What is the neural correlate supporting evaluation of one's expertise?
Best insight from top research papers
The neural correlates supporting the evaluation of one's expertise involve differential activation and connectivity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Expertise is related to macroanatomical properties of domain-relevant brain regions and ultrastructural properties of gray and white matter, leading to more efficient task performance. Studies on object expertise show that the N170 component is enhanced in experts when categorizing objects within their domain, reflecting expertise in pattern recognition. Functional MRI studies reveal that experts exhibit greater neural processing efficiency in regions like the prefrontal cortex during nonanalytical reasoning, highlighting a multinetwork system supporting expert clinical reasoning. In sports expertise, badminton players demonstrate proficient modulation of brain activity during cognitive and motor preparation, enhancing response execution in domain-specific tasks.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
12 Citations | Expert badminton players show faster responses and greater P3 amplitudes during a badminton-specific attentional cueing task, indicating proficient modulation of brain activity related to cognitive and motor preparation. |
| Neural correlates supporting evaluation of expertise include macroanatomical properties of domain-specific brain regions, ultrastructural properties of gray and white matter, functional connectivity alterations, and memory and sensorimotor system specializations. | |
24 Citations | Experts show greater neural processing efficiency in the prefrontal cortex during nonanalytical reasoning, indicating a key neural correlate supporting evaluation of expertise in clinical reasoning. |
1 Citations | The N170 component in ERPs reflects object expertise and can be influenced by expertise in pattern recognition, as shown in medical experts evaluating ECG and CXR images. |
| Prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation and connectivity differentiate expertise levels in surgical performers, with experts showing task-specific patterns, indicating a neural basis for evaluating expertise. |
Related Questions
Are reaction time and accuracy during cognitive tasks correlated?4 answersReaction time (RT) and accuracy during cognitive tasks are often assumed to be correlated, reflecting cognitive ability. However, research suggests a weak association between RT and error costs across various tasks, with mean correlations around 0.17. In preschool-age children, while accuracy is indicative of cognitive flexibility, RT or a combination of RT and accuracy becomes a better performance index as they transition to school. Longitudinal studies show that slower RT precedes improvements in accuracy, highlighting a speed-accuracy tradeoff in cognitive development. Additionally, tablet-based cognitive assessments have shown trivial relationships with choice reaction time during a hopping task, indicating that performance on cognitive tests may not directly translate to functional reaction time assessments.
What factors makes an influencer as expertise?5 answersInfluencers are perceived as experts based on various factors such as their calibrated expertise, originality, uniqueness, and quality of posts. Additionally, influencers' expertise, attractiveness, and interaction significantly impact image satisfaction and advertising trust, ultimately influencing consumer purchase intentions. The priority of influencer characteristics in influencing purchasing decisions includes expertise, trustworthiness, and content attractiveness, with expertise and trustworthiness being crucial factors. Therefore, influencers who demonstrate knowledge, originality, and quality in their content, along with being perceived as trustworthy, are more likely to be considered experts and influence consumer behavior effectively.
What are the neural correlates of person perception?4 answersPerson perception involves understanding the internal biases and response tendencies of others. Neural evidence suggests that forming person knowledge on response biases involves several brain regions, including the caudate nucleus, DLPFC, hippocampus, dmPFC, and TPJ. Observing others' actions activates specific brain regions, including the motor system, which contains mirror neurons that simulate observed actions in a person's motor system. Hemispheric differences in the efficiency of categorization and individuation have been observed, with greater involvement of configural processing in individuation tasks, especially in the right hemisphere. Functional integration between the ventral visual stream and the theory-of-mind network is crucial for social perception, with the extrastriate body area showing greater coupling with the temporal pole when recalling stored social knowledge. The ventral auditory pathway in the cortex is responsible for transforming acoustic information into perceptual representations, including the processing of vocalizations and categorization.
What is the relationship between prior knowledge and the ability of evaluation?4 answersPrior knowledge has been found to have a direct influence on subsequent job knowledge acquisition and work-sample performance during training. However, in the context of evaluating others' knowledge and belief, it has been shown that evaluations of knowledge can be made without prior evaluations of belief. This suggests that individuals can accurately evaluate others' knowledge before evaluating their beliefs, indicating that knowledge representations are a distinctive and basic way in which we make sense of others' minds. Additionally, the ability to identify evaluation criteria plays an important role in integrity tests, suggesting that applicants who can identify what kind of behavior is evaluated positively can adapt their behavior accordingly. Overall, prior knowledge can influence various aspects of evaluation, including job knowledge acquisition, belief evaluations, and behavior adaptation in assessment situations.
What is the neural source of decision confidence?5 answersThe neural source of decision confidence is thought to originate from the prefrontal cortex, specifically the orbitofrontal cortex. This region of the brain is responsible for computing confidence in decision-making processes. Studies have shown that single neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode decision confidence, regardless of the sensory modality used to make a choice. These neurons also predict confidence-guided behaviors such as time investment and choice strategy updating. Additionally, a computational model consisting of a group of 'confidence neurons' with adaptation has been proposed to assess confidence by detecting the slope of ramping activities of decision neurons. This model captures the typical features of confidence observed in humans and animals experiments. Overall, the prefrontal cortex, particularly the orbitofrontal cortex, plays a crucial role in the neural representation of decision confidence.
What are the neurological correlates of trust?3 answersNeurological correlates of trust have been investigated in various domains, including automation, decision aids, and human-machine interactions. The neurotransmitters oxytocin and testosterone have been found to play a role in the decision to trust or distrust. The prefrontal cortex, insula, amygdala, caudate, and anterior paracingulate cortex have been identified as structural correlates involved in trust and distrust. EEG signals have been used to study the neural correlates of trust in autonomous systems, with significant correlations found in the frontal and occipital areas of the brain. EEG analysis has also revealed brain responses correlated with changes in trust levels, with the effects of trust variations being more pronounced when interacting with agents that are externally closer to humans. Understanding these neurological correlates of trust can contribute to the design of trusted autonomous systems and promote efficient interactions between humans and machines.