Search or ask a question

What is equipment design optimization on absorption based acid gas removal unit?

Mass transfer coefficient

Methyl diethanolamine

Hydrogen sulfide

Best insight from top research papers

Equipment design optimization for absorption-based acid gas removal units involves maximizing efficiency while minimizing energy consumption. Studies have utilized various techniques like Response Surface Methodology for calibration and prediction of interactions . Optimization aims to reduce energy penalties by determining optimal operating conditions, such as temperature and solvent composition, to enhance CO2 removal rates . For instance, using a blend of MDEA and MEA can significantly reduce energy requirements and costs, making the process more economically viable and environmentally friendly . By fine-tuning parameters like solvent concentration, flow rate, and temperature, the absorption capacity and mass transfer coefficient can be maximized, leading to improved overall performance of the acid gas removal unit .

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Optimization of Operational Parameter and Economic Analysis of Amine Based Acid Gas Capture Unit L.C. Law, Nurhazwani Yusoff Azudin, Syamsul Rizal Abd Shukor - Show less +2 more 20 Mar 2017-Chemical engineering transactions 3 Citations	Equipment design optimization for acid gas removal unit involves operating absorber at 30°C (1 atm) and stripper at 120°C (2 atm) with a specific MDEA to MEA ratio and amine concentration.
Journal Article•DOI Optimization and economic analysis of amine-based acid gas capture unit using monoethanolamine/methyl diethanolamine Li Chin Law, Nurhazwani Yusoff Azudin, Syamsul Rizal Abd Shukor - Show less +2 more 01 Apr 2018-Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 13 Citations	Equipment design optimization in acid gas removal units involves minimizing reboiler heat duty and maximizing CO2 removal efficiency. Optimal conditions include specific temperatures, pressure, and amine ratios for efficient operation.
Journal Article•DOI Optimization of carbon dioxide absorption in a continuous bubble column reactor using response surface methodology Ayse Gul, Masoud Derakhshandeh, Umran Tezcan Un - Show less +2 more 28 May 2023-Environmental Quality Management	Equipment design optimization for acid gas removal involves tuning factors like solvent concentration, flow rate, diffuser size, and temperature using Response Surface Methodology to enhance absorption capacity and mass transfer efficiency.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Simulation and Optimization of the Acid Gas Absorption Process by an Aqueous Diethanolamine Solution in a Natural Gas Sweetening Unit. Nasrin Salimi Darani, Reza Mosayebi Behbahani, Yasaman Shahebrahimi, Afshin Asadi, Amir H. Mohammadi - Show less +4 more 30 Apr 2021 3 Citations	Equipment design optimization for acid gas removal involves maximizing CO2 absorption using parameters like amine concentration, temperature, and circulation rate, as studied in the natural gas sweetening unit simulation.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Automated determination of optimal component design for a binary solvent for absorption-based acid gas removal 20 May 2023-Materials research proceedings	Automated regression models were developed using Aspen HYSYS data to optimize component design for amine solvents in acid gas removal units, enhancing efficiency and performance.

My columns

Related Questions

What is process optimization on absorption based acid gas removal unit?4 answersProcess optimization in absorption-based acid gas removal units involves maximizing efficiency while minimizing energy consumption and costs. Techniques like using amine solutions, such as diethanol amine (DEA) or blends like MDEA and MEA, are common for CO2 and H2S removal from natural gases. Studies have shown that optimizing operational parameters like temperature, amine concentration, and circulation rates can significantly impact CO2 removal efficiency. By utilizing simulation software like Aspen Plus, optimal conditions for the absorber and stripper can be determined, leading to increased CO2 removal rates and reduced energy penalties. This optimization not only enhances the environmental impact by reducing CO2 emissions but also makes the acid gas removal process more economically viable.

What type of reactors are uses in CO2 capture absorption?4 answersThe type of reactors used in CO2 capture absorption include bubble column gas absorption reactors with counter current flow, adsorbent reactors (spherical and cylindrical), and microstructured reactors (MSRs). The bubble column gas absorption reactor is used to investigate the absorption capacity and efficiency of different solvents. The adsorbent reactors are analyzed for their heat and mass transfer performance in CO2-based systems. The microstructured reactors with metal foams as packing materials are used to analyze the CO2 absorption performance of deep eutectic solvents (DESs). These different types of reactors are crucial for studying and improving the efficiency of CO2 capture and absorption processes.

What is the pH optimun for biogas production?5 answersThe optimal pH for biogas production varies depending on the specific conditions and waste materials being used. In one study, a pH of 7 was found to result in the highest biogas production, while a pH of 6.5 yielded the lowest biogas production. Another study found that a pH of 8.0 led to optimal methane production. Additionally, a pH of 10 was identified as the optimal pretreatment condition for biogas production from cassava wastewater. These findings suggest that the optimal pH for biogas production can range from slightly acidic to slightly alkaline, depending on the specific circumstances and waste materials being utilized.

What is the best method use to optimize gas lift?4 answersThe best method to optimize gas lift is through the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and IoT-based systems. These technologies allow for real-time monitoring and analysis of well performance, production rates, and pipeline network performance, enabling the identification of optimal gas lift rates. AI algorithms, such as deep reinforcement learning and chemical reaction optimization (CRO), can rapidly compute optimized setpoints in complex domains, leading to increased net profit and improved overall oil production rates. The CRO algorithm, inspired by molecular interactions, achieves the lowest possible state of free energy and provides a more efficient system for the petroleum production industry. Additionally, the combination of simulations, human expertise, and machine learning technologies helps build AI systems that excel in optimizing gas lift rates in real-time, even in complex fields with hundreds of wells.

Whats method using for optimize the gas lift4 answersThe gas lift optimization methods mentioned in the abstracts include the use of an IoT-based chemical reaction optimization (CRO) technique, a comprehensive method to determine the dewaxing interval period for gas-lift wells, the establishment of an optimum gas allocation model considering different types of gas-lift performance curves (GLPCs) and economic benefits as the objective, the combination of ESP and GL methods for energy saving and production optimization, and the use of gas-lift leakage drilling based on double-wall drill pipes.

What are advantages of gas lift method for elimination liquid loading?5 answersThe advantages of gas lift method for eliminating liquid loading include the ability to increase the production rate of gas wells by reducing the flowing bottom hole pressure and increasing the inflow of produced fluids. Gas lift is a versatile artificial lift method that closely resembles natural flow, making it a good choice for removing liquids from gas wells. It can be used for dewatering gas wells with low amounts of liquids, as it can compare well with other dewatering methods in terms of producing bottom hole pressure. Gas lift also allows for the injection of external gas into the produced flow stream, which can help remove wellbore fluids and improve the overall production of gas wells. Additionally, gas lift can lower the injection pressure by up to 75% when using a gas-liquid mixture, allowing for the transport of gas to deep injection points with considerably lower pressure.

See what other people are reading

What are the important factors of the mass transfer of fruits and vegetables?

Factors influencing the mass transfer of fruits and vegetables during processes like osmotic dehydration include the type and concentration of osmotic agents, processing temperatures, agitation or stirring methods, pretreatment techniques, and the application of edible coatings. Various non-thermal treatments can modify tissue structure, affecting mass transfer rates, such as the formation of pores in cell membranes through techniques like pulse electric fields, ultrasound, and osmosonication. Additionally, changes in experimental conditions can be described using mathematical models like Fick’s second law to understand the rate of mass transfer during osmotic dehydration. Understanding these factors is crucial for optimizing the mass transfer process and enhancing the quality of osmotically dehydrated products in food processing applications.How is biosensor sensitivity influenced by equilibrium dissociation constant?

The sensitivity of biosensors is significantly influenced by the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd). A lower Kd indicates higher binding affinity, leading to increased sensitivity in biosensors. Conversely, the dissociation constant impacts detection sensitivity in assays, with a systematic study showing that different Kd values (ranging from nanomolar to picomolar) affect the ability to detect molecular recognition events indicative of disease states. Additionally, the method for determining Kd by plotting resonance frequency shifts over time is particularly useful for studying protein-protein and protein-mRNA interactions, showcasing the importance of understanding dissociation constants in biosensor development. Furthermore, fluctuations in equilibrium adsorbed mass in biosensors are influenced by competitive adsorption, mass transfer processes, association, and dissociation rate constants, emphasizing the complex interplay between these factors and biosensor performance.What is the transfer function of a system with a first-order differential equation?

The transfer function of a system with a first-order differential equation can be described based on the properties of transfer functions and frequency responses of first-order systems, as discussed by Cohen Tenoudji. Additionally, the logarithm of the transfer function plays a crucial role in formulating the power spectral density function and spectral responses, aiding in understanding the system's behavior. Moreover, in the study of sampled-data systems, theorems have been extended to express limiting intrinsic zeros as exponential functions of continuous-time zeros, providing insights into the accuracy of asymptotic results for such systems. Therefore, the transfer function of a system with a first-order differential equation is influenced by these fundamental principles and mathematical models discussed in the referenced contexts.How do the properties of single-use bioreactor culture vessels affect the growth and yield of different types of microorganisms?

The properties of single-use bioreactor culture vessels significantly impact the growth and yield of various microorganisms. Single-use bioreactors offer advantages such as prevention of cross-contamination, making them suitable for cultures with spore-forming microorganisms. High turndown single-use bioreactors can expand the working range to include low fluid volumes, affecting mass transfer and cell growth, potentially simplifying operations and maintaining growth characteristics. Incorporating flexible baffles within single-use bioreactors enhances mixing, particularly low shear mixing, by disrupting vortex formation and ensuring homogeneous mixing throughout all operating volumes. The development of single-use bioreactors like the Wave 20 has revolutionized bioprocessing, making single-use technology increasingly standard for biotechnological product production in modern facilities. Computational fluid dynamics simulations combined with dynamic microfluidic single-cell cultivation provide insights into how fluctuating environmental conditions in large-scale bioreactors affect microbial physiology, growth, and production, aiding in process optimization and strain selection.What are the chemical reactions involved in degassing carbon dioxide from water during the purification process?

The chemical reactions involved in degassing carbon dioxide from water during the purification process include several steps. Firstly, in the lime-carbon dioxide method for nitrate water purification, carbon dioxide from quick lime and flue gas is used to remove Ca and Mg from the water. Secondly, in a degassing membrane device for purified water treatment, the removal of carbon dioxide helps reduce corrosion and conductivity issues in water by reducing the air content. Additionally, in the process for producing a purified gaseous product from a feedstream, carbon dioxide is removed by adsorption, followed by the oxidation of hydrogen to water vapor. These processes collectively contribute to the efficient removal of carbon dioxide from water during purification.What's the mechanisms involved in the production of chitosan and glycerophosphate hidrogels?

The production of chitosan and glycerophosphate hydrogels involves complex mechanisms. Chitosan gelation can be induced by ammonia intake from liquid or gaseous phases, with internal diffusion through the chitosan matrix being a key resistance factor in the gelation process. The type of glycerophosphate salt used significantly impacts the viscoelastic properties and phase transition conditions of the hydrogels, with calcium glycerophosphate leading to the fastest gelation and magnesium glycerophosphate delaying the process due to heat-induced dissolution of the salt. Additionally, the chemical structure of the polyol part in polyol-phosphate systems influences the macroscopic gelling behavior, affecting transition temperature, gelation time, and gel strength, with larger polyol parts hindering chitosan chain interactions and impacting the gelation process.How does mixing time affect the efficiency of single-use bioreactors in industrial processes?

Mixing time plays a crucial role in the efficiency of single-use bioreactors in industrial processes. Efficient mixing ensures uniform distribution of nutrients and gases, crucial for optimal microbial growth and productivity. Studies have shown that inadequate mixing can lead to exposure of cells to suboptimal conditions, impacting key performance parameters like yield and productivity. Research highlights the importance of accurately determining mixing times in bioreactors to minimize concentration gradients that can be detrimental to cell cultures. Additionally, investigations have demonstrated that mixing times in single-use bioreactors can be significantly influenced by factors such as impeller speeds, sparging rates, and working volumes, ultimately affecting the overall performance of the bioprocess. Therefore, optimizing mixing time is essential for maximizing the efficiency of single-use bioreactors in industrial applications.How does the mixing time affect the rate of mass transfer in disposable bioreactors?

The mixing time significantly influences the rate of mass transfer in disposable bioreactors. Studies have shown that the viscosity of the liquid phase impacts the mass transfer coefficient, with values ranging from 0.8 to 3.7 h⁻¹ at specific conditions. Additionally, the physical description of dispersion induced by bubbles in bioreactors is affected by liquid viscosity, impacting mixing times and bubble size. Detailed knowledge on macroscopic flow in stirred bioreactors under turbulent conditions can be obtained using flow-following sensor devices, which have been shown to quantify macromixing and circulation times effectively. These findings highlight the critical role of mixing time in influencing mass transfer rates within disposable bioreactors, emphasizing the importance of optimizing mixing conditions for enhanced bioprocess performance.Does the type of disposable bioreactor affect the relationship between mixing time and mass transfer?

The type of disposable bioreactor indeed influences the correlation between mixing time and mass transfer. Various studies have highlighted this relationship across different types of disposable bioreactors. Rocking disposable bioreactors operate with distinct oxygen transfer pathways, where surface aeration and breaking wave mechanisms significantly impact mass transfer efficiency. In contrast, rigid disposable stirred tank bioreactors exhibit similar engineering characteristics to traditional glass bioreactors, showcasing the importance of low agitation speeds and headspace aeration for mammalian cell cultures. Additionally, a novel mechanically driven Process Scouting Device demonstrated efficient mass transfer comparable to standard bioreactors, with adjustments in mixing time leading to improved mass transfer rates and oxygen levels for cell growth. These findings collectively emphasize the significant role of bioreactor design in shaping the interplay between mixing time and mass transfer efficiency.Effect of mixing time on gas transfer in disposable bioreactors?

Mixing time plays a crucial role in gas transfer efficiency in disposable bioreactors. Studies have shown that mixing time varies depending on factors such as recirculation, aeration rate, temperature, and the nature of the medium. Efficient mixing reduces the time required for gas-liquid interactions, enhancing mass transfer coefficients and overall performance of the bioreactor. Different flow regimes, such as homogeneous fine-bubble or heterogeneous regimes, are achieved at specific aeration rates, impacting gas retention and transfer efficiency. Additionally, the geometry of the bioreactor, including impeller design and sparger configuration, significantly influences mixing characteristics and gas distribution. Understanding and optimizing mixing times are essential for maximizing gas transfer efficiency in disposable bioreactors, ultimately improving bioprocess outcomes.What is the impact of temperature in wormhole generation using carbonated brine (i.e., CO2-saturated brine)?

Temperature plays a significant role in wormhole generation during the injection of carbonated brine. Research indicates that at higher temperatures, such as 300°F, narrower wormholes are formed when using retarded acids compared to emulsified acids, which lead to wider wormholes at 200°F. Additionally, the impact of temperature on wormhole generation is evident in carbonate matrix acidizing, where lower temperature dolomite formations exhibit reaction rate limitations, resulting in shorter wormholes compared to limestone formations at higher temperatures. Furthermore, the diffusion coefficient of HCl acid, crucial for wormholing processes, decreases at higher pressures and temperatures due to CO2 impact, affecting the speed and profile of wormholes. Therefore, temperature plays a crucial role in influencing wormhole characteristics during carbonated brine injection processes.