the international system. On the other hand, international organizations, as discussed inand, are formal entities that provide a legal framework for continuous negotiations and are crucial for the creation and evolution of international regimes. While international organizations facilitate negotiations and provide a base for regime development, regimes themselves focus on establishing rules and procedures specific to certain issue areas, aiding in international stability and cooperation.
What are the main factors that determine the effectiveness of a regime?4 answersThe main factors that determine the effectiveness of a regime include the impact of international norms, the effect of IO mechanisms, the nature of interorganizational overlap, state preferences for policy implementation, the distribution of power, the roles of pushers and laggards, decision rules, the depth and density of regime rules, the extent of knowledge of the relevant problem, legalisation, flexibility, and social capital embedded in inter-state networks. These factors contribute to the ability of a regime to govern actor behavior, resolve political problems, and address environmental issues effectively. The combination of quantitative methods and qualitative analysis can provide insights into the determinants of regime effectiveness and help identify patterns and causal mechanisms. Further research using quantitative analyses can enhance our understanding of regime effectiveness and strengthen our ability to design effective institutional arrangements.
What is the meaning of international regime?5 answersThe concept of international regime refers to the specific actualization of international organizations formed in a centralistic, independent, and rational manner. It is a set of principles, norms, rules, and decision-making procedures around which actors' expectations converge in a given area of international relations. International regimes play a crucial role in creating and facilitating international cooperation between countries. They structure the expectations of various actors and contribute to ensuring international stability. However, the lack of formal consolidation and institutionalization of these norms within international treaties reduces their legitimacy. International regimes develop in areas where cooperation is not only possible but also desired by states. They are an important mechanism for preventing or solving conflicts through cooperation, especially through international institutions.
What is regime international in general?1 answersRegime international refers to the concept of international regimes, which are social institutions that influence the behavior of states and their subjects in the international system. These regimes are characterized by a set of mutual expectations, rules, regulations, and decision-making procedures that govern the interactions among international actors. They play a key role in global governance, guiding and setting the responsibilities of various actors involved in international procedures. International regimes are seen as executive arms of governments in the era of global governance, promoting cooperation, reliance, security, and international stability. They have been developed as an analytical tool to understand the cooperation in a multipolar international system and have been successful in explaining historical developments in international relations. However, changes in the international political economy and the rise of non-state actors have also challenged the relevance of the concept of international regimes.
What are the characteristics of each type of international regime?1 answersInternational regimes can be categorized into different types based on their characteristics. One type is the regime that focuses on the principles, norms, rules, and procedures specific to a particular international area. These regimes are sustained by a permanent organizational framework and continuous negotiations, which help their members achieve their goals and resolve common interests without escalating tensions or leading to war. Another type of regime is grounded in states' mutual cooperation rather than the dictates of the most powerful states. These regimes are often shaped by states' interests in the free flow of commerce and their policy autonomy. They have been influenced by factors such as deregulation and the decline of traditional cartel elements, which have led some states to prioritize economic openness over control of their own economies. The literature on international regimes also emphasizes their role as social institutions that influence the behavior of states and their subjects, consisting of both informal and formalized principles. Additionally, recent research highlights the importance of regime type in international relations, suggesting that democratic and autocratic leaders can achieve similar levels of domestic constraint and international outcomes. However, regime type still differentiates between democracies and autocracies, as leaders in each regime have varying degrees of agency within their institutions and face different challenges in engaging or escaping domestic audience constraint.