What are the most recent cost benefit pharmacoeconomic study that apply cheers criteria?
Best insight from top research papers
The most recent cost-benefit pharmacoeconomic studies that apply the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) criteria include research on newer antidiabetic medications and drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Studies on antidiabetic medications found that most newer medications were cost-effective compared to insulin, thiazolidinediones, and sulfonylureas . Similarly, research on postmenopausal osteoporosis drugs reported favorable cost-effectiveness, with industry-funded studies showing higher quality scores compared to non-industry funded ones . However, there are concerns about the methodology used in health technology cost-effectiveness assessments, with calls for a new paradigm focusing on evaluable single-attribute value claims rather than assumption-driven simulated claims . The CHEERS criteria have been updated in 2022 to incorporate recent methodological advances and stakeholder involvement, aiming to improve the reporting quality of health economic evaluations .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Not addressed in the paper. | |
3 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
7 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
| The most recent cost-benefit pharmacoeconomic studies applying CHEERS criteria reviewed newer antidiabetic medications, finding them cost-effective compared to insulin, TZDs, and sulfonylureas. | |
4 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
Related Questions
What the health economic evaluation of opiates?5 answersHealth economic evaluation of opiates involves assessing the costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions for opioid use disorder and opioid dependence. Economic evaluations help inform decision-making and resource allocation in addressing the opioid crisis. These evaluations consider the magnitude and geographical distribution of the epidemic, its intersection with other epidemics, its rapidly changing dynamics, and its multi-sectoral causes and consequences. Different modelling approaches, such as Markov models, decision trees, and dynamic transmission models, have been used to evaluate the economic impact of opioid agonist therapy for non-prescription opioid dependence. Economic evaluations also play a role in the prevention of opioid use disorder, providing information on the costs, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of prevention interventions. Stakeholders, including substance use treatment providers and payers, can use economic evaluations to efficiently allocate resources and make informed decisions about adopting specific therapies. However, there is a need for more research on the cost effectiveness of treatments for opiate dependence, including the role of psychosocial and behavioral interventions.
What research design is appropriate for cost-benefit analysis?3 answersCost-benefit analysis can be conducted using a mixed methods research design that incorporates both quantitative and qualitative methods. This approach allows for the quantification of costs and benefits using data from retrospective case-control studies, while also exploring the perceptions of stakeholders through focus groups, interviews, and surveys. Additionally, cost benefit analysis compares policy strategies based on their overall impact, including economic, social, and environmental factors. It relies on concepts such as Pareto-optimality and Kaldor-Hicks compensation to assess the global benefits or detriments of public programs. The analysis also considers the equivalent money values of all effects and incorporates discounted values to account for the well-being of future generations. Sensitivity analysis can be used to examine variations in cash flows, assumptions, and evaluation setup, while mean-variance analysis can compare the performance and risk of different strategies.
What are the benefits and costs of tourism?5 answersTourism has both benefits and costs. The economic benefits of tourism include generating substantial economic benefits for both host countries and tourists' home countries, contributing to economic activity in the region, and promoting economic progress in developing countries. However, there are also economic costs associated with tourism, such as direct costs incurred by tourism businesses and government costs for infrastructure, as well as hidden costs like high inflation, import leakages, and overdependence, which can have unfavorable economic effects on the host community. Additionally, tourism can impose costs on the host country, including increased pollution, congestion, and despoliation of fragile environments, and intra-generational inequity aggravation. It is important to consider both the benefits and costs of tourism when assessing its impact on an economy.
How do different alternative valuation criteria affect the results of a cost benefit analysis?3 answersDifferent alternative valuation criteria can have an impact on the results of a cost-benefit analysis. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods, for example, offer a framework for integrated valuation of ecosystem services and can account for multiple dimensions of well-being, including ecological, economic, cultural, and moral aspects. MCDA has been found to perform better than traditional monetary valuation techniques in several aspects of ecosystem service valuation, such as facilitating open and transparent public debate on alternative courses of action and considering the distribution of gains and losses across beneficiaries. Additionally, nonmonetary benefits can be incorporated into cost-benefit evaluation by comparing the worth of a nonmonetary return to a given dollar cost, allowing for the selection of the alternative with the best benefits minus costs. However, it is important to note that MCDA may not provide representative information on the values of the wider population.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using alternative valuation criteria in cost benefit analysis?5 answersThe advantages of using alternative valuation criteria in cost-benefit analysis (CBA) include the ability to account for multiple dimensions of well-being, facilitate transparent public debate, and consider the distribution of gains and losses across beneficiaries of ecosystem services. Alternative valuation criteria, such as contingent market methods, can generate data that align more closely with economic theory and help address estimation and interpretation difficulties introduced by confounding variables. However, a major disadvantage is the lack of detailed analytical knowledge on how expectations are formed, which makes it difficult to refute empirical propositions established from contingent markets. Additionally, CBA has limitations in terms of non-substitutability of essential goods, irreversibility, long-term effects, and inter-generational fairness. Experimental methods like the multiple price list format, while transparent and incentivizing truthful revelation, have limitations in terms of eliciting only interval responses and susceptibility to framing effects.
Which successful forms of treatment for metabolic syndrome are the most cost effective?5 answers