How SCT explain intergroup conflict?
Best insight from top research papers
The Social Identity Approach (SIA) provides an understanding of how identity-based motivations interact with social structures to predict intergroup conflict . It recognizes that individuals value and internalize identities relevant to their social, geographic, economic, historical, and political positions, and any devaluation or loss of those identities can be threatening . SIA also explains how procedural justice mechanisms can guide conflicting interests towards common cooperative goals . Additionally, acculturation, the adoption of the victor's cultural traits, can drive intergroup conflict even without providing benefits to individuals or their groups . This process favors the transmission of conflict and can be costly to both the host group and individuals within it . Overall, these theories and approaches shed light on the psychological processes and motivations that contribute to intergroup conflict.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The provided paper does not mention SCT (Social Cognitive Theory) or explain how it relates to intergroup conflict. | |
| The provided paper does not mention the term "SCT" or provide an explanation of intergroup conflict based on SCT. | |
14 Citations | The paper explains that the Social Identity Approach (SIA) provides an understanding of how identity-based motivations interact with social structures to predict intergroup conflict. It also explains how procedural justice mechanisms can guide conflicting interests towards common cooperative goals. |
1 Citations | The paper does not specifically mention Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) in relation to explaining intergroup conflict. |
| The paper does not specifically mention how Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) explains intergroup conflict. The paper focuses on the broader study of intergroup relations and does not provide details on specific theories or explanations for intergroup conflict. |
Related Questions
How does social identity theory explain the dynamics of group conflict and cooperation?4 answersSocial Identity Theory (SIT) offers a comprehensive framework for understanding the dynamics of group conflict and cooperation, emphasizing the role of self-conception and cognitive processes in shaping group behaviors and intergroup relations. At its core, SIT posits that individuals define themselves in terms of group memberships, which are sources of pride and self-esteem. This identification process influences behaviors, leading to in-group favoritism and potential out-group hostility.
The theory elucidates how collective violence, as an extreme form of group conflict, is systematically orchestrated by influential in-group leaders against defined enemies, underlining the role of social identity in mobilizing groups for coordinated violent acts. Similarly, group identity can escalate conflicts by reducing free-riding behavior within groups, while simultaneously increasing rent dissipation and welfare losses in contests between groups, highlighting the double-edged sword of strong group identification.
In the context of collective action, SIT has been instrumental in explaining participation in movements, such as the Yellow Vests in France, where identification with the group mediated the effect of social media use on collective action. This theory also sheds light on conflicts within professional settings, such as healthcare, where group processes and identification can lead to conflicts that impede collaborative practice.
Moreover, SIT suggests that social identity can facilitate the formation of a critical mass necessary for collective action, such as forming cooperatives, by leveraging social incentives to overcome cooperation barriers. However, the theory also acknowledges the challenges in health communication, where tailoring messages to group identities can sometimes reinforce unhealthy behaviors.
Research in computer-supported cooperative work has applied SIT to understand intra- and inter-group dynamics online, offering new perspectives on collaboration, conflict, and leadership in digital spaces. Additionally, the theory's application extends to educational contexts, where history textbooks can influence social identity and conflict dynamics by shaping narratives around identity markers.
Finally, SIT's relevance to international business (IB) scholars highlights its potential to explain collective action, emotion, and social change, especially in addressing identity politics and uncertainty. This broad applicability of SIT underscores its utility in dissecting the complex interplay between group identification, conflict, and cooperation across various domains.
How has social psychology tried to address intergroup relations?5 answersSocial psychology has addressed intergroup relations through various approaches. Initially, the field focused on understanding intergroup bias, leading to the formulation of the contact hypothesis by Gordon Allport in 1954, which highlights the positive effects of intergroup contact in reducing prejudice and promoting harmonious relations. Recent research has shown that interventions aimed at improving intergroup relations have been successful in reducing prejudicial attitudes and fostering peace-building behaviors. Studies have also emphasized the effectiveness of intergroup contact as an intervention strategy to reduce bias, increase trust, and enhance intergroup relationships. Qualitative analysis in specific settings, such as group homes, has further explored the discursive construction of ingroup and outgroup dynamics, shedding light on intergroup bias and group qualification.
How does conflict theory explain prejudice?5 answersConflict theory explains prejudice by highlighting the role of ideological conflict and worldview protection. According to this theory, individuals are motivated to protect their worldviews, and one way they do this is through prejudice towards groups or individuals with different ideologies ^[Brandt & Crawford]. This protection of worldviews can be seen across different political and religious domains, as well as in measures of individual differences historically associated with prejudice, such as disgust sensitivity, personality traits, and cognitive ability ^[Brandt & Crawford]. The theory suggests that both traditional and liberal individuals may engage in prejudice to protect their worldviews, and that this link between worldview conflict and prejudice is consistent across different worldviews, expressions of prejudice, and countries ^[Brandt & Crawford]. The underlying factors driving this link include value dissimilarity, identity, and uncertainty management ^[Brandt & Crawford]. Understanding and addressing these factors can potentially reduce worldview conflict and its manifestation in prejudice ^[Brandt & Crawford].
What is intergeneraional conflict?4 answersIntergenerational conflict refers to conflicts that arise between individuals of different generational categories due to perceived differences in values, behaviors, or identities. These conflicts can be resolved by focusing on achievements, image, or one's ego. Conflicts between younger and older generations can also have a broader social impact and play a role in defining new social realities. Intergenerational solidarity and conflict are interconnected, and it is important to consider both when discussing this topic. While there are speculations about increasing intergenerational conflict in Europe due to demographic changes, evidence suggests that the decreasing legitimacy of welfare for the elderly does not necessarily indicate a rise in intergenerational conflict.
Can you give me literature on intergroup contact?5 answersRecent literature on intergroup contact highlights its effectiveness in reducing prejudice and promoting harmonious intergroup relations. Studies have shown that positive intergroup contact, characterized by equal status, common goals, and institutional support, can significantly reduce prejudice and increase support for intergroup equality. Additionally, research has explored the potential of nostalgic recall of intergroup contact as a strategy for improving intergroup attitudes and behavior. Visual analysis of research articles has indicated an increasing focus on intergroup contact, with a particular emphasis on topics such as intergroup attitude, anxiety, and intervention strategies. Furthermore, the broader context within which intergroup contact occurs has been found to be important, with factors such as perceived parental support, media representation, and broader intergroup dynamics influencing the relationship between contact and social distance from outgroups. Overall, the literature emphasizes the significance of intergroup contact in reducing prejudice and improving intergroup relations, while also acknowledging the importance of considering the broader contextual factors at play.
What are people to the theory of conflict?3 answersPeople are central to the theory of conflict, as it seeks to understand the conditions and factors that generate conflict in diverse social environments. Conflict theory aims to educate students about how, under what conditions, and why conflict arises, and how it can be managed. Theories within the category of conflict theory attempt to explain crime and deviance through various aspects of human interaction that may lead to conflict or dispute. The study of social conflict also involves the examination of community disputes, their resolution, and the relationship between the state and society. Overall, conflict theory recognizes conflict as a natural part of human social interaction and seeks to analyze and understand its causes and consequences in different contexts.