scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Is machine learning methods really better than traditional methods in state of charge estimation? 


Best insight from top research papers

Machine learning methods have shown significant promise in enhancing the accuracy and reliability of State of Charge (SOC) estimation for batteries, surpassing traditional methods in various aspects. Traditional SOC estimation techniques often struggle with the dynamic and complex nature of battery behavior under different conditions, leading to inaccuracies and reduced performance. In contrast, machine learning approaches, by leveraging data-driven insights, adapt more effectively to these challenges. The integration of machine learning with model-based approaches, such as the Kalman Filter framework, has been demonstrated to significantly improve SOC estimation accuracy. For instance, combining machine learning algorithms with the Kalman filter framework has resulted in higher estimation accuracy compared to using the Kalman filter alone. Specifically, algorithms like the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) and long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks have been effectively combined to achieve robust and fast SOC estimation under various working conditions. This hybrid approach addresses the limitations of each method when used independently, showcasing the superiority of machine learning-enhanced methodologies. Moreover, machine learning models like Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and LSTM have individually demonstrated high accuracy and robustness in SOC estimation across different temperatures and operational conditions. These models outperform traditional methods by effectively handling the nonlinearities and uncertainties associated with battery behavior. Furthermore, advancements in artificial intelligence have facilitated the development of novel machine learning techniques for SOC and State of Health (SOH) estimation, offering improved performance, passenger comfort, and safety for electric vehicles (EVs). The comprehensive comparisons and research progress reported in the literature highlight the advantages of machine learning-enabled methods over traditional approaches, including enhanced estimation accuracy and the ability to tackle the complexities of battery management systems. In conclusion, machine learning methods have indeed proven to be superior to traditional methods in SOC estimation, offering significant improvements in accuracy, adaptability, and practical applicability across various conditions and battery types.

Answers from top 10 papers

More filters
Papers (10)Insight
Machine learning methods, specifically Cascaded Feedforward Neural Network (CFNN), outperform traditional methods in state of charge estimation for electrified vehicle batteries, as shown in the research.
Machine learning methods, specifically Cascaded Feedforward Neural Network (CFNN), outperform traditional methods in state of charge estimation for electrified vehicle batteries, as shown in the research.
Machine learning methods show promise in state-of-charge estimation due to their accuracy and data-driven nature, surpassing traditional methods according to the research findings.
Machine learning methods, such as GRU, LSTM, and RNN, outperform traditional methods in State of Charge estimation for Li-ion batteries, reducing inaccuracies and complexity in hardware.
Machine learning methods show promise in state-of-charge estimation, offering improved accuracy and performance compared to traditional methods, as highlighted in the research paper.
Machine learning methods, such as GRU, LSTM, and RNN, outperform traditional methods in State of Charge estimation for Li-ion batteries, reducing inaccuracies and complexity in hardware.
Yes, integrating machine learning with Kalman filter framework improves state of charge estimation accuracy significantly compared to using traditional methods alone, as shown in the study.
Machine learning algorithms, particularly Gaussian Process Regression, outperform traditional methods for State of Charge estimation in lithium-ion batteries, as shown by higher accuracy and robustness in various conditions.
Yes, machine learning methods like LSTM neural networks combined with UKF are shown to be better than traditional methods for state of charge estimation in lithium-ion batteries.
Machine learning algorithms, particularly Gaussian Process Regression, outperform traditional methods for State of Charge estimation in lithium-ion batteries, as shown in the study.

Related Questions

Why lithium ion battery state of charge estimation is important?5 answersEstimating the state of charge (SOC) of lithium-ion batteries is crucial due to its impact on battery performance and longevity. Accurate SOC estimation is essential for calibrating the remaining charge in electric vehicles, ensuring efficient energy management, and preventing overcharging or deep discharging, which can damage the battery. Various methods like adaptive boosting algorithms, extended Kalman filters, and unscented Kalman filters are proposed to enhance SOC estimation accuracy. Reliable SOC estimation also aids in monitoring cell inconsistency, improving battery pack service life, and enhancing safety performance. Real-time SOC estimation is vital for battery management systems in electric locomotives and grid applications to ensure safe operation and maximize battery life.
What are the advantages of using traditional ML methods for predicting the remaining useful life?5 answersTraditional ML methods have certain advantages for predicting the remaining useful life (RUL). They are limited in some cases as equipment grows increasingly complicated and intelligent. However, they do not require prior knowledge and have strong nonlinear fitting ability. Traditional ML methods are suitable for RUL prediction in battery management systems (BMS) for industrial and academic research. They also require a substantial amount of prior knowledge to extract degraded features. These methods can accurately describe RUL based on the original historical data and have high application value.
How does model learning compare to traditional methods for black-box state machine models of hardware and software components?4 answersModel learning, also known as active automata learning, is a highly effective technique for obtaining black-box finite state models of software components. It has been challenging to generalize this approach to infinite state systems with data parameters. Existing model learning tools for infinite state systems face scalability problems and can only be applied to restricted classes of systems. However, a new approach has been proposed that boosts the performance of model learning techniques by extracting constraints on input and output parameters from a run, making this grey-box information available to the learner. This approach has shown significant improvement in terms of the number of inputs sent to the software system and enables the learning of models that are out of reach for black-box techniques.
How does AI teach calculating formal charge?5 answersAI teaches calculating formal charge by using the concept of formal charges to predict bond properties, determine molecular structure, and explain reactivities and the tendency to polymerize. In the field of legal AI, AI methods are used to predict legal judgments, including charge prediction. Charge prediction aims to predict charges from complicated legal facts, helping the court make judgments or providing legal professional guidance. To improve interpretability in charge prediction models, legal theory frameworks can be added to the modeling process. For example, the Double-layer Criminal System is used as a guide to build a Charge Prediction modeling called DCSCP, which achieves multi-granularity inference of legal charges by obtaining subjective and objective elements from fact descriptions of legal cases.
What are the limitations of deep learning models in accurately predicting charging demand?5 answersDeep learning models have limitations in accurately predicting charging demand. One limitation is that these models often fail to account for demand lost from occupied charging stations and competitors, resulting in an underestimation of the true demand for charging. This is because the observed charging records used as input for these models are biased towards the supply of available chargers and do not capture the latent (unobserved) demand. Another limitation is the reliance on historical data, which can be inadequate in countries or locations with recently installed EV stations. Additionally, the future uncertainties of input variables can affect the performance of deep learning models, especially when using an offline or fixed-sized data-based learning approach. Therefore, these limitations highlight the need for improved models that incorporate censorship and consider the impact of input variables to accurately forecast charging demand.
What are the different methods to estimate the state of charge of a battery?5 answersEstimating the state of charge (SOC) of a battery can be done using different methods. One approach is measurement-based estimation, which relies on current and voltage measurements. However, this method can be affected by noise and dc-bias, and it is time-consuming. Another approach is model-based estimation, which involves using battery models to estimate SOC. Four commonly used model-based techniques are the Kalman Filter, Extended Kalman Filter, Sigma Point Kalman Filter, and the H∞. These methods aim to improve accuracy and reduce computation time. Additionally, machine learning methods such as the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) can also be used for SOC estimation. These data-driven models have shown promising results in terms of accuracy and can handle different temperature conditions.

See what other people are reading

What is Dependency Parsing in context to feature engineering?
4 answers
Dependency parsing is a crucial aspect of natural language processing that involves extracting sentence structures and word relations based on dependency grammar. Feature engineering plays a vital role in enhancing the performance of dependency parsers. Various approaches have been proposed to expand the feature space, such as incorporating semantic and syntactic features derived from word clustering algorithms and phrase-structure parsers. Additionally, utilizing global sentence representations and local word collaborations through convolutional neural networks has shown significant improvements in graph-based dependency parsers. Furthermore, advancements in deep learning have enabled the development of transition-based parsers with improved representation capabilities, including the use of recurrent neural networks and separate classifiers for parsing and labeling tasks. These feature engineering techniques contribute to the accuracy and efficiency of dependency parsing algorithms.
What are the benefits of singkamas?
5 answers
Singkamas, also known as jicama, is a root vegetable that offers various health benefits. Singkamas is rich in fiber, which aids in digestion and promotes gut health. Additionally, singkamas is a good source of vitamin C, providing antioxidant properties that boost the immune system and promote skin health. Moreover, singkamas is low in calories and contains nutrients like potassium and magnesium, contributing to overall health and well-being. Including singkamas in the diet can help in weight management, improve digestion, enhance immunity, and support overall health due to its nutritional content and health-promoting properties.
How are kalman filters used for imus?
5 answers
Kalman filters are extensively utilized for IMUs to enhance accuracy and reduce noise in various applications. They are employed to suppress adversarial disturbances like external accelerations and magnetic interference, reduce computational costs while maintaining precision, improve real-time joint torque estimation without time lag, adapt noise components for optimal state estimation, and enhance trajectory estimation by learning sensor data relationships. Kalman filters, including variants like Double Stage Kalman Filter, offer superior estimation accuracy, reduced RMSE, and improved precision in joint monitoring, joint torque estimation, and trajectory calculations for IMUs in various dynamic scenarios. These filters play a crucial role in mitigating noise, enhancing accuracy, and optimizing performance in IMU-based systems across different fields.
How to create a battery ageging model in matlab?
5 answers
To create a battery aging model in MATLAB, one can utilize various approaches outlined in the research papers. Firstly, the model can be developed by estimating degradation rates through data fitting and optimization algorithms like Levenberg-Marquardt. Additionally, incorporating aging parameters into a pseudo-two-dimensional model can accurately describe battery physical information and track aging trajectories throughout the battery's life cycle. Furthermore, considering the effects of mutual interactions between cells and incorporating aging phenomena into the model can provide a more comprehensive simulation of single or multiple coupled cells' behavior. Finally, for state-of-charge estimation, a Kalman filter-based approach using a second-order RC equivalent circuit model can be implemented, considering temperature-dependent battery data and various filter algorithms.
Can swarm intelligence be used to solve complex problems in fields such as robotics and engineering?
5 answers
Swarm intelligence, as observed in natural systems, is being increasingly applied to fields like robotics and engineering. In swarm robotics, local rules coordinate groups of simple robots to solve complex tasks. Swarm drones, a subset of swarm robotics, leverage AI algorithms for swarm formation, task allocation, navigation, communication, and decision-making, revolutionizing their capabilities. Additionally, integrating swarm intelligence with deep learning can address challenges in real-world applications by leveraging the strengths of both approaches. Swarm intelligence-based methods are gaining attention for their potential to optimize complex problems efficiently, offering a new paradigm known as evolutionary machine learning or evolutionary deep learning. Therefore, the combination of swarm intelligence with AI techniques holds promise for enhancing problem-solving in robotics and engineering domains.
How do these traditional whale hunting methods compare to modern techniques in terms of harm inflicted on whales?
6 answers
Traditional whale hunting methods, as practiced by indigenous communities, often reflect a deep-rooted cultural significance and a reliance on sustainable practices that aim to minimize harm and ensure the survival of whale populations. For instance, the Aboriginal Whaling Management Procedure, which utilizes Kalman Filter methods for estimating stock size and setting strike limits, indicates a scientific approach to traditional hunting that seeks to balance cultural practices with conservation efforts. This contrasts with modern commercial whaling techniques, which have led to significant declines in whale populations due to overexploitation. The traditional hunting methods described in the contexts, such as those practiced by the Dayak Lun Dayeh community, involve specific techniques and rituals that respect the animals and their environment. These methods include using hunting dogs, sieging, or waiting at specific locations, and setting traps, which are likely less invasive and less harmful on a large scale compared to modern methods. Similarly, the Oroqen nationality's hunting culture, which has been impacted by modernization, suggests a shift from sustainable practices to potentially more harmful modern techniques. Modern whaling, particularly as it has evolved into commercial and sport activities, often involves technologies and practices that can lead to more efficient but also more extensive and indiscriminate killing of whales. This is evident in the international legal issues surrounding the Grindadrap tradition in the Faroe Islands, where the transition from a subsistence practice to a commercial and sport activity has led to international controversy and accusations of violating international conservation agreements. Moreover, the genetic consequences of whaling on the circumarctic bowhead whale population highlight the impact of both ancient and modern whaling practices, with modern techniques contributing to more significant population declines until the cessation of commercial whaling. This suggests that modern whaling techniques, driven by commercial motives, have inflicted more harm on whale populations compared to traditional methods, which were more aligned with sustainable and subsistence objectives. In summary, traditional whale hunting methods, as part of cultural practices, tend to incorporate sustainable approaches that aim to minimize harm to whale populations, in contrast to modern techniques that have led to significant ecological impacts and population declines.
What are the most common techniques used for single cell isolation from 3D multicellular spheroids?
5 answers
The most common techniques for single cell isolation from 3D multicellular spheroids include microfluidic chip technology, deep learning-based image segmentation, and the use of macro-probes in Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Microfluidic chips enable high-throughput single-cell isolation by matching flow resistance to isolate individual cells from cell suspensions. Deep learning models, such as ResNet-18, have been integrated into software like AnaSP for automatic segmentation of 2D spheroid images, facilitating morphological analysis. Macro-probes in AFM extend mechanical measurements to multicellular aggregates, allowing for the global rheology assessment of primary cardiomyocyte spheroids and monitoring beating force and pattern. These techniques collectively offer efficient and accurate methods for isolating single cells from 3D multicellular spheroids.
How does Platt scaling and isotonic regression improve the accuracy of histological staining analysis?
4 answers
Platt scaling, as demonstrated in the research by Gupta and Ramdas, enhances the calibration of models in both i.i.d. and non-i.i.d. settings with distribution drift, improving accuracy. Additionally, the incorporation of calibeating further boosts the robustness of Platt scaling, ensuring calibration for adversarial outcome sequences. On the other hand, Roohani and Kisshighlight the significance of stain normalization methods in histological staining analysis. By evaluating various normalization techniques like histogram equalization, Reinhart, Macenko, and Khan, they show that stain normalization significantly enhances the accuracy of nuclei segmentation algorithms, improving baseline segmentation accuracy by over 50% as measured by AUC and Recall. This demonstrates how both Platt scaling and stain normalization techniques play crucial roles in enhancing the accuracy of histological staining analysis.
What is the relationship between Platt scaling and isotonic regression in histology?
4 answers
Platt scaling and isotonic regression are both methods used in different contexts. Platt scaling, as discussed in Context_1 and Context_2, is an online post-hoc calibration technique that combines logistic regression with Platt scaling to adapt between different settings and enhance calibration. On the other hand, isotonic regression, as described in Context_3, focuses on enhancing trend tests by imposing a monotonicity constraint on dose-response functions. In the context of histology, specifically in cutaneous melanoma, the study in Context_4 found that the presence of histological regression did not play a prognostic role in nodal involvement or survival. Therefore, while Platt scaling deals with calibration in predictive modeling, isotonic regression is more focused on enhancing trend tests in dose-response analysis, showing their distinct applications in different domains.
What are some potential applications of Platt scaling and isotonic regression in the analysis of histological images?
5 answers
Platt scaling and isotonic regression techniques have promising applications in the analysis of histological images. Platt scaling, as demonstrated in the Online Platt Scaling (OPS) method, can be utilized for post-hoc calibration of image analysis algorithms, ensuring accurate and calibrated outcomes. Additionally, isotonic regression can aid in refining the calibration process, especially in scenarios where the initial model may be miscalibrated. These methods can enhance the characterization of histological images by providing calibrated predictions and improving the accuracy of image retrieval, classification, and annotation tasks. By incorporating Platt scaling and isotonic regression, histopathologists can benefit from more reliable and consistent analyses of tissue samples, ultimately advancing the efficiency and accuracy of histological image interpretation in biomedical research and clinical practice.
What is the difference between working memory and short term memory?
4 answers
Working memory and short-term memory (STM) are closely related but distinct cognitive functions. Working memory involves the maintenance and manipulation of temporary information for goal-directed behavior, encompassing attention-like control and short-term storage components. STM, on the other hand, refers to the temporary storage of information for immediate tasks, such as repeating nonwords or lists of digits, and is crucial for language processing and vocabulary acquisition. While working memory is associated with more complex cognitive processes like problem-solving and decision-making, STM is primarily involved in immediate recall tasks and language learning. Additionally, working memory is believed to have inelastic capacity limits that impact various activities, while STM limitations are crucial in parsing complexity and language processing. Both types of memory play essential roles in cognition, with working memory being more multifaceted and STM focusing on immediate retention tasks.