Is there a difference between self report and acceleromter assessed physical activity outcomes?
Best insight from top research papers
There is a notable difference between self-report and accelerometer-assessed physical activity outcomes. Studies have shown discrepancies in the measurements obtained through self-report questionnaires and accelerometers, with self-reports often overestimating vigorous physical activity but underestimating moderate and light physical activity levels. Additionally, the validity of self-report tools like the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children (PAQ-C) has been questioned, especially in younger children, highlighting the need for more objective assessment methods like accelerometers. The poor agreement between self-reported physical activity levels and accelerometer-assessed data suggests that these methods capture different aspects of physical activity and cannot be used interchangeably, emphasizing the importance of utilizing multiple measurement tools for a comprehensive understanding of individuals' activity levels.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Yes, there is a significant difference between self-reported physical activity outcomes using the PASE questionnaire and accelerometer-assessed physical activity in patients with cancer. | |
| Yes, the study found that self-reported physical activity outcomes using a questionnaire showed reasonable validity compared to accelerometer-assessed outcomes in epidemiologic studies. | |
34 Citations | Yes, there is a difference between self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity outcomes, with low correlation coefficients observed between the two methods in Latin American countries. |
12 May 2021 1 Citations | Yes, there are differences between self-report and accelerometer-assessed physical activity outcomes, with variations in moderate-to-vigorous and light intensity physical activity levels in upper elementary school children. |
09 Apr 2021 | Yes, there is a difference between self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity outcomes, especially in younger children, where wearable devices are preferred for more objective assessment. |
Related Questions
Is self-report data common in health research?4 answersSelf-report data is commonly used in health research, particularly as a measure of overall health status. However, the validity of self-reports can be questionable when assessing specific diseases like diabetes and hypertension, as they may understate the true disease burden significantly. In contrast, the trend of health self-tracking is growing, with individuals willingly disclosing their personal health data for research purposes. This willingness to donate data is influenced by factors such as age, frequency of vital sign tracking, privacy concerns, and past sharing behaviors. Overall, while self-report data is prevalent in health research, the accuracy and reliability of such data can vary depending on the specific health condition being studied.
What is self-report suvey in social sciences?8 answersA self-report survey in social sciences is a research method that involves collecting data directly from participants about their feelings, behaviors, attitudes, or perceptions. This method is particularly valuable for exploring aspects of human experience that are not easily observable from the outside, such as internal states, personal histories, or subjective experiences. Self-report surveys can be implemented through various means, including paper-based questionnaires, digital platforms, and even innovative technologies like smartwatches, which have shown to increase compliance among participants. Despite their widespread use, self-report surveys are not without limitations. They are subject to essential constraints, such as the accuracy of participants' self-assessment and the potential for response biases, which cannot be fully resolved through technical or methodological improvements.
The development of self-report inventories has evolved to address early criticisms, such as susceptibility to distortion and the empirical foundations of their interpretation. Modern approaches to constructing and interpreting these inventories strive to balance empirical and content-based interpretation methods, while also considering protocol validity to mitigate threats like nonresponding or biased responding. Innovations in mobile technology have further expanded the possibilities for self-reporting, offering new methods that can be more engaging and convenient for participants, thereby potentially improving the quality and quantity of data collected.
Moreover, self-report surveys have been adapted to measure complex and multidimensional constructs, such as gender identity, through tools like the Gender Self-Report (GSR), which demonstrates the method's flexibility and applicability across diverse research areas. However, the interpretation of self-report data can be challenging, necessitating sophisticated statistical models to account for factors like response uncertainty and the tendency towards socially desirable responding. Despite these challenges, self-report surveys remain a cornerstone of social science research, offering insights into the human condition that are difficult to capture through other means.
What are a self report questionnaires in clinical psychology?5 answersSelf-report questionnaires in clinical psychology are valuable tools for assessing mental health indicators. The Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) is commonly used to screen for common mental disorders. These questionnaires aid in identifying symptoms related to depression, anxiety, and other mental health conditions, allowing for efficient screening and treatment allocation. Additionally, utilizing online self-report questionnaires has shown feasibility and validity in monitoring psychiatric symptoms outside of clinical settings, benefiting patients with severe mental illnesses. Furthermore, generic self-reported questionnaires like the Patient Assessment of Self-Management Tasks and Partners in Health scale are essential for evaluating self-management strategies in individuals with chronic conditions, providing clinicians and researchers with comprehensive assessment tools.
Are self reports a challenge in research?5 answersSelf-reports are a challenge in research due to their limitations and potential biases. They introduce self-serving bias and common method variance, which can affect the accuracy of the data. Self-report data is subjective and prone to various response biases, making it less reliable as a ground truth for predicting human mental states. In the field of work and aging research, relying solely on self-report data limits the understanding of actual behaviors in age-diverse settings. In marketing research, self-reports can be problematic when submitted by inattentive or disengaged respondents, leading to poor-quality data that can bias statistical findings. Therefore, researchers are exploring alternative methods, such as other-ratings provided by workplace observers, to overcome the limitations of self-reports and improve the overall quality of research.
What are the drawbacks of using self-report data in research?5 answersSelf-report data in research has several drawbacks. One major issue is the potential for poor-quality data resulting from inattentive, disengaged, or mischievous respondents, which can significantly bias statistical findings and hinder scientific progress. Another drawback is the subjectivity and various response biases associated with self-report surveys, which can affect the reliability of the data. Additionally, the validity of self-report data is often questioned, despite being considered the gold standard, particularly when it comes to data of disproportionate minority contact in the juvenile justice system. To address these drawbacks, it is important to consider the confidence level of responses, survey completion time, and the use of multiple methods to ensure the effective use of self-reported data.
What is self-report bias?5 answersSelf-report bias refers to the systematic error that can occur in self-report surveys due to factors such as social desirability and reference bias. Self-report surveys are commonly used to measure various constructs in social science research, but they can be influenced by respondents' desire to present themselves in a favorable light or by differences in the implicit standards individuals use to evaluate their behavior. This bias can affect the validity and accuracy of the data collected, particularly when assessing socially sensitive constructs or symptoms of psychological injury. It is important for researchers to detect and minimize self-report bias to improve the quality of the data and the conclusions drawn from them. Techniques such as minimizing social desirability bias during the survey procedure and using statistical measurement methods can help mitigate the impact of self-report bias.