What kind of tools to measure back pain patient?
Best insight from top research papers
Various tools are used to measure back pain in patients. The Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP) is a valid and reliable tool that assesses the ability of individuals with non-specific low back pain to self-manage their illness . Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and screening tools (STs) are commonly used in chiropractic teaching clinics in the United States to assess low back pain. These include disability/functional measures, pain measures, psychosocial measures, and other measures . Psychosocial measures such as the Keele STarT Back Tool and the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) tool can be used to predict improvements in disability and pain for patients seeking physical therapy care for low back pain . Passive microwave radiometry (MWR) is another tool that can be used to assess the effectiveness of various treatment methods for acute and subacute nonspecific low back pain . Different pain assessment tools are available based on their psychometric properties and ease of use, including LBP-specific tools like the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), generic tools like the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and tools for neuropathic LBP, cognitively impaired patients, and acute pain .
Answers from top 4 papers
More filters
| Papers (4) | Insight |
|---|---|
36 Citations | The paper discusses various tools to measure back pain in patients, including the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), among others. |
| The paper mentions several tools used to measure back pain in patients, including the Keele STarT Back Screening (SBST), the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) tool, the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Review of Symptoms (OSPRO-ROS) and the Review of Symptoms Plus (OSPRO-ROS+) tools, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and the National Institute of Health Chronic Pain Criteria (NIH-CP). | |
| The paper describes the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and screening tools (STs) for low back pain patients in chiropractic teaching institutions. The tools used include disability/functional measures, pain measures, psychosocial measures, and others. | |
| The paper describes the development and measurement properties of the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP), which is a tool to measure enablement in people seeking care for non-specific low back pain. |
Related Questions
How can patient adherence be measured?5 answersPatient adherence can be measured through various methods, including direct and indirect approaches. Direct methods involve objective measures like blood samples, while indirect methods include pill counts and questionnaires. Additionally, patient/caregiver/clinician reported outcomes can be assessed through diaries, interviews, and surveys. Studies have shown the importance of measuring adherence in chronic patients, with the development and validation of scales to assess adherence levels. For instance, the Modified Morisky Scale has been utilized to measure adherence to oral anticancer treatments, demonstrating the significance of motivation and knowledge levels in patient adherence. Overall, a multi-modal approach combining objective and subjective measures is recommended for accurately estimating patient adherence.
What are the most commonly used core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain?4 answersThe most commonly used core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) include the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ-24) for physical functioning, and the Short Form Health Survey 12 (SF12) or 10-item PROMIS Global Health (PROMIS-GH-10) for health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These instruments have been recommended by international consensus for over 20 years and have shown good reliability and validity in assessing outcomes related to NSLBP. Despite the availability of these core outcome measurement instruments, studies have shown that there is still variability in their usage in clinical trials, highlighting the importance of promoting their consistent implementation to enhance the comparability and reliability of trial results in the management of NSLBP.
How many pain assessment tools exist?4 answersThere are a total of 36 pain assessment tools identified in the abstracts provided. However, it is important to note that the evidence on the psychometric properties and clinical utility of these tools varies widely, ranging from low to good reliability and validity. Currently, no observer-administered pain assessment tool can be recommended as the gold standard due to limited availability and quality of evidence supporting their validity, reliability, and clinical utility. In the context of infants, there are seven pain assessment tools that have been reported in at least three reviews. In the context of both ambulatory and acute care settings, there are eight multidimensional pain assessment tools that nurses can use to capture patients' experience of pain. In the context of patients with dementia or cognitive impairment, there are a total of 28 pain assessment tools available, but there is limited evidence on their reliability, validity, and clinical utility. In the context of palliative care, there are 11 different pain assessment tools identified, but none of them contain all the relevant dimensions as defined by experts.
What are the different types of radiologic spine measurements?5 answersRadiologic measurements play a key role in the diagnosis of spinal diseases. Various specialized committees have developed diagnostic standards for scoliosis and degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Accurate radiographic measurement of sagittal alignment is essential for evaluating adult spinal deformity (ASD). The radiologic study of choice for assessing most diseases of the spine is the MRI, which allows for the assessment of osseous contours, spinal column areas, and the conus medullaris. The evaluation and treatment of spinal deformities begin with the accurate measurement of appropriate spinal parameters. Multiple methods have been used to assess spinal fusion, including static radiographs, dynamic radiographs, radiostereometric analysis, CT, and MRI.
How to measure scoliosis to improve physioterapic assessment?4 answersPhysiotherapeutic measurements for scoliosis assessment can be improved by using specialized physiotherapists to perform the measurements. In a study by Lukovic et al., it was found that basic physiotherapeutic measurements were valid and reliable when performed by experienced physiotherapists. These measurements included body height and weight, chest girth, leg length, spine translation, pelvic tilt, shoulder equality, scapula position, stature triangles, rib hump, iliopsoas contracture, Frohner index, lumbar lordosis, and trunk rotation angle. The use of specialized physiotherapists can be particularly valuable when performing measurements on subjects with scoliosis. This approach can help ensure accurate and consistent measurements, leading to improved assessment and monitoring of scoliosis.
What are the best ways to measure patient satisfaction?5 answersPatient satisfaction can be measured in various ways, using different satisfaction metrics. However, there is no universally accepted "gold standard" method for measuring patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction surveys are commonly used as a measuring tool, as they aim to translate subjective accounts into quantifiable and actionable data. To assess patient satisfaction effectively, it is important to decide which aspects of patient satisfaction to measure, develop reliable and valid questions, sample individuals from a wider patient population, and use standardized techniques such as surveys or interviews. Additionally, patient experience metrics have become important in evaluating the overall patient experience, which includes various components of care and may go beyond the immediate control of healthcare providers. Validated instruments can be used to measure patient satisfaction with physician interaction, focusing on domains such as communication skills, empathy, and trust in the physician. Overall, a combination of surveys, validated instruments, and patient experience metrics can provide valuable insights into measuring patient satisfaction.