Search or ask a question

What is Aristotle's eudaimonia?

Best insight from top research papers

Aristotle's concept of eudaimonia, rooted in his philosophical work Nicomachean Ethics, emphasizes living up to one's fullest potential to achieve flourishing and happiness . Eudaimonia involves the balance between virtue and the realization of one's capabilities, contrasting with mere pleasure-seeking (hedonia) . Aristotle's view intertwines the importance of reason, practical rationality, and theoretical contemplation in achieving happiness, with the intellect (nous) being central to human essence and contributing significantly to eudaimonia . This holistic approach to happiness, encompassing virtue, reason, and the fulfillment of potential, underscores Aristotle's belief in a life well-lived through the harmonious development of one's virtues and capacities within a broader societal context.

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Book Chapter•DOI Aristotle on<i>Eudaimonia</i>,<i>Nous</i>, and Divinity Prathama Banerjee 27 Oct 2022	Aristotle's eudaimonia is linked to the godlike capacity of intellect (nous) contributing to happiness in his ethics, emphasizing practical reason over contemplation as the main focus.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI The concept of eudaimonia in the context of Aristotelian rational theology Roman Svetlov 01 Jan 2022-Voprosy teologii	Aristotle's eudaimonia is interpreted as living in accordance with nature, with the mind playing a central role, leading to the highest form of happiness through intellectual contemplation.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Refining the Concept of Eudaimonia Zeyuan Wei 17 May 2023-Communications in Humanities Research	Aristotle's eudaimonia is a concept of ultimate happiness combining subjectivism and objectivism, criticized by Kraut for rigidity and praised by Sizer for affect theory integration.
Book Chapter•DOI Eudaimonia and flourishing Gholnecsar E. Muhammad, Suvanova Dilnura Kurbanovna - Show less +1 more 01 Jan 2023	Aristotle's eudaimonia is the concept of living up to one's fullest potential to achieve flourishing, as discussed in Aristotelian philosophy and studied by psychological scientists for its benefits on well-being.
Book Chapter•DOI <i>Eudaimonia</i> (Happiness) Alan E. Kurschner 26 Jan 2023	Aristotle's eudaimonia is the connection between virtue and happiness, emphasizing long-term fulfillment over short-term pleasures, as discussed in Shakespeare's works within a broader natural philosophy context.

My columns

Related Questions

What is relation between Aristotle?5 answersAristotle had a significant influence on Alexander the Great, who was both his student and friend. They had contradictory attitudes in various realms, including military affairs, political perspectives, and sets of values. Despite their differences, Alexander inherited some of Aristotle's thoughts and developed innovative ideas of his own. Aristotle is known as the founder of not only logic but also ontology, which he describes in his works. He developed two different logics: the early dialectical logoi and the later formal syllogistic. These logics have influenced modern symbolic logic, which is considered a theory of general objects. Aristotle's ontology can be seen as a prolegomenon to logic, and the relationship between ontology and logic is explored in this paper. Aristotle's definition of the soul is connected to the particularities of a complex physical body, which helps resolve inconsistencies in his hylomorphic theory. This paper provides a comprehensive and consistent interpretation of Aristotle's hylomorphism, aligning it with today's scientific conception of the world. Aristotle's syllogisms in the Organon may have included relations, which can be modeled using combinatory logic. This paper explores the composition of relations and predicates in Aristotle's work. Aristotle establishes a close relationship between politics and ethics, as politics allows for the knowledge of supreme goodness and virtuous action, which leads to happiness. The final goal of ethics and the city is ultimately happiness, according to Aristotle.

How does Aristotle's theory of action compare to other theories of action?4 answersAristotle's theory of action differs from other theories in several ways. According to Aristotle, intentional action is a natural change that is treated as an exception to his four causes of natural changes. He also argues that akratic actions, which are actions against one's commitment to act in accordance with one's correct conception of ends, can be distinct from actions against one's decision to perform a particular action. Additionally, Aristotle's conception of humans as social or political animals suggests that the aims and ends of actions, as well as the means to bring them about through collective agency, are the result of practice and shared understanding from early on. Furthermore, Aristotle's view on action is grounded in the idea that nutrition is the most fundamental life activity, supporting all other activities, and that different souls (vegetable, animal, and rational) correspond to different life activities.

What is Euality?5 answersEquality refers to the state of being equal in rights, opportunities, and treatment. It is a concept that is crucial for the functioning of societies and the well-being of individuals. In the context of early childhood education, the Indonesian government has recognized the importance of quality education and has implemented national standards to ensure that all children have access to high-quality education. In the European Union, the concept of equality is closely linked to the idea of "united in diversity," which emphasizes the rights of EU citizens to cross borders and live and work in other EU countries, as well as the inclusion of national minorities. The intersection of gender and ethnic diversity is also a key aspect of equality, and it is important to assess how political actors in the European Public Sphere address these issues. Overall, equality is a fundamental principle that should be upheld in all aspects of society to ensure fairness and justice for all individuals.

What is eutetic?3 answersEutectic refers to a mixture or alloy that has the lowest melting point of any composition in the system. It is formed when two or more components are combined in specific proportions to create a new material with unique properties. Eutectic mixtures have been studied in various fields, including solvents, cosmetics, biodiesel production, and solidification of alloys. In the context of solvents, deep eutectic solvents (DES) have gained attention for their "green" properties and potential applications in catalysis, organic synthesis, and material chemistry. In cosmetics, a eutectic mixture is used as a carrier for active agents in alcohol-free foams. In biodiesel production, a eutectic mixture of choline chloride and ethylene glycol is used to purify waste cooking oil. In the solidification of alloys, eutectic growth is studied to understand microstructure formation and phase compositions.

What is the importance of aristotle virtue ethics?5 answersAristotle's virtue ethics is important for several reasons. Firstly, it provides a framework for building an ethical character and promoting ethical conduct in social workers and students. Secondly, Aristotle's conception of human well-being and virtue, as well as his ethical naturalism, have been influential throughout history and continue to be influential today. Additionally, virtue ethics offers an alternative to moral theories that emphasize moral obligation and law, focusing instead on the individual and their virtues. Furthermore, the revival of virtue ethics has not only led to a new approach to normative ethics but also to new Aristotelian approaches to metaethics and moral psychology, which explore the concept of natural goodness and its application to living things. Finally, in the context of the Anthropocene, Aristotelian virtue ethics provides unique insights and suggestions for ethics and sustainability, particularly in the private sector.

What is the definition of Agamospermy?1 answersAgamospermy refers to the process of asexual seed production in flowering plants, where seeds are formed without fertilization. It typically involves the development of an unreduced megagametophyte and the parthenogenetic development of the egg cell into an embryo. Agamospermy can occur in various plant species, including Fragaria vesca, Cuscutaceae, Orobanchaceae, Apiaceae, Erigeron annuus, Erythroxylum undulatum, and Garcinia. It is often associated with polyploidy and is more commonly observed in polyploid plants. Agamospermy can be facultative, where sexual reproduction can still occur, or it can be obligate, where sexual reproduction is absent. The occurrence of agamospermy has implications for plant evolution, agricultural manipulation, and the development of new types of fruit.

See what other people are reading

What is egoism?

Egoism refers to a philosophical concept that revolves around self-interest and self-centeredness. It can be viewed from various perspectives such as psychological egoism, ethical egoism, and rational egoism. Psychological egoism posits that individuals always act to maximize their self-interests, while ethical egoism suggests that individuals should solely act to maximize their ultimate self-interest. Rational egoism goes further to claim that irrationality lies in not pursuing one's self-interest. Ayn Rand's interpretation of ethical egoism emphasizes intellectual egoism and rationalism. Additionally, the concept of ego-altruism presents a contrasting view, advocating for a balance between self-interest and concern for others. Egoism can manifest differently, ranging from healthy self-care to extreme forms like narcissism and psychopathy.What strategies does working students use to balance academic requirements and job responsibilities?

Working students employ various strategies to balance academic requirements and job responsibilities. These strategies include utilizing temporal and communicative boundary management techniques to manage roles effectively. Additionally, they may opt to refrain from work-related tasks at home, share problems with family members, and remain calm and determined to cope with challenges. Furthermore, working students often resort to assertiveness, regular exercise, diet monitoring, and planned absences from work and school to deal with stress associated with combining academic and employment activities. Moreover, non-cognitive factors such as Psychological Capital, time management, and grit play a crucial role in enhancing flourishing and reducing the intention to quit studies among working students. Lastly, a preference for multitasking, known as polychronicity, serves as a resource in balancing work and school demands, thereby decreasing academic emotional exhaustion.How is flow related to well-being?

Flow, a state of complete absorption in rewarding activities, is closely linked to well-being. Research indicates that flow experiences predict increased positive emotions and satisfaction with life. Flow can lead to improved mood, goal attainment, and potentially invoke meditative states, contributing to enhanced well-being. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, flow experiences were associated with higher emotional well-being among adolescents, suggesting the importance of promoting flow even in adverse circumstances. Furthermore, flow has been found to positively impact subjective well-being, with its association mediated by factors like academic self-efficacy and self-esteem. Overall, fostering flow states through engaging activities can lead to increased positive emotions, satisfaction, and overall well-being in individuals.How does Haybron impact an individual's overall life satisfaction?

Haybron's work on happiness and well-being, as discussed in various contexts, significantly influences an individual's overall life satisfaction. He argues that in liberal societies with abundant choices, people often make decisions that lead to unhappiness due to "systematic imprudence". Haybron's theory links happiness to moods and the propensity to experience them, emphasizing the importance of emotional states in defining happiness. Furthermore, he distinguishes between happiness as a descriptive psychological state and well-being as a normative concept, contributing significantly to understanding overall well-being. By exploring the complexities of human emotions and decision-making, Haybron's work sheds light on how individuals can navigate choices and emotional states to enhance their life satisfaction.An RRL related to CICL during the period 2013-2023?

During the period 2013-2023, research on Children in Conflict with the Law (CICL) focused on exploring their concepts of hope and aspirations. Studies revealed that CICLs maintain hope by staying positive despite adversity, drawing strength from faith, and relying on a supportive social network. Additionally, their aspirations revolve around future career goals, seeking occupational fulfillment, and striving for personal reform and acceptance. Despite societal stigmatization, CICLs exhibit resilience and a desire to improve themselves, emphasizing their hopeful outlook on life and determination to become better individuals. This research sheds light on the inner world of CICLs, highlighting their positive outlook and aspirations for a brighter future amidst challenges.Is there any research on dispositional awe and belief change?

Research has explored the impact of dispositional awe on various psychological aspects. Studies have shown that dispositional awe is linked to decreased aggressive behavior, enhanced socially responsible consumption through personal meaning in life, and increased moral expansiveness by expanding moral consideration across different entities. Additionally, dispositional awe has been associated with promoting psychosocial flourishing among emerging adults through mechanisms of meaning in life and social connectedness. Furthermore, dispositional awe has been found to mediate prosocial tendencies through self-transcendent meaning in life and spiritual self-transcendence. While these studies provide valuable insights into the effects of dispositional awe on various psychological constructs, there is a gap in research specifically focusing on dispositional awe and belief change.What are the case studies of organizational neuroscience?

Organizational neuroscience, an emerging field that intersects neuroscience with organizational behavior, offers a rich tapestry of case studies and applications that illuminate its potential to transform workplace dynamics and management practices. One notable case study is Midas IT Co., where neuroscience principles are directly applied to human resource management, demonstrating the practical utility of the SCARF model (Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relationship, and Fairness) in enhancing trust, satisfaction, and performance among employees. This case exemplifies how understanding the brain can lead to more effective management philosophies and practices. Further illustrating the field's application, a success story in organizational change management showcases how neuroscientific insights can mitigate the brain's alarm response to change, emphasizing the importance of managers' awareness of their impact on team climate and outcomes. Additionally, the field of neuromarketing, bolstered by corporate investments, provides another case study where a company successfully navigated selling proposition changes by analyzing sales force resistance through neurometric techniques. The burgeoning domain of organizational neuroscience also extends to industrial adaptive behavior, where neuroscience constructs are applied to explore the dynamics between adaptability and stability in competitive environments. This analysis underscores the relevance of neuroscience in understanding complex business signaling and inference processes. Moreover, organizational neuroscience's potential is further highlighted in the context of training and development, job design, high-performance assessment, motivating communications, and conflict prevention. These practical implications suggest a future where neuroscience not only informs theoretical development but also enhances the efficacy of organizational practices. Collectively, these case studies and applications underscore the transformative potential of organizational neuroscience in addressing real-world organizational challenges, from human resource management to strategic change and competitive adaptability.What is the history of organizational neuroscience?

The history of organizational neuroscience (ON) traces its roots back to the early efforts of integrating neuroscience with management and organizational research, aiming to enhance our understanding of human behavior within organizational settings. Initially, the field emerged from the recognition that traditional organizational studies could benefit from the insights provided by neuroscience, particularly in understanding the neural underpinnings of behavior, decision-making, and interpersonal dynamics in the workplace. This interdisciplinary approach sought to leverage neuroscientific methods, such as brain imaging, to offer novel perspectives on organizational behavior. Early discussions in the field revolved around its potential to inform both academic research and practical applications in management and organizational settings. These discussions highlighted the challenges associated with collecting, integrating, interpreting, and utilizing brain-level analysis but also underscored the field's promise for theory development and practical implications. As technology advanced, making brain imaging more accessible and affordable, the application of neuroscience in organizational contexts became more feasible, further propelling the field's development. Organizational neuroscience has since expanded to include a variety of research areas, such as leadership, team dynamics, and emotional contagion, by adopting innovative approaches like the "second person" perspective. This approach emphasizes the importance of studying interpersonal interactions within organizations to gain deeper insights into organizational behavior. Moreover, the field has begun to explore the implications of neuroscience for understanding consumer behavior and marketing, thereby broadening its scope and application. Recent contributions have focused on applying neuroscience findings to address organizational challenges, such as adaptability and stability in competitive environments. This reflects a growing recognition of the value of neuroscientific insights in enhancing organizational performance and addressing complex business challenges. As organizational neuroscience continues to evolve, it holds the promise of offering more comprehensive and nuanced understandings of behavior in organizational contexts.What are the key developments in the field of organizational neuroscience?

The field of organizational neuroscience (ON) has seen significant developments, evolving into a flourishing scholarly domain that bridges neuroscience with management and organizational research. This interdisciplinary approach aims to inform and advance understanding in areas such as entrepreneurship, strategic management, and organizational behavior by leveraging neuroscientific methods and insights. A notable advancement is the incorporation of the "second person" approach, which emphasizes the importance of studying interpersonal dynamics within organizations through experimental settings involving two or more participants. This approach seeks to uncover the neural bases of organizational behavior by focusing on the dynamics within dyads or groups, such as leaders and followers or teams, thereby moving beyond individual-centric studies. The application of neuroimaging techniques has been identified as a crucial tool for theoretical innovation and knowledge reengineering in organizational behavior. These techniques offer a supplementary means to traditional measurement methods, playing a significant role in management model reform and theoretical progress. Furthermore, the integration of findings from neuroscience studies on adaptive behavior for ecological fitness into organizational behavior literature provides a new interpretive framework for exploring industrial adaptive behavior, highlighting the dynamics between adaptability and stability in competitive environments. Research in social neuroscience has also contributed to ON by identifying neurochemicals like oxytocin as key signals for trustworthiness within organizations. This has led to the development of neuromanagement models that aim to promote trust and prosocial behaviors within organizational cultures. Despite these advancements, the field faces methodological and analytical challenges, underscoring the need for careful and consistent critical evaluations of empirical works to ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of ON research. Looking ahead, the integration of psychological theories, such as Self-determination theory (SDT), with neuroscientific findings offers a promising direction for enhancing leadership approaches and understanding motivational factors behind leadership success. The ongoing exploration of the brain's complex functions and its implications for organizational behavior underscores the potential for future developments in ON. Collectively, these developments highlight the field's evolution and its potential to offer more comprehensive insights into organizational behavior and management practices.What are the developments of organizational neuroscience?

Organizational neuroscience (ON) has emerged as a novel scholarly domain, aiming to bridge neuroscience with management and organizational research, thereby flourishing as a self-standing scientific field with a focus on entrepreneurship, strategic management, and organizational behavior among others. The rapid development of information technology has significantly impacted this field, particularly through the application of neuroimaging techniques, which have been identified as crucial tools for theoretical innovation and knowledge reengineering in organizational behavior. The evolution of ON has been marked by debates around its value, particularly concerning the challenges in collecting and interpreting brain-level analysis data. However, there is a growing consensus on the importance of applying neuroscience to further theory development and provide comprehensive answers to research questions relevant to both academics and practitioners. Recent developments in ON include the adoption of experimental settings involving multiple participants to study the neural bases of organizational behavior, emphasizing the importance of interpersonal dynamics in the workplace. Additionally, neuroscience has been leveraged to enhance the success of implementing organizational change by understanding it as a cognitive process. The complexity of the human brain and the advancements in neuroscience research have enriched the understanding of brain functions, offering tangible benefits for organizational practices. Furthermore, ON has been applied to explore industrial adaptive behavior, highlighting the significance of business-to-business signaling in competitive environments. Despite the potential implications for leadership and organization development, there are ethical and public interest dilemmas associated with neuroimaging and physiology-based research methods. The interdisciplinary approach of ON, incorporating neuroscientific techniques, is poised for further growth, although it faces technological and methodological challenges that necessitate careful consideration. This roadmap for ON underscores the field's promise for advancing organizational research and practice while navigating its complexities and challenges.What is the philosophical view of organizational neuroscience?

The philosophical view of organizational neuroscience is multifaceted, reflecting a spectrum of opinions on its relevance and application to understanding human behavior and decision-making within organizations. At one end of the debate, there are strong advocates for the revolutionary potential of organizational neuroscience, suggesting that insights from brain research could fundamentally transform our understanding of key organizational processes and management practices. This enthusiasm is grounded in the belief that neuroscience can provide a deeper, more nuanced understanding of the neural underpinnings of leadership and decision-making, thereby enhancing leadership approaches and behavioral patterns. However, this optimistic view is counterbalanced by a critical perspective that questions the direct applicability of neuroscience to organizational studies. Critics argue that the complexity of human behavior and the social dynamics within organizations cannot be fully captured by neuroscientific methods alone. They caution against a reductionist approach that might overlook the importance of cognitive and social levels of analysis. This skepticism is rooted in philosophical and ethical concerns about the potential for neuroscience to oversimplify the rich tapestry of human experience and organizational life. Amid these polarized views, an intermediate, critical realist position emerges, advocating for a more integrated approach. This perspective acknowledges the value of neuroscience but insists on its combination with other disciplines to provide a holistic understanding of organizational behavior. It emphasizes the need for a theoretical framework that situates neural processes within the broader context of organizational cognitive activities, thereby avoiding reductionism and fostering a biologically informed yet socially situated understanding of organizational behavior. Furthermore, the philosophical discourse on organizational neuroscience also touches upon the implications of neuroscientific findings for ethics and self-conception. It suggests that while neuroscience can contribute significantly to ethics, its insights must be integrated with other disciplinary perspectives to enrich ethical deliberations and practices. This nuanced view underscores the importance of interdisciplinary dialogue in harnessing the potential of neuroscience to inform and enhance organizational studies.