scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

What are the barriers and motivations for joining a conservationagreement? 


Best insight from top research papers

Barriers to joining a conservation agreement include concerns about perpetuity, loss of control, and lack of trust in managing organizations . Motivations for participation vary based on the stage of behavior change: precontemplators are hindered by lack of time, contemplators and actors by unawareness of behaviors. Precontemplators and contemplators are motivated by ease of behavior, while actors are motivated by reminders . Additionally, motivations for participating in perpetual conservation easements are often influenced by local-scale processes, with limited consideration of broader-scale influences . Understanding multifaceted motivations and barriers, such as collaboration, communication, and capacity building, is crucial for improving conservation practices and linking research with practice .

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
Barriers include lack of collaboration, communication, funding, and capacity. Motivations stem from diverse perspectives and expectations, emphasizing the importance of dialogue for effective conservation agreements.
Barriers to conservation easements in Montana include concerns about perpetuity, loss of control, and lack of trust in managing organizations. Motivations include protecting open space and resources.
Barriers and motivations for joining a conservation agreement include economic factors like crop price fluctuations, profitability changes, and labor reduction, which can both discourage and encourage adoption.
Barriers and motivations for joining conservation agreements include local-scale focus, lack of consideration for broader-scale influences, and gaps in understanding broader contextual factors.
Barriers include lack of time for precontemplators and unawareness for contemplators and actors. Motivations vary, with ease being common for precontemplators and contemplators, and reminders for actors.

Related Questions

What factors caused difficulty to attract funding for protected areas?5 answersDifficulty in attracting funding for protected areas stems from various factors. Firstly, the insufficient funding for protected areas globally poses a significant challenge, hindering effective management efforts. Additionally, the mismatch between public and private funding sources creates a funding gap, impacting the sustainability of financial support for protected areas. Moreover, the lack of resources and funding constraints lead to postponed management, inadequate monitoring, and insufficient coordination among agencies and natural areas professionals. Furthermore, the complexity of operating in specialized fields, limited in-house capacity, and the high costs associated with building necessary skills and capacities for effective management contribute to the funding difficulties faced by protected areas. These combined factors highlight the multifaceted challenges in securing adequate funding for protected areas.
What are the barriers and motivations for joining a conservation agreement?5 answersBarriers and motivations for joining a conservation agreement vary based on the individual's stage of change. Precontemplators commonly face a lack of time as a barrier, while contemplators and actors often struggle with being unaware of certain behaviors. In the context of corporate involvement in conservation agreements, it is argued that only countries should be formal parties to such agreements, as corporate participation could lead to conflicting standards, logistical challenges, and potential undermining of conservation goals. Additionally, a study on conservation compensation programs found that motivations for participating in such programs include financial, social, and environmental factors, while the program's success hinges on aligning with local intrinsic motivations and social norms.
What are the key factors that influence people's perception and acceptance of conservation programmes?4 answersPerceptions and acceptance of conservation programs are influenced by various factors. Clear property/resource boundaries are crucial for positive conservation perceptions. Local communities' willingness to contribute to biodiversity conservation, despite property loss and management costs, plays a significant role. Positive perceptions, rather than just scientific evidence, are essential for garnering local support and ensuring long-term conservation success. Understanding and incorporating local values and perceptions regarding conservation initiatives are vital for effective engagement. Factors such as the level of support from the public, economic and social conditions, cultural alignment, and the involvement of elite figures and governmental support also impact public perceptions of conservation efforts. Overall, a combination of clear boundaries, community willingness, positive perceptions, cultural alignment, and support from various stakeholders are key in shaping people's perception and acceptance of conservation programs.
What are the most pressing issues facing preventive conservation today?5 answersPreventive conservation faces several pressing issues today. One challenge is the need to address the environmental and financial sustainability of conservation practices, as well as the limited opportunities for conservators to specialize in preventive conservation. Another issue is the use of ethical arguments to guide or discourage interventive treatments, which has led to a greater proportion of conservators' time being dedicated to preventive conservation. Additionally, the conservation community must recognize and address the new challenges facing them, such as changing structures and the need to respond to ongoing changes in the conservation arena. Lastly, there is a need for effective conservation surveys or assessments to determine conservation priorities and develop strategies for addressing them.
What are the challenges to marine life conservation?2 answersThe challenges to marine life conservation include accessing field sites, knowledge gaps regarding biodiversity trends, high mobility of organisms in fluid environments, ecosystem-specific obstacles to stakeholder engagement and governance, pollution, unsustainable exploitation of marine resources, deep-sea mining, oil exploratory activities, bottom trawling, illegal fishing, marine plastic litter pollution, and the effects of aquaculture, acidification, and water quality. These challenges have led to biodiversity loss, depletion and degradation of marine habitats, and disruptions in species distribution and population size. Urgent and innovative global governance measures are needed to address these challenges and protect marine biodiversity.
How to convince critics for conservation?4 answersConservationists can convince critics by challenging the belief that environmental protection will harm the economy and by emphasizing the benefits of protecting nature for people's well-being and quality of life. They should reach out to new audiences across different spectrums and connect with their hearts, anxieties, and minds. It is important to communicate research findings to a wide and appropriate audience, ensuring that the results are clearly understandable. Conservationists should also highlight the successes of small community conservation projects, which view local rural people as the solution to habitat degradation, rather than the problem. By demonstrating the positive environmental improvements achieved through sustainability labels, conservationists can show that their efforts have produced tangible results worldwide.

See what other people are reading

Who developed self-efficacy theory?
5 answers
Self-efficacy theory was developed by Albert Bandura, as highlighted in multiple research papers. Bandura's theory emphasizes the significant impact of individuals' beliefs about their capabilities on their behavior. Self-efficacy, defined as people's judgments of their abilities to accomplish specific tasks, plays a crucial role in guiding human actions, thoughts, motivation, and affect in various domains of functioning. Bandura proposed that self-efficacy beliefs are shaped by four main sources: mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, social persuasions, and emotional and physiological states. Furthermore, self-efficacy is closely linked to actions influenced by one's feelings, thoughts, and motivation, impacting decisions related to opportunities and success.
What are the most effective stigma reduction interventions for crack cocaine users?
5 answers
Interventions aimed at reducing stigma related to substance use, particularly crack cocaine users, vary in their effectiveness. Research suggests that interventions targeting structural stigma show promise in producing sustained policy and practice changes. Contact-based interventions, commonly considered best practice in stigma reduction, have shown mixed results, with trials lacking methodological rigor and long-lasting effects. While some studies have indicated a small but significant positive impact on reducing structural stigma for substance use in general, interventions specifically tailored for crack cocaine users lack conclusive evidence of effectiveness. Therefore, a comprehensive approach that addresses both structural and individual-level stigmas, such as combining interventions targeting self-stigma and public stigma, may be beneficial in effectively reducing stigma for crack cocaine users within the criminal legal system.
How does the social cognitive theory affect the practitioner patient dynamic?
5 answers
The Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) plays a significant role in shaping the practitioner-patient dynamic by emphasizing factors such as behavior, personal beliefs, cognitive aspects, and the environment. SCT is utilized in various healthcare settings to enhance patient education and self-care practices, particularly in chronic conditions like diabetes mellitus and depression. It highlights the importance of self-efficacy, expectations, and self-control in influencing patient behavior and treatment compliance. Additionally, SCT underscores the role of mastery experiences in promoting positive changes in beliefs and behaviors, ultimately impacting the patient's perceived efficacy and agency in managing their health. By integrating SCT into clinical practice, practitioners can better understand and support patients in adopting healthier behaviors and improving treatment adherence, thereby positively influencing the practitioner-patient relationship.
Can oral sex techniques be improved through training or education, and if so, what methods are most effective?
5 answers
Training and education can indeed enhance oral sex techniques, as seen in various studies. A study on oral health education for school teachers showed a significant improvement in knowledge after a training program. Similarly, a multi-tiered oral health education program for care staff led to increased knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy, and behavior scores. Furthermore, a study on sexuality education training for teenage girls demonstrated a significant improvement in self-protection knowledge from sexual harassment after the training. Additionally, a training program for asthma patients improved oral health, inhaler use skills, and promoted positive behavior changes, indicating the effectiveness of education in enhancing skills and behaviors related to health issues. These findings suggest that structured training and education programs can effectively improve oral sex techniques through enhancing knowledge, skills, and attitudes.
What are the primary factors that influence the investment attractiveness of a company?
5 answers
The primary factors influencing the investment attractiveness of a company include its financial capabilities, potential for growth, market competitiveness, and management strategies. Factors such as property status, liquidity, solvency, financial stability, and business activity are crucial in assessing investment attractiveness. Additionally, the effective use of production potential, market opportunities, and the ability to adapt to market needs play a significant role in determining investment attractiveness. ESG performance, including environmental, social, and governance pillars, also impacts investment attractiveness, with higher ESG scores positively influencing company valuation and cost of capital. Overall, a combination of financial health, growth potential, market competitiveness, and ESG performance are key determinants of a company's investment attractiveness.
What are philosophical roots of Niklas luhmann?
4 answers
The philosophical roots of Niklas Luhmann's theory are deeply embedded in a rich tapestry of intellectual traditions, reflecting a synthesis of ideas from sociology, philosophy, and systems theory. Luhmann's engagement with the cybernetics movement significantly influenced the development of his systems theory, particularly through the concept of self-reference, which encompasses self-regulation, self-organization, self-observation, and self-production. His theoretical framework also draws upon the holistic nature of system theory, neo-functionalism, and radical constructivism, finding inspiration in natural sciences while positioning itself close to German philosophical idealism, notably influenced by Max Weber’s individualist-oriented approach. Luhmann's theory is recognized for its critical and anti-totalitarian potential, demonstrating its philosophical depth by engaging with concepts that challenge totalitarian narratives. Despite the absence of specific references to philosophical functionalism, Luhmann’s sociological functionalism, particularly his equivalence functionalism, dialogues with philosophical functionalism, offering solutions to the problem of functional reduction of theories. His theory's post-structuralist characteristics further reveal its philosophical underpinnings, influenced by the theoretical and philosophical factors that led to the crisis of metaphysics and scientific determinism. Influences from Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger, and Talcott Parsons are evident in Luhmann’s proposal of a theory of societal modernity based on a postontological understanding of social meaning, integrating law, political philosophy, and society into his analysis. Luhmann’s work represents a deconstruction and reconfiguration of traditional paradigms, notably through his development of the theory of self-referential and autopoietic systems, which challenges outdated notions such as ontology, teleology, and anthropocentrism. His theory’s capacity for universal applicability and self-referentiality, capable of encompassing all social phenomena, further underscores its philosophical sophistication. Lastly, Luhmann’s focus on the functional analysis of the system-environment relationship and the complexity difference between these elements, through the lens of autopoiesis, marks a significant departure from European sociological and philosophical traditions, showcasing his innovative contribution to sociological theory.
What are the key factors that influence the decision-making process of the committee responsible for managing public health?
4 answers
The decision-making process of committees managing public health is influenced by several key factors. Factors include the need for a systematic, complete, and normative system with a coordinated working mechanism and a comprehensive team equipped with medical and legal knowledge. Additionally, trust, cooperation, governance structure, representation, expertise of participants, and issue contents play crucial roles in public participation in health care policy-making. Moreover, individual choices impacting health, the effectiveness of public health interventions, and the societal influence on decision-making are significant factors to consider. Furthermore, in emergency situations like radiological disasters, timely decision-making based on simulations and historical data is vital to protect public health and reduce adverse effects. These factors collectively shape the decision-making processes of committees managing public health.
How does the relationship between self-esteem and mental health outcomes vary across different population groups?
4 answers
The relationship between self-esteem and mental health outcomes varies across different population groups. Research indicates that self-esteem plays a significant role in both obesity and mental health outcomes. Furthermore, studies among second-generation immigrant adolescents suggest that self-esteem mediates the relationship between perceived discrimination and depression symptoms, with variations across ethnic sub-groups. Additionally, the presence of a child with mental retardation in a family can lead to lower self-esteem levels among parents, especially mothers, impacting their mental health. Overall, self-esteem, defined as valuing oneself and viewing oneself as having worth, influences mental health outcomes differently based on factors like ethnicity, family circumstances, and individual experiences.
How has vygotskys theory been used in the classroom?
4 answers
Vygotsky's theory has been applied in various educational settings to enhance learning experiences. Teachers play a crucial role in implementing Vygotsky's Socio-Cultural Theory (SCT) by fostering meaningful interactions among students. This theory emphasizes the importance of socializing in cognitive development, where individuals' internal functions are shaped through social interactions and collaborative activities. By utilizing active learning strategies and encouraging student participation, teachers facilitate knowledge acquisition and skill development within a social context. Additionally, Vygotsky's ideas have influenced the use of problem-solving methodologies in virtual learning environments, such as in Chemistry Teaching, to promote interactive learning experiences that engage students in dialogue and collaborative problem-solving. Overall, Vygotsky's theory has been instrumental in creating dynamic and engaging classroom environments that promote social, cultural, and cognitive development among students.
What is the definition of risk in the context of finance and investment?
5 answers
Risk in the context of finance and investment encompasses various dimensions. It can be viewed as the uncertainty surrounding future outcomes, leading to potential losses or gains. Financial professionals often assess risk using the concept of "risk-free," which refers to bonds from powerful states expected not to default, setting a standard for financial value. Different measures of risk include variance, standard deviation, semi-standard deviation, and value at risk, with perceptions varying among investors based on portfolio composition and risk attitudes. Additionally, risk can be seen as a deviation from expected returns, with positive risk presenting opportunities and negative risk necessitating risk management strategies. Overall, risk plays a crucial role in shaping investment decisions and financial behaviors, influenced by factors like risk tolerance levels and attitudes towards digital financial services.
What is strategic leadership in strategic management?
5 answers
Strategic leadership in strategic management refers to a leader's capacity to anticipate, envision, and facilitate strategic changes while enabling others to do the same. It involves absorbing knowledge, perceiving the business environment, and emphasizing experimentation and risk-taking in the learning process. Scholars have linked strategic leadership to various Human Resource Management variables like work stress, commitment, and role conflict, highlighting the importance of developing reliable measurement tools to understand its dimensions. Strategic leadership is crucial in navigating predictable yet drastic changes in the competitive landscape, requiring senior management teams to mobilize organizations effectively in response to environmental shifts. In the context of globalization, strategic leadership is seen as essential for long-term organizational success, with a focus on determining development direction, setting goals, and promoting top managers' objectives. Strategic leadership is viewed as a critical instrument that integrates organizational efforts, coordinates actions, and shapes a desirable future in interaction with the organizational environment.