Search or ask a question

What is the impact of Chantal Mouffe's work on contemporary political discourse?

Pluralism (philosophy)

Political philosophy

Articulation (sociology)

Best insight from top research papers

Chantal Mouffe's work has significantly influenced contemporary political discourse by challenging traditional notions of rationality and depoliticization. Mouffe, along with Laclau, emphasizes the construction of hegemony through antagonisms and the formation of agonistic spaces . They critique the depoliticization of power relations and advocate for a more inclusive and pluralistic political arena . Mouffe's political theory, while considered postfoundational, differs from others by implying a conservative disposition that acknowledges the necessity of police power for social order . Furthermore, Mouffe's discourse analysis approach, developed with Laclau, provides a framework for understanding and analyzing various socio-political discourses, offering insights into how hegemonic discourses are articulated and contested in different contexts . Mouffe's work thus challenges existing norms and contributes to shaping contemporary political debates.

Answers from top 4 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (4)	Insight
Open access•Journal Article•DOI On the limits of the political: The problem of overly permissive pluralism in Mouffe's agonism Ugur Aytac 01 Sep 2021-Constellations 14 Citations	Chantal Mouffe's work challenges depoliticization, emphasizing power dynamics in defining political boundaries, yet faces criticism for potentially permitting problematic politicization instances like science denialism in public debates.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Chantal Mouffe Ve Jurgen Habermas’ın Demokrasi Yaklaşımları İsmail Hakkı Elçi 27 Aug 2022-The journal of social science	Chantal Mouffe's work impacts contemporary political discourse by introducing the concept of agonism, emphasizing the role of conflict transformation in enhancing democracy, contrasting with Habermas' consensus-focused approach.
Open access•DOI Discourse analysis in the perspective of ernesto laclau and chantal mouffe St Tri Guntur Narwaya 02 Jan 2021 2 Citations	Chantal Mouffe's work impacts contemporary political discourse by offering a Neo-Marxist and Post-structuralist perspective, rejecting essentialism, and analyzing power dynamics through discourse analysis methods.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Depoliticization of politics and power: Mouffe and the conservative disposition in postfoundational political theory Tuukka Brunila 10 Nov 2022-Frontiers in political science	Chantal Mouffe's work implies a conservative political disposition by suggesting the necessity of police power for social order, impacting contemporary political discourse with this perspective.

My columns

Related Questions

How does discourse affect dialogical engagement in political science?4 answersDiscourse in political science significantly influences dialogical engagement by structuring understanding, behavior, and power dynamics. It serves as a system of constraints and permissions, impacting what is said, who can speak, and how speech is conducted. Political Discourse Analysis integrates various conceptual elements to deepen the comprehension of power dynamics and community life. Narratives of dialogue in political discourse construct images of speakers engaging in conversations, shaping the ethos of parliamentarians as receptive to interlocutors. Discourse, as a real-life communication process, considers linguistic qualities, spontaneity, thematic coherence, and the social positions of communicants, reflecting specific circumstances and intentions of the author. Overall, discourse plays a pivotal role in shaping dialogical interactions within the realm of political science.

How can stylistic analysis be used to analyze political discourse?4 answersStylistic analysis can be used to analyze political discourse by examining the linguistic features and devices used in political speeches and texts. It involves analyzing the choice of words, grammatical structures, metaphors, repetition, and other stylistic devices employed by politicians to convey their messages and influence the audience. Stylistic analysis helps to uncover the rhetorical strategies and persuasive techniques used in political discourse, as well as the underlying ideologies and power dynamics. It allows researchers to explore how stylistic devices create a rhetorical effect and contribute to the overall persuasive nature of political communication. By studying the linguistic patterns and discourse strategies, stylistic analysis can reveal the discursive practices of hegemony and persuasion in political discourse. Additionally, stylistic analysis can provide insights into the socio-political cognition embedded in political speeches and texts, shedding light on the mental models and ideologies that shape political communication.

What are the effects of political memes on political discourse?5 answersPolitical memes have various effects on political discourse. They can serve as a means of humorous engagement in online political discussions, facilitating the communication of political beliefs and attitudes. Exposure to political memes can increase polarization, especially among strong party identifiers. Political memes can also influence political opinions, form a common identity, and build discourse around leaders. Users employ different referring strategies in political memes, including direct and indirect quotes, citations, and allusions, which enhance the visibility and saliency of the memes. Additionally, memes reappropriating political discourse can be used in non-political contexts, leading to the depoliticization of propaganda discourse. However, it is important to note that some political memes can have negative impacts, such as exploiting personal life, manipulating social ideologies, and humiliating others.

What are the effects of social media on political discourse?4 answersSocial media has had significant effects on political discourse. It has provided people with easier and faster accessibility to information and has become an outlet for them to share their views on socio-political issues. The use of social media by different groups of people has changed their identity recognition and linguistic behavior, leading to a division in social perspectives on politics, culture, and public policies. The Internet and social media have also been found to affect political outcomes, although the specific mechanisms are still being studied. However, there are concerns about the dominance of negative and hate comments on social networks used for political communication, with platforms like Facebook and Whatsapp being particularly prone to abuses and hate comments. Additionally, while social media platforms have been seen as potential public spaces for political discussions, some users experience political discussion regret and find these discussions to be sterile. Overall, social media has both positive and negative effects on political discourse, and further research is needed to fully understand its impact.

How does Twitter affect people's view on political discourse?3 answersTwitter has had a significant impact on political discourse. It has become a preferred platform for politicians to communicate with the public. This online presence has allowed citizens to have immediate access to their elected representatives. However, it has also led to concerns about online hate towards politicians. Hate speech against politicians on Twitter has been identified and analyzed, revealing patterns of intense hate during high-volume events or situations. Certain topics and demographics, such as ethnic minority background and government positions, receive more hate than others. Additionally, political actors actively employ strategies to polarize political discourse on Twitter, including the use of hashtags to promote their own agenda. Overall, Twitter has influenced people's views on political discourse by providing a platform for communication, exposing hate speech, and facilitating polarization.

What are the effects of political discourse on the public?5 answersPolitical discourse can have both positive and negative effects on the public. On one hand, political discussion and deliberation are crucial to democracy and can lead to citizen engagement and interest in politics. However, political discussions that involve disagreements can actually result in political disengagement or lack of interest, especially among less informed citizens, strongly partisan individuals, or those who have strong social ties with those they disagree with. Additionally, the language used in political discourse can also impact the public's view of politics. Conciliatory political language generally strengthens positive opinions about politics, while confrontational language can lead to negative perceptions. It is important to professionalize public discourse and adhere to professional standards in communication and public relations to ensure authentic and effective communication with the public.

See what other people are reading

What are some effective techniques for implementing and monitoring a strategic plan?

Effective techniques for implementing and monitoring a strategic plan include utilizing tools like the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) to align operational objectives with key measures. Additionally, it is crucial to adopt adaptive management approaches and strategic adaptive management formats to ensure successful implementation and monitoring of strategic plans. Furthermore, analyzing deficiencies, studying best practices, and applying monitoring and evaluation (M&E) strategies to policy documents can enhance the planning process for future periods. Implementing specific indicators and determinants, recognizing the importance of M&E, and correcting policy documents based on evaluation results are essential steps to achieve the strategic goals of development in local communities. Lastly, developing methodologies to remove obstacles and implementing adequate strategic control mechanisms can improve the effectiveness of strategy implementation and monitoring in organizations.What is the stewardship theory?

Stewardship theory, as proposed in various contexts, challenges individuals to view nature as sacred and emphasizes responsible care and preservation of the environment. It contrasts with neoclassical economic theory by rejecting the subjective theory of value based on individual preferences and instead advocates for an objective theory of value rooted in the stewardship of God's creation. In the realm of public governance, stewardship theory offers an alternative to agency theory, focusing on trust-based management to motivate public employees and enhance organizational performance. Additionally, in family firm governance studies, stewardship theory is a prominent framework that emphasizes the alignment of interests between owners and managers for the long-term success of the business.Why is research useful for future researchers?

Research is crucial for future researchers as it serves as a continuous knowledge hunt, enabling the development of new trends, processes, products, and activities that enhance human life. By integrating futures research approaches, such as bibliometrics, text-mining tools, and serious gaming, researchers can navigate the complex technological landscape and anticipate future developments effectively. Additionally, research contributes to theoretical advancements by integrating structural and perceptual aspects of identity theory and understanding various sources of identity discrepancies, which influence behavior and control meanings, ultimately shaping future research directions. Moreover, research activities in higher education institutions play a vital role in training proactive and creative future teachers, fostering self-reflection, critical thinking, and a constructive attitude towards professional growth and improvement. Anticipatory anthropology further emphasizes the importance of research in exploring cultural futures, understanding the impacts of emerging technologies, and addressing global social challenges, which are essential for future scholars and practitioners.Why is research important for future researchers?

Research is crucial for future researchers as it drives the generation of new knowledge, trends, processes, products, and activities that enhance human life. However, challenges such as financial constraints, limited opportunities, and inadequate exposure hinder students from pursuing research tracks, especially in medical schools. Future teachers benefit significantly from engaging in research activities, as it cultivates critical thinking, self-evaluation, and professional problem-solving skills, leading to self-realization and success in their field. Moreover, incorporating futures research methodologies can aid in predicting and adapting to emerging technologies, enhancing verification techniques for Weapons of Mass Destruction compliance. Overall, research is essential for future researchers to expand their understanding of various identities, behaviors, and social realities, paving the way for theoretical and substantive advancements in diverse fields.What Alex M. Nading noticed about Living in a Toxic World?

Alex M. Nading observed that the proliferation of industrial toxic substances has led to significant environmental and bodily impacts. However, conventional methods of measuring and addressing these effects have limitations. Toxicity is not only a health concern but also affects human relations with time, shaping contemporary life. The presence of toxic substances in the environment for extended periods, the long-lasting effects on the human body, and the delayed visibility of exposure effects create a state of perpetual uncertainty, highlighting the temporal aspects of toxicity. Nading's insights align with the idea that living in a toxic world involves not just physical health risks but also temporal disorientation, instability, and a sense of impasse, which can be considered forms of toxic harm in their own right.What will the future researcher get in a research?

Future researchers engaging in various fields of study can expect to encounter a multitude of opportunities and challenges. They may delve into theoretical advancements such as integrating structural and perceptual aspects of identity theory, understanding sources of identity discrepancies, and exploring different levels of social reality. Additionally, researchers may face open problems in elasticity and thermoelasticity theories for quadruple porosity materials, and explore multiscale geometry in continuum theories of mixtures and biologically structured membranes, focusing on mathematical measures of deformation and notions of curvature at different scales. Furthermore, urban evacuation modeling based on dynamic network flow models presents a practical application involving flow constraints, traffic routing, and network capacities dependent on lane assignments. Overall, future researchers can anticipate a diverse landscape of theoretical, practical, and interdisciplinary challenges in their research endeavors.How is dignity relevant to clinical trials consent?

Dignity plays a crucial role in the context of clinical trials consent by emphasizing respect for autonomy, agency, and human rights. Informed consent processes in clinical trials are essential to uphold participants' dignity, ensuring they understand the risks, benefits, and purpose of the study. Challenges such as therapeutic misconception, where participants confuse research with personalized care, highlight the importance of maintaining dignity by clarifying the scientific nature of trials and managing expectations. Additionally, post-trial access to healthcare is seen as a way to honor participants' dignity, ensuring they continue to receive care after the trial. Implementing dignity-focused interventions, like the dignity therapy model, can significantly enhance patients' sense of dignity during stressful treatments like hemodialysis.How has the evolution of flight comfort technology affected societal norms and expectations for air travel comfort?

The evolution of flight comfort technology has influenced societal norms and expectations for air travel comfort. Research shows that passenger comfort is a crucial factor in user acceptance of transportation systems. As technology advances, consumer expectations for product performance, including comfort, have risen significantly. This has led to a growing focus on improving passenger comfort in air travel, with airlines prioritizing the enhancement of the passenger experience. Additionally, the development of smart systems like neck support technology has been proposed to reduce stress and discomfort during flights, showcasing a shift towards integrating intelligent solutions for improved comfort. As awareness of climate impacts increases, societal norms are evolving to distinguish between necessary and excessive forms of air travel, reflecting changing attitudes towards the justification and purpose of flying.Why is business and politics clearly separated in the bureaucratic model?

In the bureaucratic model, the separation between business and politics is crucial due to the fundamental tensions that arise from delegating policymaking and implementation functions from politicians to bureaucrats. This model emphasizes the distinct roles of politicians and bureaucrats, highlighting the separation of political and administrative careers and the unique contributions each group makes to the policy-making process. Additionally, understanding the relationship between politics and bureaucracy is essential as bureaucracy is considered a part of organizational politics, influencing power dynamics within administrative units. The bureaucratic model underscores the need to maintain a clear boundary between business and politics to ensure accountability, effective decision-making, and to prevent conflicts of interest between permanent career bureaucrats and temporary executive politicians.Types of sustainability messages ?

Different types of sustainability messages include emotional, normative, gain, sensual, and guilt appeals. These messages play a crucial role in promoting sustainable behavior among consumers and employees. Sustainability messages can be framed in various ways to influence individuals' emotions, beliefs, and intentions towards sustainable practices. For instance, gain framing emphasizing cost-saving information has been found to have a powerful impact on encouraging sustainable choices. Additionally, the source of the message, whether it is from the company itself or a social media influencer, can also impact the effectiveness of sustainability communication. Overall, utilizing different message framing types and sources can effectively persuade stakeholders to engage in sustainable activities and support corporate sustainability initiatives.Why do Nigerian banks have a weak compliance and ethics culture?

Nigerian banks exhibit a weak compliance and ethics culture due to various factors highlighted in the research. The culture of accounting in Nigeria promotes creative accounting practices, income smoothing, and window dressing, indicating a lack of ethical considerations in financial reporting. Additionally, the prevalence of cyber-attacks and internet fraud in the banking sector is exacerbated by a lack of employee compliance with information security standards and policies. Furthermore, the voluntary nature of sustainability reporting in Nigeria allows for variations in ethical behavior among commercial banks, impacting the quantity and quality of disclosures related to environmental, social responsibility, and governance aspects. These findings collectively suggest that a combination of cultural, security, and ethical factors contribute to the weak compliance and ethics culture in Nigerian banks.