What are the challenges in using incremental dynamic analysis for studying the seismic response of structures?
Best insight from top research papers
Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is a method used to study the seismic response of structures. However, there are several challenges associated with its use. One challenge is the selection of ground motions for the analysis, as different ground motions can lead to different results . Another challenge is the modeling decisions made for the structure, such as the choice of constitutive models for the building elements. These modeling decisions can also affect the results of the IDA . Additionally, the determination of the collapse risk and fragility functions of a structure using IDA can be influenced by various factors, including the ground motion selection and the modeling decisions made . Therefore, careful consideration and investigation of these factors are necessary when using IDA for studying the seismic response of structures.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The provided paper does not explicitly mention the challenges in using incremental dynamic analysis for studying the seismic response of structures. | |
01 Jan 2021 | The paper does not explicitly mention the challenges in using incremental dynamic analysis for studying the seismic response of structures. |
| The provided paper does not mention any challenges in using incremental dynamic analysis for studying the seismic response of structures. | |
| The provided paper does not mention the challenges in using incremental dynamic analysis for studying the seismic response of structures. | |
19 Dec 2022 | The paper does not mention any challenges in using incremental dynamic analysis for studying the seismic response of structures. |
Related Questions
What are challenges in construction?5 answersChallenges in the construction industry encompass various aspects such as resource allocation, time management, cost control, quality assurance, safety measures, project complexity, changes, uncertainties, and communication issues. Quality management during the execution phase significantly impacts the final outcome of construction projects, with factors affecting quality including major issues, proactive measures, and the need for improvement. Additionally, challenges related to construction materials, equipment, manpower, and management practices contribute to cost overruns and delays, highlighting the importance of understanding these challenges to enhance efficiency and productivity in the industry. The complexity of measuring construction activities further adds to the challenges, with variations in national accounting methods complicating industry comparisons across different countries.
Why the study of induced earthquakes is challenging?4 answersThe study of induced earthquakes is challenging due to various factors outlined in the provided contexts. Induced seismicity, triggered by activities like fluid injection for energy purposes, poses risks of unexpected large-magnitude events. Understanding the causal mechanisms behind fluid injection-induced earthquakes is complex, with the need to consider pore pressure changes, fault weakening, and earthquake interactions. Additionally, the manifestation of liquefaction caused by earthquakes adds to the complexity, as it involves the loss of soil strength and stiffness, leading to damages on structures and ground surfaces. Furthermore, the unpredictability of induced seismic events and the necessity to forecast and mitigate risks to prevent damage and ensure public safety contribute to the overall challenge of studying induced earthquakes.
What are the structural damage limitations to say that a URM is going to experience progressive collapse?5 answersTo determine if an Unreinforced Masonry (URM) building is prone to progressive collapse, structural damage limitations must be considered. Research indicates that damage accumulation during seismic sequences is often underestimated, with existing engineering demand parameters (EDPs) failing to capture evolving damage levels in subsequent events. Notably, studies emphasize the importance of energy-based parameters and component-based methodologies for accurate damage estimation in URMs and Reinforced Concrete Frame buildings. Furthermore, the susceptibility to progressive collapse is influenced by factors like column removal time, joint displacement, and rotation criteria, with braced framed systems showing higher collapse potential compared to moment resisting frames. Understanding these structural damage limitations is crucial for assessing the risk of progressive collapse in URM buildings.
What are the challenges of using BIM for condition assessment of structures and facility management?5 answersThe challenges of using BIM for condition assessment of structures and facility management include the lack of precise guidelines and standards for ease of use, interoperability, and maintainability of BIM models for facility operation and maintenance. BIM models developed for design and construction phases often contain excessive details and lack the necessary information for building operations. There is a limited understanding of how BIM can effectively support existing facility management activities and its impact on design and construction processes, leading to difficulties in defining clear and efficient information requirements. The slow uptake of BIM in the facilities and asset management industry is another challenge, resulting in a lack of trained personnel and inadequate data provision for maintenance and management of facilities. Deficiencies in BIM regulations and standards, inaccurate information exchanges, software interoperability issues, and unclear requirement definitions also contribute to challenges in BIM-FM asset integration.
How can non-linear analysis be used to improve the seismic performance of building structures?5 answersNon-linear analysis can be used to improve the seismic performance of building structures by understanding their behavior and designing appropriate isolation systems. Traditional linear building isolation systems, such as base isolation and inter-storey isolation systems, have been commonly used. However, non-linear building isolation systems offer additional advantages. Non-linear stiffness isolators, such as Quasi-Zero Stiffness isolators and Non-linear Energy Sink, can provide enhanced performance. Non-linear damping isolators, including power-law viscous dampers and magnetorheological dampers, can also improve the seismic response of structures. Additionally, non-linear analysis techniques, such as the modal stick method, can accurately simulate the non-linear behavior of structures under seismic loads. These approaches allow for a better understanding of the structural response and can lead to the design of more resilient and safer buildings.
How can I analyse the low velocity impact on structure?5 answersTo analyze low velocity impact on structures, finite element analysis can be used. This method allows for the determination of maximum energy absorption and damage modes in different types of sandwich structures. The impact resistance of the structure can be improved by modifying the design, such as changing the wall thickness distribution of the cores or moving the inner panel. Additionally, the type and thickness of the cores and facesheets, as well as interfacial reinforcement techniques, can influence the impact load and energy absorption of the sandwich structure. Delamination is a common type of impact damage in facesheets, and its behavior is dependent on the type of facesheet used. It is also important to consider the role of fluid structure interaction when analyzing low velocity impact on composite materials, especially in marine applications.