What is reflexivity according to Bourdieu?
Best insight from top research papers
Reflexivity according to Bourdieu involves a methodological process that goes beyond the researcher's social background and interpersonal relations with the researched, focusing on the conditions of knowledge production, intellectual bias, and positioning. Bourdieu emphasizes self-reflexivity as a powerful tool against the "scholastic point of view" prevalent in academia, advocating for a research approach that considers the scholar's relation to the social space and scholarly field, aiming to understand the practical logic governing various social fields. This concept of reflexivity is grounded in Bourdieu's work and operates on multiple epistemological and methodological levels simultaneously, facilitating a collective and non-violent scientific practice through a theory of practice. Additionally, reflexivity involves questioning assumptions, meanings, and power relations to unsettle established realities and generate alternative perspectives, with self-reflexivity prompting researchers to interrogate their role in knowledge production through reflexive texts and practices.
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Reflexivity, according to Bourdieu, involves questioning assumptions and power dynamics to challenge established realities and generate alternative perspectives through reflexive practices and self-interrogation in research. | |
08 Aug 2022 | Reflexivity, as per Bourdieu, is a methodological tool crucial for countering the academe's scholastic viewpoint by considering the scholar's relation to social space, scholarly field, and general conditions. |
| Reflexivity, per Bourdieu, involves researchers being aware of their biases to enhance trustworthiness in research by scrutinizing their own cultural practices, biases, and intellectual positioning. | |
| Reflexivity, as per Bourdieu, involves surpassing subject/object dualism by intertwining scientific and practical knowledge, fostering a collective and non-violent scientific practice through a relational approach. |
Related Questions
What are the criticisms of "science of science and reflexivity" book by bourdieu simon susen?5 answersCritics of Bourdieu's "Science of Science and Reflexivity" book highlight limitations in explaining scientific practices in non-central countries, globalization effects on science, and the self-reforming capacity of scientific reflexivity. Additionally, critiques point out that Bourdieu's reflexive sociology may not lead to sociologists gaining symbolic power, despite aiding in field autonomy. Furthermore, the concept of reflexivity, as proposed by Bourdieu, emphasizes the importance of a careful approach to social practices like opinion polls, suggesting that a reflexive attitude can enhance objectivity in research. Bourdieu's work underscores the need for a critical evaluation of scientific fields and practices, acknowledging the complexities and challenges in achieving true reflexivity and objectivity in social research.
What are the criticisms of "science of science and reflexivity" book by bourdieu?5 answersCritics argue that Bourdieu's "Science of Science and Reflexivity" lacks pedagogical clarity, hindering the transfer of intended propositions and impeding comparative sociology advancements. Bourdieu emphasized thorough reflexivity in social science research, contrasting it with the concealment of research processes in the final outcomes. Additionally, the concept of reflexivity in social theory is critiqued for overemphasizing agency solely through reflexivity, neglecting enduring aspects like routinization of social life and the taken-for-granted, as highlighted by Margaret Archer. Despite the value of reflexivity in constructing critical epistemologies, it raises significant questions regarding evaluation and methodology. Bourdieu's suggestion of using a reflexive attitude in social practices, particularly in research, to enhance objectivity is noted, although the exact implementation remains ambiguous.
What is reflexive methodology?5 answersReflexive methodology involves critically examining one's assumptions, beliefs, and judgments to understand how they influence the research process. It is central in debates on objectivity and subjectivity in social science research, particularly distinguishing qualitative and quantitative methodologies. While qualitative research emphasizes personal experiences and encourages researchers to consider their own positionalities, reflexive methodology can also enhance mixed-methods studies by integrating quantitative and qualitative elements for a more in-depth inquiry and transparent research process. Additionally, reflexive methodology can be applied to de-westernize knowledge production in specific fields, such as Organizational Communication research in Latin America, by considering contextual and cultural realities. Furthermore, incorporating a model of reflexivity in field research strengthens the rigor of the research process and the researcher's development.
How can reflexivity be used to improve the quality of qualitative research?5 answersReflexivity is a crucial concept in qualitative research that can improve the quality of the research. It involves examining one's own assumptions, beliefs, and judgments and critically reflecting on how these influence the research process. Reflexivity can be practiced in various ways, such as thinking about one's own thinking, observing emotions/thoughts and power dynamics in research relationships, and exploring perceptual experiences. It is important to go beyond a focus on the power of the researcher and consider the co-constructed dynamics and power struggles between researchers and participants. Reflexivity criteria can be operationalized through self-reflection questions that engage researchers in understanding the purpose, participants, and impacts of their research. Incorporating reflexivity in qualitative research allows researchers to acknowledge their own positionalities, engage thoughtfully with every step of the research process, and contribute to openness and transparency in the field.
Why is reflexivity needed in social science research?5 answersReflexivity is needed in social science research because it allows researchers to critically examine their own assumptions, beliefs, and judgments, and consider how these influence the research process. It helps researchers to become aware of their own positionalities and how these shape their research, contributing to debates on objectivity and subjectivity in research. Reflexivity is particularly important in qualitative research, where researchers are encouraged to consider their own perspectives and biases and how these may impact the research findings. It also helps to uncover hidden assumptions, meanings, and power relations that underpin certain understandings of reality, allowing for alternative ways of thinking. Additionally, reflexivity promotes transparency and allows researchers to address potential biases and interpretations that may not be rooted in the data. It also enables interdisciplinary teams to engage in collective reflexivity, fostering creative and innovative approaches and developing a shared vision of research concepts, methods, and outcomes.
Reflexivity of the researcher?5 answersReflexivity of the researcher is a crucial aspect in qualitative research, particularly in understanding the researcher's positionality and its impact on the research process. It involves acknowledging the researcher's social identities and experiences, and how these influence the research outcomes. Reflexivity is not limited to methodological approach but should be integrated into epistemological considerations throughout the research process, enhancing critical examination of assumptions and providing access to a multilevel analysis of language use in the workplace. Additionally, reflexive processes enable novice nurse researchers to develop self-awareness, navigate their dual identities, and overcome tensions as they transition into research roles. This self-awareness and critical reflection are essential for researchers to produce rigorous and transparent qualitative studies, particularly when the researcher shares social identities and experiences with the research informants.