scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

What is systematic review? 


Best insight from top research papers

A systematic review is a comprehensive synthesis of existing research on a specific topic, considered the highest level of evidence in evidence-based practice. It involves a meticulous search and critical appraisal of all available literature to answer a research question. Systematic reviews are crucial in guiding clinical decision-making by providing a reliable summary of evidence for healthcare professionals. They help reduce bias by following a predefined search strategy and rigorous methodology, distinguishing them from narrative reviews. Systematic reviews often lead to meta-analyses, where statistical analysis combines results from multiple studies selected in the systematic review. Despite their systematic approach, systematic reviews may still be susceptible to biases like inclusion of poor-quality studies or reporting biases, emphasizing the importance of careful consideration when interpreting their conclusions.

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
A systematic review is a critical analysis of published studies on human subjects, essential for evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, and health policy decisions.
Systematic review is a method of synthesizing research findings on a specific topic, aiding evidence-based practice in nursing by systematically analyzing relevant literature to inform decision-making.
Journal ArticleDOI
172 Citations
A systematic review is a meticulous summary of all available primary research on a specific topic, considered the most reliable evidence source for guiding clinical practice and guideline development.
Systematic review is a method that combines evidence through rigorous literature search and critical appraisal, aiding clinical decision-making but susceptible to biases like poor study quality and heterogeneity.
A systematic review is a rigorous study that synthesizes existing research on a specific topic, providing the highest level of evidence by following a predefined search strategy to minimize bias.

Related Questions

What is a systematic review in management?5 answersA systematic review in management is a comprehensive summary of prior research on a specific topic, conducted using explicit and systematic processes to identify, select, and critically assess relevant studies. It aims to provide a thorough overview of the literature related to a research issue, synthesizing earlier work to enhance understanding of the topic while reducing bias. Systematic reviews play a crucial role in management research by helping researchers identify gaps, correct shortcomings, and guide future studies. They are essential for exploring strategies implemented by universities to achieve their goals, highlighting the importance of studying strategic management methods in higher education institutions. Additionally, systematic reviews impact decision-making in various fields, including health, by summarizing data from different studies to inform professionals.
How to do systematic review?4 answersSystematic reviews involve several key steps. First, researchers need to formulate a research question and develop a study protocol that outlines the objectives, eligibility criteria, and methods for identifying and selecting studies. Next, a comprehensive search for relevant literature is conducted. After identifying eligible studies, researchers assess the quality and risk of bias in each study. Data from the included studies are then collected and synthesized, either qualitatively or quantitatively through meta-analysis. The results are often presented in standardized formats, such as forest plots with confidence intervals. Finally, the certainty of evidence is graded, and conclusions are drawn based on the findings. It is important for systematic reviews to follow rigorous and transparent methods to ensure credibility and reproducibility.
What is a systematic review?5 answersA systematic review is a rigorous and meticulous summary of all available primary research on a specific topic. It is considered the most reliable source of evidence for guiding clinical practice. Systematic reviews aim to consolidate existing knowledge, identify unresolved problems, and provide a deeper insight into a specific phenomenon. They are conducted following a predefined search strategy to minimize bias and appraise all available published literature. Systematic reviews provide an objective answer to a defined question and contribute to evidence-based decision-making. By adhering to a prospectively defined protocol, systematic reviews reduce bias and provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence. They are increasingly common in published research and are important for infection control professionals and hospital epidemiologists in determining changes in clinical practice.
What is systematic review of literature?5 answersA systematic literature review is a method used to provide a clear and objective summary of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic. It involves analyzing, synthesizing, and summarizing bodies of related literature to identify gaps in the literature and suggest areas for future research. This type of review is widely used in various fields, including healthcare, education, psychology, and social sciences, to inform evidence-based decision-making, policy development, and practice guidelines. The process of conducting a systematic literature review requires careful planning, attention to detail, and a systematic approach to data collection and analysis. By undertaking a systematic literature review, researchers can test hypotheses, develop new theories, and gain insights to advance knowledge in their field. It is an important step for novice researchers and can enhance management research by providing a comprehensive overview of relevant literature and correcting its shortcomings.
What is the definition of systematic review?4 answersA systematic review is a method of research that involves searching, selecting, appraising, and summarizing all relevant studies on a specific healthcare question. It follows a structured methodology and aims to provide reliable findings by minimizing bias. Systematic reviews are valuable in evidence-based decision-making and can assist in keeping up to date with the exponential growth of available evidence. They are characterized by their rigorous approach, including the formulation of a research question, comprehensive literature search, critical appraisal of included studies, synthesis of results (often using statistical methods), and estimation of the certainty of evidence for each outcome. Systematic reviews contribute to the current understanding of complex issues, inform clinical practice and policy, and impact medical practices and policies.
What is a systematic review?2 answersA systematic review is a rigorous and reproducible process that summarizes all available primary research on a specific topic. It is considered the most reliable source of evidence for guiding clinical practice. Systematic reviews aim to consolidate existing knowledge, identify unresolved problems, and provide a deeper insight into a specific phenomenon. They follow a predefined search strategy to identify and appraise all relevant published literature, distinguishing them from narrative reviews. Systematic reviews minimize bias and error by sifting through the medical literature objectively and transparently. They provide clinicians with an objective answer to a defined question, contributing to evidence-based decision-making. Systematic reviews are useful for supporting clinical decision-making, reducing the time needed to find appropriate evidence, but they are not completely bias-resistant.

See what other people are reading

How get unbiased samples for quantitative research?
5 answers
To obtain unbiased samples for quantitative research, it is crucial to employ proper sampling techniques. Randomly selecting the initial sample is essential, followed by ensuring that the final sample is not self-selected or biased. Understanding the importance of sample representation, avoiding bias, and considering factors like random and systematic errors are key aspects in sampling for research. It is vital to describe the sampling method thoroughly in research articles to enable critical review, prevent systematic bias, and enhance generalizability of findings. Employing techniques like adaptive sampling with bias potentials can accelerate exploration of phase space in atomistic modeling, but efficient unbiasing methods are necessary to recover unbiased distributions. By adhering to these principles and techniques, researchers can enhance the quality and reliability of their quantitative research studies.
How can being overburdened by working while studying effect ones suicidal behaviour?
5 answers
Being overburdened by working while studying can significantly impact one's suicidal behavior. Factors such as repeated frustrations in academic and career pursuits, social isolation, and negative emotions like depression can contribute to increased suicidal ideation and behavior. Workplace-related stress, especially in certain sectors like health, construction, and agriculture, has been linked to higher suicide risk, with lower-skilled workers facing a greater risk. Additionally, the lack of work-life balance and the rising suicide deaths among American workers highlight the critical need to study the interplay between work and suicide to reduce mortality. Therefore, the combination of academic pressure, work-related stress, and lack of coping mechanisms can exacerbate suicidal tendencies, emphasizing the importance of addressing these issues to prevent tragic outcomes.
What are perception gaps?
5 answers
Perception gaps refer to differences in how stakeholders perceive certain aspects, such as the importance of key performance indicators (KPIs) in supply chain relationships. These gaps can impact performance and are crucial to address for improved outcomes. In the context of healthcare, there are perception gaps between patients and practitioners regarding treatment efficacy, often due to communication issues. Additionally, perception gaps are evident in how the general public and radiation experts view risks associated with nuclear power and other sources of radioactivity, highlighting the influence of trust and personal benefits on risk perception. Understanding and bridging these perception gaps is essential for informed decision-making and effective risk communication in various domains.
Do Law and Regulation be the barriers to the adoption of sustainable packaging design?
4 answers
The adoption of sustainable packaging design is influenced by a myriad of factors, including law and regulation. While laws and regulations are often perceived as potential barriers to the implementation of sustainable packaging practices, they can also serve as drivers, depending on their framing and application. On one hand, regulatory pressures are identified as key drivers for sustainable packaging, pushing companies towards adopting eco-friendly practices to comply with governmental mandates aimed at reducing environmental impact. This suggests that, rather than acting solely as barriers, laws and regulations can catalyze positive change within the industry by setting standards that encourage the adoption of sustainable practices. However, the complexity and cost implications associated with meeting these regulatory requirements can pose significant challenges. The literature highlights cost/benefit ambiguity and additional costs as main barriers to sustainable packaging, with these barriers being contingent on firm size. Smaller firms, in particular, may find it more challenging to absorb the costs associated with compliance, making regulations a more significant barrier for them. Moreover, the sustainable packaging landscape is marked by gaps between tool providers and users, exacerbated by the increasing cost of processing packaging waste directed at firms through stricter regulations. This gap indicates a disconnect that can hinder the effective implementation of sustainable packaging solutions, suggesting that while regulations aim to drive sustainability, they can also create challenges in practice. Furthermore, the literature points to customer resistance to design changes as a significant hindrance to adopting sustainable packaging practices. This resistance, coupled with the regulatory landscape, underscores the complex trade-offs companies must navigate between packaging requirements, consumer expectations, and compliance with laws and regulations. In conclusion, while laws and regulations are designed to foster sustainability in packaging, their implementation can present both opportunities and obstacles. The effectiveness of these regulations in promoting sustainable packaging design depends on their ability to balance the drive for environmental protection with the practical challenges faced by companies, particularly in terms of cost and consumer acceptance.
How to make Research design?
5 answers
Research design involves a structured framework of methods and techniques chosen by researchers to collect information necessary to address a research question. It encompasses decisions on data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Key considerations in designing research include the nature of the research question, levels of analysis, epistemological assumptions, characteristics of data sources, and practicalities. A successful research design should aim for accuracy, neutrality, reliability, validity, and the ability to generalize findings. It is crucial to consider various factors and influences that shape the research design decisions to ensure the study's integrity and effectiveness. Additionally, flexibility in adapting the research design to emerging constraints and opportunities during the research process is essential for its success.
What are some examples of tools included in a methodology?
4 answers
Various tools are included in methodologies across different fields. For instance, in the context of research methodology, tools like artificial neural networks such as multilayer perceptron (MLP) and three-layer feedforward neural network RBF are utilized for data analysis. In the realm of educational support, tools like the BE(A)ST approach with 21 tools and techniques are employed to assist students in career choices. Additionally, methodological assessment tools play a crucial role in evaluating the quality of studies, with examples like the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies. Furthermore, in the domain of military operations research, mathematical models and tools are essential for analyzing combat potential and forces correlation. These examples showcase the diverse range of tools integrated into methodologies across various disciplines.
Which simulation exercise is more effective? announced and unannounced simulation?
5 answers
High-fidelity simulation exercises have shown to be more effective than paper-based exercises in medical education, as indicated by feedback from students and teachers. Additionally, simulation has proven effective in acquiring knowledge and skills for smoking cessation, regardless of the method used, such as standardized patient, role play, or video projection with discussion. When comparing announced and unannounced simulation exercises, the literature does not explicitly address this specific comparison. However, the use of simulation in various contexts highlights its overall effectiveness in skill acquisition and knowledge retention, suggesting that both announced and unannounced simulation exercises can be beneficial in different ways, depending on the learning objectives and outcomes desired.
What is the common sex for driving without license?
5 answers
Most individuals aged 65 and older who do not drive are women, with older women constituting the majority of nondrivers due to various reasons such as limited incomes and household support for addressing their travel needs. Additionally, research on the impact of aging and driving cessation due to conditions like dementia highlights the challenges faced by both male and female drivers, with specific focus on predicting driving suitability for patients with Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia. Furthermore, studies on the decision-making process of older drivers voluntarily giving up their licenses due to aging-related issues emphasize the psychological impact on individuals and the need for reconstructing their sense of self and social relationships post-driving cessation.
Can the implementation of predictive fatigue models improve overall safety and well-being of workers in the mining industry?
4 answers
The implementation of predictive fatigue models can indeed enhance the safety and well-being of workers in the mining industry. By predicting factors like muscle fatigue, mental fatigue, and cognitive fatigue, these models can help in identifying potential risks and preventing accidents. Additionally, interventions such as bright-light treatments and sleep hygiene management have shown promise in improving alertness and reducing fatigue among shiftworkers. Incorporating Artificial Intelligence (AI) and eXplainable AI (XAI) for detecting physical fatigue during manual handling tasks can further enhance safety by providing explainable and trustworthy insights. Therefore, leveraging predictive fatigue models can significantly contribute to mitigating risks, enhancing worker well-being, and promoting a safer working environment in the mining industry.
What are the most effective strategies for reducing medication errors and adverse reactions in healthcare settings?
5 answers
Effective strategies for reducing medication errors and adverse reactions in healthcare settings include medication reconciliation, computerized physician order entry/clinical decision support systems, barcoding for correct medication administration, feedback on prescribing errors, and improved medication dispensing systems in surgical wards. These interventions have shown promising results in reducing medication errors and adverse drug events in hospital settings. For instance, medication reconciliation has been associated with a reduction in medication errors and adverse drug events, while computerized physician order entry systems have shown to decrease medication errors compared to paper-based systems. Additionally, barcoding has demonstrated a potential reduction in medication errors, and feedback on prescribing errors has been linked to a decrease in medication errors as well. Implementing these strategies can significantly enhance medication safety and patient outcomes in healthcare facilities.
What is the prevalence of type 2 diabetes worldwide?
5 answers
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes worldwide is a significant health concern. Estimates indicate that in 2017, around 462 million individuals were affected by type 2 diabetes, corresponding to 6.28% of the world's population. By 2019, the global age-standardized point prevalence of type 2 diabetes had increased to 5282.9 per 100,000 population, marking a 49% rise since 1990. Furthermore, the burden of suffering from diabetes mellitus is rising globally, with over 1 million deaths annually attributed to diabetes alone. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is projected to continue increasing, with forecasts indicating a rise to 7079 individuals per 100,000 by 2030. Urgent public health measures are necessary, especially in lower-income countries, to address this escalating prevalence and its associated health risks.