Search or ask a question

What is the recent system dynamic modeling in wetlands?

Sensitivity (control systems)

Nonlinear autoregressive exogenous model

Bifurcation diagram

Biogeochemistry

Best insight from top research papers

Recent system dynamic modeling in wetlands involves utilizing advanced techniques like Nonlinear Autoregressive with Exogenous Inputs (NARX) models for predicting wetland extent. These models aid in understanding complex wetland processes, such as biogeochemical exchanges and pollutant degradation mechanisms. Additionally, studies focus on specific aspects like total nitrogen transformation in mangrove-filled wetlands, highlighting the sensitivity of parameters like garbage levels in maintaining mangrove biomass. Furthermore, system dynamic models are applied to shared water resources like the Hoor-Al-Azim/Hawizeh wetland, simulating interactions among riparian countries and evaluating scenarios for sustainable management. The development of dynamic models, such as those simulating pollutant treatment in artificial wetlands, enhances the design and efficiency of wetland systems for environmental practitioners.

Answers from top 4 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (4)	Insight
Open access Modeling of the Water Resources system of Hoor-Al-Azim/Hawizeh Wetland using System Dynamics Approach Nargeskhatoon Dowlatabadi, Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib, Abbas Roozbahani - Show less +2 more 22 Aug 2020	The recent system dynamics modeling in the Hoor-Al-Azim/Hawizeh wetland focused on interactions among Iran, Iraq, and Turkey's water systems, aiding policy-makers in evaluating management decisions for environmental improvement.
Book Chapter•DOI Modeling approaches for simulating the processes of wetland ecosystems 01 Jan 2023	Recent system dynamic modeling in wetlands aims to understand degradation mechanisms, pollutant transformations, and wetland dynamics. Various simulation models are utilized to simulate complex wetland processes effectively.
Open access•Journal Article•DOI Continuous and Discrete Dynamical Models of Total Nitrogen Transformation in a Constructed Wetland: Sensitivity and Bifurcation Analysis Sunarsih Sunarsih, Moch Fandi Ansori, Siti Khabibah, Dwiwahju Sasongko - Show less +3 more 14 Sep 2022-Symmetry 1 Citations	The recent system dynamic modeling in wetlands focuses on total nitrogen transformation in a constructed wetland using continuous and discrete dynamical models with sensitivity and bifurcation analysis.
Proceedings Article•DOI Nonlinear multivariate modelling of wetland dynamics Angesh Anupam 25 Nov 2022	The recent system dynamic modeling in wetlands involves multivariate nonlinear modeling using NARX model, incorporating weather variables and wetland fractions to predict wetland extent accurately.

My columns

Related Questions

What is Dynamic Modelling of Systems (DMS)?5 answersDynamic Modelling of Systems (DMS) is a computational method that focuses on developing dynamic mathematical models to describe relevant factors in food processes, aiming to enhance safety and quality indicators in unprocessed food systems and transformation processes. DMS is also utilized in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) as a Dynamic Multitask System, offering a flexible approach for researchers and practitioners to develop state-of-the-art multitask NLP tools efficiently. Additionally, DMS can be applied in business and management contexts, where it distinguishes dynamic models from static ones by emphasizing complexity, flexibility, innovation, and problem-solving abilities, particularly in the realm of strategic performance management. Overall, DMS serves as a versatile tool across various disciplines, enabling the development of sophisticated models to address complex system behaviors over time.

What is System Dynamics in flood risk management?3 answersSystem Dynamics in flood risk management refers to the application of a systems approach to understand and manage the complex interactions and feedbacks within flood risk systems. This approach recognizes that flood risk is influenced by various factors, including hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and decision-making processes. By adopting a systems perspective, policymakers and flood risk managers can gain a more comprehensive understanding of flood risk, identify relevant interactions, and quantify feedbacks in order to develop effective risk reduction strategies. It involves considering the dynamic nature of flood risk and accounting for spatial and temporal dependencies and changes in risk components. System Dynamics also emphasizes the need to integrate various measures and investments, such as infrastructure improvements, technology advancements, capacity building, and risk transfer options, to enhance community flood resilience and achieve sustainable flood risk management. This approach aims to guide cost-effective and sustainable flood risk mitigation efforts by considering the broader system-wide impacts of measures implemented in different locations.

What are the different ways to model a wetland?5 answersThere are different ways to model a wetland. One approach is to use simulation models, which are robust tools for understanding the complex processes of wetland ecosystems. These models can help gain insights into wetland systems and manipulate system processes to achieve desired results. Another approach is to represent wetland-groundwater-upland interactions in land surface models (LSMs), which are the terrestrial lower boundary of Earth system models (ESMs). This can involve parametrizations that vary in system and computational complexity, depending on the land cover, soil type, and modeling purpose. Constructed wetlands, which are used for wastewater treatment, can be modeled using hydraulic modeling techniques. Tracer studies are commonly used to determine the hydraulic behavior of the system, which is crucial for understanding contaminant breakdown processes. Additionally, artificial wetland models can be created to simulate the operation of real constructed wetlands and demonstrate their purification function. Finally, LiDAR technology has potential applications in wetland research, including mapping, classification, hydrological modeling, and biomass estimation.

How can dynamic system modeling be used to study the impact of climate change in groundwater?4 answersDynamic system modeling can be used to study the impact of climate change in groundwater by quantifying the response of groundwater to climate variability and change. This can be achieved by analyzing groundwater hydrographs over multiple decades to understand the long-term changes in groundwater head and recharge. However, there are challenges in separating the impact of climatic change on groundwater from other influential drivers, such as pumping for agricultural irrigation, land use changes, and natural climate variability. Groundwater modeling is crucial for the sustainable and efficient management of groundwater, and different types of modeling approaches can be used depending on data availability and aquifer features. Spatially-distributed models can be developed to anticipate the expected impacts of climate change on hydrosystems and to plan mitigation measures. Deep learning models, such as Convolutional Neural Networks, can also be used to estimate groundwater levels and assess the influence of climate change on groundwater resources. Overall, dynamic system modeling provides a valuable tool for understanding and predicting the impact of climate change on groundwater resources.

What is dynamic modelling in fishery?5 answersDynamic modelling in fishery refers to the use of complex models to investigate the functioning of fisheries and assess the impact of management strategies, particularly spatial fishing regulations. These models are used to simulate the dynamics of fish populations, fishing fleets, and economic factors in order to understand how different management measures may affect the fishery system. The models take into account various factors such as population dynamics, fleet dynamics, and the behavior of fishing firms. By using dynamic simulation models, stakeholders can gain insights into the potential impacts of alternative management measures and make more informed decisions. Dynamic modelling allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the fishery system and can help in developing sustainable management policies.

What are the benefits of using dynamic modelling for fisheries management?5 answersمدلسازی پویا مزایای متعددی برای مدیریت شیلاتی فراهم می کند. اولاً، ماهیت پیچیده اکوسیستم ها و عدم قطعیت های مرتبط با مشاهدات و دینامیک را در نظر می گیرد، که اغلب حتی در غیاب شیلاتی یا تعاملهای بین اختصاصی وجود دارند. ثانیا، مدلهای پویا سرریز ماهی و لارو به مناطق صید شده و همچنین جابجایی ماهیگیران به مکان های محافظت نشده را در نظر می گیرند و درک جامع تری از تأثیرات ذخایر دریایی بر اهداف شیلاتی و حفاظتی را فراهم می کنند. علاوه بر این، مدل های پویا پراکندگی لارو را در نظر می گیرند و امکان شناسایی ذخایر را فراهم می کنند که مزایای بلند مدت سرریز لارو را به حداکثر می رسانند. این مدل ها همچنین ارزیابی استراتژی های مختلف مدیریت و تأثیرات آنها بر شاخص های مختلف مانند سلامت ذخایر ماهی، اشتغال و سود را امکان پذیر می سازد. به طور کلی، مدل سازی پویا با در نظر گرفتن پیچیدگی ها و عدم قطعیت های اکوسیستم ها و همچنین تعامل بین شیلاتی و اهداف حفاظت، تصمیم گیری در مدیریت شیلاتی را افزایش می دهد.

See what other people are reading

How does organic carbon affect nitrogen and phosphorus available in the soil?

Organic carbon plays a crucial role in influencing the availability of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in soil. Studies have shown that in subtropical forests, the addition of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) can accelerate soil organic carbon (SOC) turnover, impacting nutrient availability. Additionally, in the Karst region, the application of organic materials combined with inorganic fertilizers significantly increased soil total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and other P fractions, enhancing soil fertility. Furthermore, in Tibetan meadows, long-term nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilization accelerated soil organic matter decomposition, affecting carbon balance and nutrient release. These findings highlight the intricate relationship between organic carbon and the availability of nitrogen and phosphorus in soil, emphasizing the importance of organic inputs in nutrient cycling and soil fertility management.Is predicting the water level of a river possible?

Predicting the water level of a river is indeed possible through various models and algorithms. Different approaches have been proposed, such as using Machine Learning (ML) algorithms like Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), Nonlinear Autoregressive with Exogenous Input (NARX) neural network, and hybrid models like Marine Predators algorithm (MPA) combined with artificial neural network (ANN). These models have shown promising results in accurately forecasting water levels in rivers, enabling better planning for flood risk mitigation and monitoring. The effectiveness of these models is evident in their ability to capture spatiotemporal fluctuations, handle complex river networks, and provide reliable predictions with reduced uncertainty, making them valuable tools for water level forecasting in river systems.What are the effects of Iron as a pollutant on humans and the environment?

Iron as a pollutant can have significant impacts on both humans and the environment. In terms of human health, exposure to environmental pollutants can disrupt iron metabolism, leading to disorders ranging from anemia to neurodegenerative diseases and cancer. Additionally, toxic metals associated with steelmaking activities, such as Cu and Zn, contribute to aquatic and terrestrial ecotoxicity, while As and Pb contamination pose significant risks to human health. On the environmental front, iron's presence in particulate matter air pollution can generate oxidants and electrophiles, inducing inflammation and oxidative stress upon inhalation, thus posing a global health risk. Understanding the mechanisms of iron's interaction with pollutants is crucial for developing intervention methods to mitigate these adverse effects on both human health and the environment.What are the limitations of metrics such as levelized cost of electricity and levelized cost of hydrogen?

The limitations of metrics such as the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) and the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) stem from various factors that influence their accuracy and comprehensiveness in evaluating energy projects. One significant limitation of the LCOE is its neglect of certain key terms like inflation, integration costs, and system costs, which can lead to an incomplete assessment of electricity generation projects. Additionally, the LCOE's sensitivity to the input variables of energy projects, such as capital and operational expenses, can vary significantly, making it a less reliable metric for comparing generation technologies without a nuanced sensitivity analysis. Moreover, the LCOE and LCOH metrics do not account for the environmental impact costs directly, such as carbon emissions, which are increasingly relevant in the context of global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This oversight can lead to an underestimation of the true cost of energy projects that have significant carbon footprints. The introduction of modified metrics like MLCOE and MLACE attempts to address these shortcomings by incorporating dominant factors of construction and operation expenses through the payback period, providing a more accurate estimation for power plant investments. The LCOE also faces challenges in reflecting the dynamic value of new nuclear investments, as its stability and relevance can fluctuate with evolving evaluation and valuation processes. Furthermore, the metric's effectiveness can vary over time and under different economic conditions, as historical data on fuel prices and capital costs can significantly influence the calculated costs. In the broader context of energy transition and climate policy, the reliance on LCOE and similar metrics can lead to misleading conclusions due to their inability to fully capture the complexities of transitioning to renewable and non-combustible energy sources. Additionally, the lack of credible objective metrics to measure progress towards sustainability goals, such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), highlights the need for more comprehensive and adaptable metrics that can align financial investments with environmental and health impacts. In summary, while LCOE and LCOH provide useful benchmarks for comparing the costs of different energy projects, their limitations, including the neglect of environmental costs, sensitivity to input variables, and the need for more comprehensive metrics that account for the full lifecycle and impact of energy projects, suggest the need for refined and more holistic approaches to evaluating energy investments.Why lakes are important in identifying environmental situation? recent studies?

Lakes are crucial for identifying environmental conditions due to their role as sentinels of global change, regulating climate, water resources, and biodiversity. Recent studies highlight their significance in recording past environmental alterations, including climate change impacts, biogeochemical cycles, and anthropogenic influences. They serve as archives of long-term environmental shifts, offering insights into climate change, land-use alterations, and pollution levels. Lakes play a pivotal role in the global water cycle, energy balance, and carbon dynamics, making them essential for understanding historical and future climate change impacts. The Lake-TopoCat database provides detailed lake hydrography information, aiding in deciphering lake drainage topology for improved modeling of water quality, connectivity, and integrated lake-river systems.How does the Calphad method optimize the model parameters of phases?

The CALPHAD method optimizes model parameters of phases through various approaches. ESPEI utilizes Bayesian optimization within a Markov Chain Monte Carlo machine learning strategy to refine Gibbs energy functions based on thermochemical and phase equilibrium data, quantifying uncertainties and propagating them to the functions. Another study proposes a deep learning approach to train CALPHAD model parameters solely based on chemical formula, showcasing the potential for automated comprehensive CALPHAD modeling. Uncertainty quantification in CALPHAD calculations can be achieved through a generalized method of propagating uncertainty by local expansion, allowing for any Gibbs free energy model or number of components to be used, thus advancing the methodology. Additionally, DFT data must be fitted to a thermodynamic model using the CALPHAD technique, often requiring adjustments to obtain the correct set of stable phases at varying compositions and temperatures.How to calculate space cooling loads in German standard? Write as much detail as possible?

In the German standard for calculating space cooling loads, various methods can be employed, such as a monthly quasi-steady state method, a simplified hourly method, and detailed simulation. To enhance the accuracy of cooling load predictions, preprocessing of training data is crucial, including the removal of missing values during HVAC system off-times and adjusting structural parameters for model optimization. Understanding the impact of factors like indoor set point, heat sources, and convective heat transfer through the building envelope is essential for tailored cooling load calculations. Linear regression models based on radiant time series components have been developed to estimate cooling loads, considering factors like building materials, environment, and occupant characteristics. Additionally, interactive online programs have been designed to aid engineering and architecture students in learning residential cooling load calculations.What is the refractive index of graphene of various thicknesses?

The refractive index of graphene varies with its thickness. For a chemical-vapor-deposition (CVD)-grown graphene monolayer, the refractive index is reported to be 3.135 at a wavelength of 670 nm. Few-layer graphene, including monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer, exhibits unique optical indices that cannot be explained by a common constant index, with each layer having its distinct refractive index values. Additionally, phase-shifting interferometric imaging estimates the refractive index of graphene to be around 2.99 ± 0.18, highlighting its high refractive index property that enables precise thickness resolution of ≤0.05 nm for graphene films. These findings collectively demonstrate the thickness-dependent refractive index behavior of graphene, crucial for various applications requiring accurate optical characterization.How does Artificial intelligence impact in transportation safety Industry?

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a crucial role in enhancing transportation safety. By deploying AI in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), such as Intelligent Transportation Cyber-Physical Systems (ITCPS), safety services can be improved through predictive analytics and effective dissemination of safety messages. Ensuring the reliability of AI decisions is vital to minimize safety risks, with a focus on reducing false negatives and designing "safety regions" in the feature space. The integration of AI in transportation systems aims to bridge the gap between human and artificial driver behaviors, addressing challenges like real-time behavior prediction and safe interaction among drivers. Additionally, AI-based systems like cognitive agent collision detection and rescue systems leverage IoT and deep learning models to enhance accident response efficiency and save lives.How far along is the Mu3e experiment?

The Mu3e experiment, located at the Paul Scherrer Institute in Switzerland, is making significant progress. The experiment aims to detect the rare lepton flavor violating decay $\mu^+ \rightarrow e^+e^-e^+$. Currently, the first phase of the experiment is under construction, with an ultimate sensitivity goal of $10^{-16}$ on the branching fraction of the decay. This phase is expected to achieve a branching ratio sensitivity of $2\cdot10^{-15}$ by observing $10^8$ muon decays per second over a year of data taking. The detector system, including high-voltage monolithic active pixel sensors and scintillating timing detectors, will generate around 100 GB/s of data, which will be processed by a sophisticated Data Acquisition System (DAQ).Are vibration problems very popular in timber floors?

Vibration issues in timber floors are indeed prevalent and well-recognized in the construction industry. Lightweight timber structures are particularly susceptible to vibrations, leading to discomfort for occupants. Research has highlighted the challenges posed by the lightweight nature of timber structures, making them more prone to vibrations compared to heavier materials. Complaints about vibration serviceability in lightweight timber floors have been increasing since the 1970s, especially in social housing projects, emphasizing the significance of this issue. The lack of validated methods for evaluating vibration performance in long-span timber floors has led to these concerns often being overlooked during the design stage, necessitating a focus on addressing vibration problems to enhance occupant comfort and optimize design.