How to categorized weight status by using bmi in children?
Best insight from top research papers
Categorizing weight status in children using Body Mass Index (BMI) involves several considerations and methodologies, as highlighted by recent research. BMI is a quick screening tool that has shown high sensitivity and specificity for identifying children with normal and underweight statuses but varies in effectiveness for overweight and obese children. However, the accuracy of BMI to categorize body weight in children with disabilities, such as those with spina bifida and Down syndrome, is significantly challenged, suggesting the need for alternative strategies. The relationship between BMI and various health indicators, such as spirometry results and respiratory muscle strength, further complicates its use in categorizing weight status. For instance, children who are overweight or obese have been shown to have reduced FEV1/FVC ratios compared to their peers, indicating potential alterations in respiratory flow dynamics. Additionally, the correlation between BMI percentiles and actual body composition varies, with some children classified as healthy or overweight by BMI% having higher body fat percentages than recommended standards. Alternative metrics like the percentage of BMI in excess of the 95th percentile (BMI95pct) have been proposed to better capture variability in weight at extreme ends of growth curves and improve understanding of relationships between weight status and clinical outcomes. Moreover, the use of BMI-for-age growth charts is recommended for assessing weight status in children, despite the challenges in accurately representing extreme BMI values . Adjusting weight categorization for maturation status has also been suggested to account for early-maturing adolescents, who may be misclassified by standard BMI centile comparisons. Despite BMI being a convenient initial screen for childhood obesity, its limitations and the need for more reliable measures are acknowledged, especially in light of the American Medical Association classifying obesity as a disease. In summary, while BMI remains a widely used tool for categorizing weight status in children, its limitations necessitate a multifaceted approach that considers alternative metrics, the specific needs of children with disabilities, and the potential for misclassification due to factors like maturation status.
Answers from top 10 papers
More filters
| Papers (10) | Insight |
|---|---|
3 Citations | BMI can be used to categorize weight status in children, but it has limitations in accurately assessing body fatness, especially in moderate-risk individuals, potentially leading to inadequate healthcare practices. |
| Weight status in children is categorized using BMI-for-age growth charts, with thresholds from the CDC. Alternative BMI metrics like BMIz (extended) and percent from the median are suggested for monitoring weight status. | |
| Weight status in children can be categorized using BMI centiles compared to age-matched or maturity-adjusted referents, with adjustments for maturation potentially leading to significant reclassifications. | |
| Weight status in children is categorized using BMI-for-age growth charts. BMI (weight in kg divided by height in meters squared) is compared to age-specific percentiles to determine underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obesity. | |
| Weight status in children is categorized using BMI percentiles based on age and sex, as healthy weight, overweight, and various classes of obesity according to standardized nomogram tools. | |
| Weight status in children can be categorized using BMI by considering BMI95pct, which evaluates BMI in relation to the 95th percentile for age, height, weight, and gender. | |
| BMI is not accurate for categorizing weight status in children with disabilities like spina bifida and Down syndrome. Alternative strategies are needed due to significant misclassifications compared to typically developing peers. | |
| Weight status in children can be categorized using BMI centile scores into underweight, healthy, overweight, or obese groups based on epidemiological cut-offs, as shown in the study. | |
01 Jan 2017 | Classification of weight status in children using BMI can be achieved by grouping classes into thinness, normal, and obesity categories based on clinical and anthropometric indicators, as shown in the study. |
| BMI is a useful tool for categorizing weight status in children. It shows high sensitivity and specificity for normal and underweight categories, but lower sensitivity for overweight and obese children. |
Related Questions
. what's the cut-off value for underweight in children by weight for length and BMI?8 answersThe cut-off value for underweight in children varies depending on the metric used, such as weight for length or BMI, and is influenced by age, sex, and population-specific growth standards. For BMI, underweight in children is often defined by cut-offs that consider age and sex-specific percentiles or standard deviations from median BMI values. Andersen et al. question the applicability of the 5th BMI percentile as a substantiated cut-off for anorexia nervosa in youths, suggesting that rigid adherence to this cut-off may hinder early detection and treatment of eating disorders. Similarly, van Buuren's analysis based on Dutch growth standards indicates that underweight and serious underweight in children up to 18 years of age can be determined by calculating the percentage of 18-year-olds falling below specific BMI thresholds, reflecting changes in population weight distribution over time.
Cole and Lobstein discuss the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) BMI cut-offs, which are linked to child centiles averaged across countries, but these cut-offs cannot be directly expressed as centiles like the WHO standard, complicating direct comparisons. Hermanussen et al. argue that the prevalence of thinness, overweight, and obesity depends on population height, suggesting that BMI-for-age z-scores (BAZ) may not be universally applicable without considering population-specific height distributions.
Pasco et al. highlight the limitations of BMI as a surrogate marker for adiposity, suggesting that BMI thresholds for underweight, overweight, and obesity may not accurately reflect body fat percentage, especially in diverse populations. Thorup et al. propose using mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) as a simpler, yet effective anthropometric measure for identifying underweight in adults, which could be adapted for use in children in low-resource settings.
Carrascosa et al. provide BMI-for-age and tri-ponderal mass index-for-age (TMI) values for healthy non-underweight, non-obese children, suggesting that these metrics can be used to measure underweight status and obesity in pediatric populations. Weir and Jan describe the use of BMI to estimate body fat and define underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese categories, but note that BMI classifications may underestimate obesity risk in certain populations. Zsákai et al. discuss the development of national BMI cut-off points for Hungarian children, indicating that international and national cut-offs may yield different prevalence rates for underweight, overweight, and obesity, underscoring the importance of context-specific standards.
In summary, while the 5th percentile for BMI is commonly used to define underweight in children, this cut-off value's applicability may vary across different populations and age groups. Alternative measures and population-specific standards should be considered to accurately identify underweight status in children.
What is the effect of obesity on the pediatric population?4 answersChildhood obesity has significant effects on the pediatric population. It increases the risk of various complications such as type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and polycystic ovary syndrome. Obesity also leads to a higher incidence of microvascular complications, cancer, and autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, Crohn's disease, arthritis, and type 1 diabetes. Furthermore, obesity in childhood increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and premature mortality. The long-term consequences of obesity include persistent obesity, cardiovascular risk factors, and increased mortality in adulthood. Weight loss can modify these risks, with early weight loss being more beneficial. Lifestyle modification is the primary approach to managing pediatric obesity, but anti-obesity medications and bariatric surgery may also be considered in certain cases.
Does sedentary behaviour increase BMI in children?5 answersSedentary behavior has been found to be associated with increased BMI in children. Several studies have shown that spending too much time engaged in sedentary activities, especially screen-based sedentary behavior, is linked to obesity in children and adolescents. Sedentary behavior, such as prolonged sitting or screen time, has been shown to contribute to higher body mass index and waist circumference in children as young as 5-7 years old. Furthermore, a causal pathway has been identified, with childhood obesity leading to greater sedentary behavior. Longitudinal studies have also demonstrated that higher levels of sedentary behavior are associated with higher BMI and fat mass index over a five-year period. These findings highlight the importance of reducing sedentary behavior in order to promote healthy weight development in children.
When assessing the degree of obesity, waist circumference rather than BMI?4 answersWaist circumference is a more accurate measure of obesity compared to BMI. Studies have shown that waist circumference has a higher correlation with BMI and is a better indicator of fat distribution. It has been found to be a useful tool in assessing the development of metabolic syndrome in conditions like polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Additionally, waist circumference has been associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), indicating its relevance in assessing renal function. Evaluating waist circumference together with BMI provides clearer results in terms of the impact of obesity on quality of life. Furthermore, waist circumference-to-height ratio (WHt) has been proposed as an alternative measure to BMI, with studies showing that it provides a more accurate prevalence of overweight and obesity in children. Overall, waist circumference is a valuable tool in assessing the degree of obesity and its associated health risks.
What is the average weight of a child in kilograms?5 answersThe average weight of a child in kilograms is 10.98kg for male children.
• How is overweight and obesity diagnosed in children?2 answersOverweight and obesity in children are diagnosed using various anthropometric measures. Body mass index (BMI) is commonly used, but evidence on its accuracy is inconclusive. Other measures such as waist and neck circumferences and waist-to-height ratio have been shown to have advantages over BMI for identifying overweight and obesity risk in children. Practitioners may need to use a combination of measures to obtain desirable outcomes. Additionally, the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be determined using BMI-for-age and gender percentile charts. In a study of children with IBD, overweight was defined as ≥85th BMI percentile and obesity as ≥95th BMI percentile. The study found that the prevalence of overweight and obesity was higher in patients with ulcerative colitis compared to patients with Crohn's disease. Furthermore, a study on boys with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) found that being hyperactive does not prevent the development or persistence of overweight and obesity in children.