Should asymptomatic penetrating aortic ulcer be trated with tevar?
Best insight from top research papers
Treatment of asymptomatic penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) provides excellent clinical success and acceptable complication and reintervention rates. Scalloped TEVAR (scTEVAR) can be used to safely lengthen the proximal sealing zone and address more proximal pathologies . According to registry data, endovascular repair of PAU is technically feasible with acceptable perioperative outcomes . A hybrid procedure with partial debranching and thoracic endovascular repair of PAUs is a safe and less-invasive alternative for elderly, high-risk patients . TEVAR is a reliable treatment option for PAUs, with good outcomes and low rates of endoleaks . Therefore, TEVAR can be considered as a treatment option for asymptomatic PAUs, providing excellent clinical success and acceptable complication rates. However, further studies are needed to investigate long-term outcomes before invasive treatment of PAU disease in an elderly and comorbid patient population can be recommended .
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The provided paper does not specifically mention whether asymptomatic penetrating aortic ulcers should be treated with TEVAR. | |
| The paper does not specifically mention whether asymptomatic penetrating aortic ulcers should be treated with TEVAR. | |
1 Citations | The paper does not specifically address whether asymptomatic penetrating aortic ulcers should be treated with TEVAR. |
| The paper does not specifically mention whether asymptomatic penetrating aortic ulcers should be treated with TEVAR. |
Related Questions
What iaging protocol is used on an ultrasound to detect AAA?5 answersThe imaging protocol used on an ultrasound to detect Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) involves several key techniques and considerations, as highlighted by recent research. A standard approach includes using a 3.5- to 4-MHz scan head to measure the anteroposterior and transverse planes of the infrarenal aortic diameter, reporting the largest diameter observed. This method is underscored by its accuracy, noninvasiveness, and cost-effectiveness, making it a cornerstone in AAA screening protocols.
Further refinement in ultrasound imaging for AAA detection includes the assessment of perianeurysmal inflammation using a Siemens Acuson with a 6 MHz convex transducer in B-mode, which can identify inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (iAAA) by detecting a hypoechogenic cuff surrounding the aortic wall. This technique is particularly useful for early-stage detection and for patients with underlying systemic inflammatory diseases, such as IgG4-related disease, which is strongly associated with iAAA.
Recent advancements have also explored the utility of robotic platforms for autonomous ultrasound acquisitions, aiming at the quantitative assessment of the vessel diameter for AAA screening. This approach seeks to reduce inter-operator variability and improve the repeatability of ultrasound image acquisition. Additionally, the evolution of ultrasound technology has introduced 2D, 3D, and 4D contrast-enhanced ultrasound modalities, revolutionizing AAA management and postoperative surveillance by accurately measuring AAA diameter and volume, and detecting endoleaks with high sensitivity and specificity.
Standardized measurement methods, such as the leading-edge method with orthogonal slicing, are recommended for the most precise determination of aortic diameter, ensuring valid and reproducible results even when compared with computed tomography (CT). Moreover, novel ultrasonographic imaging techniques like 3D/4D ultrasound and image fusion have been compared to standard 2D ultrasound, showing adequate routine follow-up capabilities and improved endoleak characterization in selected cases.
In summary, the ultrasound imaging protocol for AAA detection encompasses a multifaceted approach that includes standard measurements of the aortic diameter, advanced techniques for identifying iAAA, and innovative technologies for enhancing accuracy and reducing variability in screening and follow-up examinations.
What are the current diagnostic criteria and treatment options for acute aortic syndrome?5 answersCurrent diagnostic criteria for acute aortic syndrome emphasize the importance of timely and accurate diagnosis to prevent catastrophic outcomes. Various imaging modalities such as echocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and aortography play a crucial role in confirming the diagnosis and detecting associated complications. Treatment options for acute aortic syndromes are individualized based on the location and extent of the aortic wall compromise, patient comorbidities, and the type of aortic pathology. Surgical interventions, including thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), are essential for type A aortic dissections, while medical management is often suitable for uncomplicated type B dissections. Multidisciplinary aortic programs have shown to enhance patient outcomes and are vital for long-term follow-up and management.
What are the medical imaging guidelines for size measurements in aortic diseases?5 answersAccurate and standardized aortic size measurements are crucial in the surveillance and management of aortic diseases. Guidelines emphasize the importance of consistent measurement techniques across imaging modalities like transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Discrepancies in measurements between modalities can impact clinical decisions, highlighting the need for uniformity in measurement protocols. While MRI offers advantages in visualizing the entire aorta without radiation exposure, CT and TTE remain valuable options, especially in cases where MRI is not feasible. Recommendations advocate for specific measurement methods, such as leading edge-to-leading edge measurements in TTE at end-diastole, to enhance reproducibility and accuracy in aortic dimension assessments. Standardized measurements and consistent comparisons over time are essential for timely intervention and prevention of complications in aortic diseases.
What is the epidemiology of aortic valvular diseases?4 answersAortic valvular diseases have a significant impact on global cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is increasing, especially among the elderly population. CAVD is the most common cardiac valve disorder, affecting millions of people worldwide. Rheumatic heart disease, another common valvular heart disease, is also on the rise, particularly in developing nations. Aortic valve stenotic disease is the most prevalent valvular pathology in developed countries, while mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation have also seen an increase. High systolic blood pressure is a leading risk factor for CAVD, and controlling blood pressure can help reduce the burden of the disease. Age is a significant factor in the epidemiology of aortic valvular diseases, with the prevalence and mortality rates increasing with age.
Is screening for asymptomatic HSV-2 infection recomended?5 answersScreening for asymptomatic HSV-2 infection is not universally recommended. The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) recommends against routine universal use of asymptomatic screening for SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare facilities, as it is of unclear benefit when added to other infection prevention measures. While serologic tests for HSV-2 have improved over the years, screening for HSV-2 infection with antibody testing is not indicated for asymptomatic adults or asymptomatic pregnant women. The benefit of screening for genital herpes is not clear-cut, as most people with the infection are asymptomatic and false positive results can occur. However, there may be situations where offering testing to asymptomatic patients with an HSV-positive partner, patients with HIV infection, and those with current or recent sexually transmitted infection or high-risk behavior could be considered.
Is TEC anomaly always preceded by ULF emission?3 answersULF emissions have been observed as earthquake precursors in multiple studies. These ULF emissions show anomalies in the geomagnetic data recorded by magnetometers, indicating a possible link between ULF emissions and earthquakes. However, it is important to note that not all studies specifically mention TEC (Total Electron Content) anomalies in relation to ULF emissions. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that TEC anomalies are always preceded by ULF emissions based on the abstracts provided. Further research and analysis would be needed to determine the relationship between TEC anomalies and ULF emissions in the context of earthquake prediction.