Is a systematic review a descriptive study?
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
| As a result, the validity of the systematic review findings and recommendations is partly a function of the quality of the systematic search of the literature. | |
55 Citations | Yet they offer a temporary workaround for preserving and maximizing the value of information from basic qualitative descriptive studies for systematic reviews. |
| the extent of searching undertaken for the reviews, description of study selection and inclusion criteria, comparability of included studies, assessment of publication bias and assessment of heterogeneity), (iv) presentation of results, and (v) implications for practice and research. Conducting a systematic review of reviews highlights the usefulness of bringing together a summary of reviews in one place, where there is more than one review on an important topic. | |
05 Feb 2017 16 Citations | Empirical approaches that include various systematic review (SR) methodologies such as systematic literature review (SLR) and systematic mapping study (SMS) are found to be effective in this context. |
Related Questions
What is a systematic review?5 answersA systematic review is a meticulous synthesis of all available primary research on a specific topic, considered the highest level of evidence in guiding clinical practice. It involves a rigorous methodology, including a predefined search strategy to identify and evaluate all relevant literature, distinguishing it from narrative reviews. Systematic reviews aim to minimize bias by critically appraising the quality of included studies and presenting findings systematically. Despite its popularity in medicine for supporting clinical decision-making, systematic reviews are not entirely immune to biases like inclusion of poor-quality studies or reporting biases, necessitating careful attention. In evidence-based practice, systematic reviews play a crucial role in synthesizing research results to address specific problems, offering valuable insights for various fields, including nursing.
What is systematic review?5 answersA systematic review is a rigorous and reproducible process that summarizes the current state of research on a specific topic. It is considered the most reliable source of evidence for guiding clinical practice. Systematic reviews aim to consolidate existing knowledge, identify unresolved problems, and facilitate evidence-based decision-making. They utilize a predefined search strategy to identify and appraise all available published literature on a specific topic, distinguishing them from narrative reviews. Systematic reviews provide the highest level of evidence on the hierarchy of evidence pyramid. They involve a series of steps, including formulating a research question, conducting an exhaustive literature search, selecting relevant studies, critically appraising the data, synthesizing results, and estimating the certainty of the evidence. The methodology and quality of included studies determine the reliability of the evidence presented in systematic reviews.
What is a systematic review in research?5 answersA systematic review is a rigorous method used in research to analyze, synthesize, and summarize existing literature on a specific topic. It involves systematically searching for relevant studies, appraising their quality, and reporting the findings. Systematic reviews are important in evidence-based research as they provide a comprehensive and transparent approach to evaluating the current knowledge on a particular subject. They help identify patterns, knowledge gaps, and prioritize future research. By following a structured methodology, systematic reviews minimize biases and provide more accurate results. They can be quantitative, qualitative, or a combination of both, known as mixed methods systematic reviews. Systematic reviews are widely used in various fields, including healthcare, education, psychology, and medicine, to inform decision-making, clinical practice, and policy development.
What is systematic literature review?5 answersA systematic literature review is a method used to provide a clear and objective summary of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic. It involves analyzing, synthesizing, and summarizing bodies of related literature to identify gaps, test hypotheses, develop new theories, and gain insights. The process requires careful planning, attention to detail, and a systematic approach to data collection and analysis. Systematic literature reviews are widely used in various fields, including healthcare, education, psychology, social sciences, and management research. They inform evidence-based decision-making, policy development, and practice guidelines. The reviews adhere to principles of accessibility and bias reduction, and they contribute to the advancement of knowledge by building on prior existing work.
Can know do a systematic review?5 answersA systematic review is a structured framework for summarizing evidence in a comprehensive and transparent manner. It can be conducted in various fields, including medicine, public policy, environmental health, and toxicology. The process involves conducting a comprehensive search for relevant published and unpublished work on a specific topic, integrating the search results, and critically evaluating the quality and nature of the evidence. Systematic reviews are considered the highest level of evidence and can inform evidence-based guidelines and decision-making. They can help reduce reliance on animal test data in risk assessment and validate alternative test methods. Conducting a systematic review requires careful planning, adherence to rigorous methodology, and the use of predefined search strategies. Software tools are available to facilitate and increase the efficiency of the review process. Systematic reviews are valuable for clarifying research findings, identifying inconsistencies, and addressing replication issues. Umbrella reviews, which provide overviews of several reviews on a topic, are particularly useful for addressing broad clinical questions.
Is a systematic review a retrospective study?3 answers