What is better for the world globalization or nationalism?
Answers from top 15 papers
More filters
| Papers (15) | Insight |
|---|---|
31 Citations | One cannot argue--in the sense of being for or against globalization--with globalization as fact, although one can like it or dislike it. |
43 Citations | Taking issue with the generalised remit of economic nationalism in recent writings, it suggests that it consists of practices to create, bolster and protect national economies in the context of world markets. |
| On the one hand, there is nationalism embedded in patriotism with great pride in China's civilization, major achievements, and confidence in the country's future in embracing and meeting the challenges of globalization. | |
| type="main"> We argue that the “everyday nationalism” approach is both useful and necessary for improving existing constructivist approaches in the comparative study of nationalism and ethnic politics. | |
229 Citations | The evidence presented in Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics suggests that globalization is creating sharper, more urgent problems for states and international institutions to deal with. |
| However, my thesis points in another direction: globalization, in a socio-theoretical context, is tantamount to a revolution in the social sciences, forcing a change in perspective, a change of paradigms from the — as I would argue — predominant “methodological nationalism” to a “methodological cosmopolitanism” (Beck, 2006; Beck & Sznaider, 2006). | |
| What I will try to argue is something more specific: that cultural identity, properly understood, is much more the product of globalization than its victim. | |
| First, contrary to the argument by some political scientists that nationalism is compatible with, and indeed is the same as, democracy, the author argues that there is a significant degree of trade‐off between nationalism and democracy. | |
| Rather, globalization, regionalization, and nationalism should be captured and studied as forces relative to and overlapping one another, sometimes antagonistic and sometimes cooperative toward each other, but never harmonious. | |
| While nationalism is still a major reason for resistance, there are new forces brought about by international globalization that need to be considered. | |
| Together they illustrate why these states practice economic nationalism even as they enthusiastically embrace the generalized process of globalization through domestic reforms and liberalization. | |
| This thesis sharply tpposes the widespread conventional "wisdom" that nationalism stands in direct opposition to globalization. | |
40 Citations | Nationalism may be "superseded" by depoliticising the nation or by replacing national cultures with "imperial" cosmopolitanism(s). |
107 Citations | This paper argues, to the contrary, that nationalism is produced by central features of the modern world, including the ongoing process of globalisation. |
| This chapter sets the scene for this book’s argument that despite globalization being a process by which the people of the world are unified into a single society to function together, and the advantages thereof, the contours and the distribution of nationalism across the globe, and the identity interests associated with these contours, do undermine or operate against the aims of global governance, globalization, and the potential coherence of the global political and economic landscape. |
Related Questions
What is the history of nationalism?5 answersNationalism is a relatively modern concept that emerged in the 18th to 19th centuries with the rise of the nation-state. It became a dominant form of societal organization in modern times. The formation of modern national identity can be traced back to political origins and dynamics. There are three main classes of nationalism: liberal nationalism, conservative nationalism, and periphery nationalisms. The notion of "nation" evolved from a vague idea to an indispensable component of identity in a relatively short time. Nationalism played a role in the process of losing the legitimacy of traditional structures and the emergence of modern states. The nation-state differs from previous state structures with its nationalist nature, and nationalism is the dominant element in the structuring of the nation-state. American nationalism has its origins in the pioneer times of the Pilgrims and Founding Fathers, and it is influenced by religious, cultural, and historical circumstances.
How has globalization changed the role of the nation-state?4 answersGlobalization has significantly changed the role of the nation-state. The state's intervention in the economy has become crucial, especially during recession and crisis periods, but relatively weakened during the post-crisis period. Globalization has led to the emergence of a global economy and a global information system, institutionalized through global capital markets, trade, and production networks. This has resulted in the pluralization of power among political, economic, cultural, and social actors within and between states. The scope of state sovereignty has been reduced due to international agreements, global financial flows, activities of international organizations and multinational corporations, and issues concerning human rights. However, states also voluntarily give away some of their sovereign powers for certain reasons. The nation-state, particularly China, has played a role in promoting global sporting culture, demonstrating the duality of strategies and the emergence of reverse globalization. Overall, globalization has transformed the relationship between the state and the economy, making it crucial and beneficial for both sides.
What are the different ways in which globalization can lead to a decline in nationalism?5 answersGlobalization can lead to a decline in nationalism in several ways. First, globalization promotes the interchange of trade, knowledge, products, ideas, and people, which challenges nationalist ideologies that advocate economic and political autonomy and cultural authenticity. Second, the intensification of globalization has transformed the nature and functions of the nation-state, including its cultural identities, economic unity, and political sovereignty. Third, the impact of globalization on the nation-state is uneven and partial, rather than teleological in its advancement, suggesting that nationalism is being transformed but not superseded by contemporary developments. Finally, the growing prominence of economic globalization, immigration, refugees, and the assertion of Islamic identities can lead to a resurgence of conservative, authoritarian values and a struggle between authoritarian conservatism and liberalism, challenging the traditional divisions in mass politics.
Why is nationalism not relevant in some countries?5 answersNationalism is not relevant in some countries due to various reasons. One reason is that nationalism can be a destructive ideology and remains dubious as a moral doctrine. Additionally, the concept of nationalism has evolved over time, and what was considered nationalism in the past may not hold the same connotation in the present. Furthermore, in certain contexts, nationalism may not be the correct answer to address contemporary challenges, such as climate change. Moreover, the relevance of nationalism can vary between countries, as different historical trajectories and political contexts shape the significance of nationalism in each country. Therefore, the relevance of nationalism is not universal and can be influenced by historical, political, and contextual factors.
How can we define nationalism?5 answersNationalism can be defined as a set of beliefs about the nation, its origins, nature, and value. It considers humanity to be divided into distinct and unique nations, with membership in a nation taking precedence over other loyalties. Nationalism proposes a specific form of partiality, where one favors their own nation or group over others. It identifies the nation as the central form of community and elevates it to the object of supreme loyalty. Nationalism is a relatively modern concept that emerged with the nation-state in the 18th to 19th centuries. It is both a doctrine and a political movement that asserts the entitlement of a nation to a sovereign or autonomous political community based on shared history, culture, and destiny. Nationalism has had a significant impact on societal organization, with the nation-state becoming dominant.
Is nationalism good for you?4 answersNationalism can be seen as both a positive and negative force. It provides a sense of identity and belonging, emphasizing the importance of one's nation. Nationalism can also promote unity and inclusivity, as seen in past national projects like the New Deal. However, nationalism can also lead to divisions and conflicts, as evidenced by the destructive actions of certain nationalist leaders. It is important to recognize that nationalism takes different forms and can have both positive and negative manifestations. The concept of nationalism has the potential to be a positive cultural and political force, fostering loyalty and belief in one's country. Ultimately, whether nationalism is good for an individual depends on how it is practiced and its impact on society.