What is the relation between the theory of bourdieu and elias?
Best insight from top research papers
The relationship between Pierre Bourdieu's and Norbert Elias's theories lies in their contributions to relational sociology. Bourdieu's focus on social inequalities, domination, and symbolic violence complements Elias's more relational approach, which emphasizes the interdependence of actors in complex social transactions. Bourdieu's concept of habitus, influenced by various theoretical sources, including Elias, aligns with Elias's sociological habitus concept, indicating a clear influence of Elias on Bourdieu's work. Both scholars address the displacement of the object of sociology towards the relations between individuals, emphasizing the importance of understanding social phenomena in a relational context. By combining their perspectives, a more comprehensive understanding of social dynamics, power structures, and symbolic interactions can be achieved, enriching sociological analysis.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Bourdieu and Elias share deep conceptual affinities, with their combined perspectives offering a more fertile vision than individually, as seen through their triadic approaches and empirical investigations. | |
01 Jan 2013 1 Citations | Norbert Elias' social habitus serves as a precursor to Bourdieu's habitus theory, with Bourdieu referencing Elias frequently, although systematic integration of their sociological theories remains limited. |
Open access 01 Jan 2012 | Both Bourdieu and Elias focus on the relations between individuals, emphasizing social phenomena, historical context, and a multidisciplinary approach, showing more similarities than differences in their sociological theories. |
| Elias is more relational while Bourdieu is more deterministic. Bourdieu's focus on social inequalities can complement Elias's approach, potentially helping to overcome some limitations. | |
| Bourdieu and Elias share a focus on the civilizing process, symbolic power, and decivilizing periods, emphasizing State monopolies and societal transformations, enriching each other's theories. |
Related Questions
Is Bourdieu's theory of capital related with family SES?5 answersBourdieu's theory of capital, particularly family cultural capital, is closely linked to family socioeconomic status (SES). Family cultural capital, which includes resources, practices, and parental activities, significantly influences adolescents' digital skills and media usage, bridging the gap between social origins and digital diversity. Moreover, familial capital, encompassing economic, social, and cultural aspects, plays a crucial role in shaping educational choices and opportunities for higher education. Despite adolescents often denying parental influence on their educational decisions, familial capital mediates this influence, reflecting Bourdieu's concept of symbolic violence in educational choices. Therefore, Bourdieu's theory of capital, especially family cultural capital, is intricately intertwined with family SES, impacting various aspects of educational and digital outcomes.
What sociologists complete bourdieu's theory?5 answersKarl Maton proposes that Bourdieu's theory of fields can be enhanced by incorporating Legitimation Code Theory (LCT) to achieve a fully relational analysis. Michał Wolniak and Stan Houston emphasize the relevance of Bourdieu's concepts like habitus, capital, field, and reflexivity in augmenting critical and radical social work, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive exploration of the 'symbolic' aspect of Bourdieu's theory. Willem Schinkel and Jacques Tacq discuss how Bourdieu's relational logic, influenced by Saussure, complements his analysis by focusing on the arbitrary nature of class distinctions and rejecting Kantian aesthetics. Ciaran Burke elaborates on the significance of habitus, capital, and field in Bourdieu's theory of practice, particularly emphasizing the complexity of cultural capital and the interplay between habitus and field.
How Pierre Bourdieu's concepts are used in studies of economic behaviour and entrepreneurship?10 answersPierre Bourdieu's theoretical framework, particularly his concepts of habitus, field, capital, and symbolic violence, has significantly influenced studies of economic behavior and entrepreneurship. Bourdieu's dispositional theory of practice, as discussed by Adam Hayes, integrates sociological traditions with behavioral economics, emphasizing bounded rationality, fairness, and social preferences, thereby offering a nuanced understanding of economic behaviors. This integration is crucial for comprehending the complex interplay between individual dispositions and economic actions.
Frédéric Lebaron highlights the relevance of geometric data analysis (GDA) in economics, inspired by Bourdieu's multidimensional approach to studying economic spaces and fields. This methodology allows for a more pluralistic understanding of economic institutions and their dynamics, moving beyond mainstream economics' limitations. Similarly, Frank Hillebrandt notes the significant impact of Bourdieu's work on economic sociology, particularly through his analysis of the social structures underlying economic practices.
Loïc Wacquant elaborates on Bourdieu's methodological principles, emphasizing the importance of epistemological vigilance and the triple historicization of habitus, social space, and analytical categories. This approach is vital for conducting rigorous inquiry into economic phenomena and avoiding the pitfalls of concept fetishization and theoretical imposition. Georgette Vargas Huanca's analysis further underscores the utility of Bourdieu's concepts in explaining individuals' acceptance of social orders and roles, which are crucial for understanding economic behaviors within specific fields.
Fernando Proto Gutiérrez and José Javier Capera Figueroa discuss Bourdieu's political thought, which provides a theoretical construct for analyzing social relations and symbolic systems in economic contexts. This perspective is essential for understanding the symbolic dimensions of economic power and practice. Mega Mustikasari and colleagues highlight Bourdieu's influence on cultural studies, including his structural-constructive method, which emphasizes the role of actors in forming practices. This approach is relevant for understanding how economic behaviors are shaped by cultural and social structures.
Finally, Elina Meliou and Mustafa Fatih Ozbilgin's study on gender and entrepreneurship utilizes Bourdieu's ideas to explore how women entrepreneurs navigate gender inequality. This research demonstrates the application of Bourdieu's concepts in analyzing the trade-offs and mechanisms through which economic behaviors and entrepreneurial practices are influenced by gender dynamics.
In summary, Bourdieu's concepts provide a robust theoretical foundation for analyzing economic behavior and entrepreneurship, offering insights into the socio-cultural, symbolic, and structural dimensions that shape economic practices and institutions.
Who influenced the thought of Bourdieu?5 answersPierre Bourdieu's thinking was influenced by a wide array of prominent figures from various fields. Despite having theoretical differences, Bourdieu shared a common ethos with Erving Goffman, appreciating each other's commitment to science and empirical work. Additionally, Bourdieu's relationship with journalism was ambivalent, acknowledging its role in shaping public discourse while also critiquing its influence on cultural production. Furthermore, a thought partnership between Bourdieu and Carl Jung was explored to understand unconscious influences on professional practices, highlighting the integration of Bourdieusian and Jungian thinking tools in critical inquiry. Overall, Bourdieu's thoughts were shaped by a diverse range of thinkers, reflecting his interdisciplinary approach to understanding social reality.
What are the Limitations of Bourdieu’s Theory?5 answersBourdieu's theory has several limitations. Firstly, his ideas on social change, while acknowledging the agency of individuals, delimit the scope of change within the social system. Secondly, his writings on journalism display an underlying ambiguity regarding its status and legitimacy, which undermines the objective critique of the field. Thirdly, his aesthetic approach is criticized for its partiality and failure to extract reflexivity from the aesthetic experience. Lastly, his theory of the state vacillates between a strong and weak perspective, lacking in its treatment of violence and coercion. These limitations highlight the need for a critical evaluation of Bourdieu's ideas and their practical implications.
What are the key concepts of Bourdieu's practice theory?5 answersBourdieu's practice theory is based on three key concepts: habitus, field, and capital. Habitus refers to the internalized dispositions and behaviors that individuals acquire through socialization and shape their actions and perceptions. It is influenced by social class, race, and other factors. Field refers to the social spaces or domains in which individuals interact and compete for resources and power. It includes various fields such as education, politics, and economics. Capital refers to the different forms of resources that individuals possess, such as economic, cultural, and social capital, which can be used to gain advantage in the field. These concepts are interconnected and shape social practices and power dynamics. Bourdieu's theory emphasizes the role of both objective structures and individual agency in social practice.