What are the risks of impulsive adoption innovation in healthcare?
Best insight from top research papers
Impulsive adoption of innovation in healthcare can lead to various risks. These risks include unexpected consequences due to changes in leadership, difficulties in implementing new functionalities, security issues arising from the introduction of new devices, and challenges in communication control . Additionally, resistance to adopting innovative technologies in healthcare can stem from concerns about security and privacy risks to patient data, integration challenges, and the potential loss of control over data to cloud providers . The slow uptake of beneficial technologies, like the Venner-PneuX system for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia, highlights the challenge of adoption in healthcare systems and the importance of creating environments that facilitate the understanding and utilization of innovations by healthcare professionals and organizations .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
01 Apr 2016 | Impulsive adoption of innovation in healthcare can lead to risks like low awareness, slow uptake, and ineffective integration, hindering patient care improvement and organizational support. |
23 Jun 2008 | Impulsive adoption of innovation in healthcare can lead to challenges due to the complexity of healthcare networks, including regulatory issues, cost containment, and incentivizing conservative service providers. |
01 May 2016 | Not addressed in the paper. |
1 Citations | Risks of impulsive adoption of innovation in healthcare include unexpected consequences like leadership changes, difficulty in adapting to varied practices, security issues, and communication challenges. |
| Risks of impulsive adoption of innovation in healthcare include lower quality care, loss of market share, missed efficiency opportunities, patient safety concerns, and regulatory compliance challenges. |
Related Questions
What are the challenges of AI adoption in healthcare?5 answersThe adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare, while promising, faces several significant challenges. One of the primary concerns is data privacy, as the integration of AI into healthcare systems involves handling sensitive patient information, raising issues around confidentiality and security. Regulatory compliance also poses a challenge, with stringent requirements that must be met to ensure AI applications are safe and effective for clinical use. Ethical considerations, such as the potential for bias and discrimination in AI algorithms, further complicate its adoption, necessitating careful scrutiny and ongoing validation to prevent harm to patients.
The integration of early-stage AI technologies into clinical practice is hindered by a lack of knowledge regarding health system technology procurement protocols, demanding regulatory and validation requirements, and challenges within the health system technology procurement process itself. Additionally, early-stage digital health companies face disadvantages compared to large technology conglomerates, making it difficult for them to navigate the healthcare landscape.
Another challenge is the hesitancy among healthcare workers to replace traditional practices with AI-driven solutions, stemming from concerns over job security and the effectiveness of AI in complex clinical settings. Infrastructure challenges, such as power and network connectivity, especially in marginalized communities, limit the global impact and accessibility of healthcare AI solutions.
Moreover, the healthcare industry faces barriers such as additional workload and problems with adopting technology, which impact the rate at which AI is adopted. The need for a skilled workforce and the maintenance of support systems are also significant challenges that healthcare providers must overcome to fully leverage AI technologies.
In summary, while AI has the potential to revolutionize healthcare, its adoption is fraught with challenges ranging from ethical and regulatory issues to technical and infrastructural barriers, all of which must be addressed to realize its full potential.
Are incremental innovations more sustainable than disruptive innovations in healthcare?4 answersIncremental innovations are often considered more sustainable than disruptive innovations in healthcare. While disruptive innovations can bring about rapid changes and paradigm shifts, incremental innovations focus on making gradual improvements to existing processes or services without completely overhauling them. This approach allows for a smoother transition, reduces resistance to change, and maintains the core functions of healthcare practices. Incremental innovation is accessible to practices of all sizes and can help them preserve their competitive advantage. On the other hand, disruptive innovations, although transformative, may face challenges in terms of acceptance, implementation, and integration into existing systems. Therefore, in the context of healthcare, incremental innovations are often perceived as more sustainable due to their ability to build upon existing foundations and adapt to evolving needs over time.
What might lead to innovations being adopted too quickly in healthcare?5 answersIn healthcare, innovations might be adopted too quickly due to various factors. One significant reason is the pressure to keep up with competitors who are more willing to embrace new technologies, leading to hasty adoption. Additionally, the urgency to address critical needs, such as those arising from an aging population, chronic diseases, or sudden global pandemics like COVID-19, can push for rapid adoption of innovations. The desire to capitalize on intellectual property and commercialize new ideas for financial gain can also drive swift adoption of technologies within healthcare systems. However, adopting innovations too quickly without thorough evaluation can result in negative consequences, such as compromising patient safety, facing regulatory compliance challenges, and hindering the effective integration of new technologies into existing healthcare processes.
What barriers are there to adoption of innovation?5 answersBarriers to the adoption of innovation include a wide array of challenges at both intra-organizational and interorganizational levels. These barriers encompass factors such as incompatibility with organizational strategies, structural impediments, resource constraints, lack of fit with organizational culture, decision-making challenges, and active resistance from customers. Additionally, barriers can arise from uncertainty in learning and implementation, differences in production systems, regulatory disparities, variation in local contexts, and the nature of embedded knowledge in diverse organizational settings. The literature also highlights obstacles like lack of policies promoting innovative practices, epistemic closure, unfavorable regulations, and unskilled labor. Moreover, risk aversion, high costs, and slow adoption rates hinder the uptake of sustainable water-efficient innovations in sectors like agriculture.
What are the risks and benefits of creating “risky” new roles in healthcare?3 answersCreating "risky" new roles in healthcare can have both risks and benefits. On the one hand, introducing new roles can help reshape and enhance the nursing workforce, meeting patient needs and increasing efficiency. It can also provide opportunities for healthcare organizations to be more responsive to consumer demands and improve patient care. On the other hand, there are risks involved in introducing new roles. It requires careful planning and consideration to ensure that the new roles are well thought-out and aligned with the goals of the healthcare organization. Additionally, there may be risks associated with the practice of preventive health behavior, which need to be addressed to create risk-sensitive patients and health professionals. Therefore, while creating new roles in healthcare can bring benefits, it is important to manage the associated risks effectively.
What are the challenges of being risk-averse in the healthcare industry?4 answersBeing risk-averse in the healthcare industry poses several challenges. One challenge is the cost of risk management, which leads many health plans and providers to transfer risk to other entities. Another challenge is the need for complete information about patients' health status and the availability of effective medical treatment to improve return on assets. Additionally, the complexity of potential risks in healthcare, such as errors in medication and clinical procedures, makes identifying and assessing risks challenging. Furthermore, the growing number of issues facing the healthcare industry, such as regulatory and technological changes, creates a broad array of perils for risk managers. Finally, the emphasis on risk assessment and management in healthcare systems can lead to a pressure to move from decisions grounded in tacit knowledge to those based on clinical guidelines or computer-based decision support systems, disregarding the reality of professional decision-making.