What methods do archaeologists use to analyze the geological composition of the support structures of rock art?
Best insight from top research papers
Archaeologists utilize a variety of methods to analyze the geological composition of the support structures of rock art. These methods include color spectrophotometry, portable Raman spectroscopy, stereomicroscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, SEM-EDS, XRD analyses, physical and mechanical tests, and portable XRF analysis . By employing these techniques, researchers can determine the mineralogical composition, texture, petrophysical properties, and chemical-mineralogical composition of the support structures. Additionally, these analyses help in identifying the provenance of the raw materials used in creating the rock art, aiding in understanding the geological sources of the materials and the potential implications for the interpretation and preservation of the rock art sites.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Archaeologists use SEM-EDS, XRD, physical, mechanical tests, and portable XRF for mineralogical, petrophysical, and provenance analysis of lithic findings in rock shelters, as shown in the study. | |
2 Citations | Archaeologists analyze the geological composition of rock art support structures using techniques like X-ray diffraction, stereomicroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy, as outlined in the study. |
20 Jun 2022 | Archaeologists use methods like RS, OM, XRM, and SEM to analyze the geological composition of support structures of rock art, aiding in preservation decisions based on unique microclimates. |
30 Jun 2014 2 Citations | Not addressed in the paper. |
| Not addressed in the paper. |
Related Questions
How do lithic analysis use seriation to anlayse morphologies?5 answersLithic analysis employs seriation to analyze morphologies by leveraging a variety of methodological approaches that quantify and compare the shape and form of stone tools. This process involves the systematic arrangement of artifacts in a sequence to infer chronological ordering and understand technological evolution and variability. Geometric morphometrics, a key tool in this endeavor, captures the morphological and technological attributes of lithic artifacts, allowing for the quantification of shape variation and the testing of the discreteness of different categories of flakes, as demonstrated in the analysis of Paleolithic lithic assemblages. Similarly, the pixel difference method offers a novel approach to comparing the 2D shape of handaxes by grading them based on the difference in pixel counts of their silhouettes, thus providing a numerical value for shape similarity or difference.
The application of geometric morphometrics to the study of bifacial artefact morphology, such as handaxes and Keilmesser, further illustrates the utility of seriation in assessing variability and identifying patterned changes that may result from continuous reduction or diachronic changes in artefact design. The use of three-dimensional laser scanning and geometric morphometrics preserves geometric information and exploits powerful analytical techniques, enhancing the analysis of lithic artifacts. Moreover, the replicability study involving multiple analysts and a range of attributes demonstrates the potential for comparative lithic analyses to achieve high inter-analyst replicability scores, highlighting the reliability of certain attributes for seriation.
Micro-photogrammetry and geometric morphometrics have also been applied to distinguish morphological differences in cut marks produced by different lithic tool types, aiding in the understanding of butchering activities and tool production. Three-dimensional modelling techniques quantify artefact morphology and permit objective comparison of shape variations, facilitating an intuitive understanding of perceived variation. However, the methodological diversity and issues related to landmark selection in geometric morphometric analysis highlight the challenges in achieving comparability and interoperability, underscoring the need for standardized protocols.
The cultural–evolutionary analysis of lithic variability, integrating a "quantitative genetics" approach, models multiple sources of variation simultaneously, addressing the challenge of reconciling heritable and nonheritable sources of variation. Finally, Elliptic Fourier Analysis and landmark/semi-landmark based methods generate quantitative information on outline variation in lithic artifacts, supporting the exploration of morphological variation and its relation to metric variation. Together, these methodologies underscore the multifaceted approach of lithic analysis in using seriation to analyze morphologies, from capturing and quantifying shape variation to addressing the challenges of comparability and the integration of evolutionary frameworks.
What are the most commonly used statistical methods for analyzing temporal changes in lithic size?5 answersAnalyzing temporal changes in lithic size involves a variety of statistical methods, each tailored to address specific aspects of lithic analysis and the inherent challenges of archaeological data. The "quantitative genetics" approach, as discussed by Stephen J. Lycett and Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel, offers a comprehensive framework for modeling multiple sources of variation, including temporal changes, by simultaneously considering heritable and nonheritable factors. This approach is particularly useful in reconciling the effects of raw material and reduction factors on lithic size and shape.
Geometric morphometric methods (GMMs), highlighted by Felix Riede and colleagues, have gained prominence for their ability to statistically quantify complex shapes, which can then be used to infer temporal changes among other factors. GMMs, especially when applied in a standardized manner, can provide insights into social interaction, function, and reduction processes over time, although challenges related to methodological diversity and landmark selection need to be addressed for consistent application.
Empirical Bayesian methods, as described by Javier Fernández-López de Pablo and C. Michael Barton, offer a powerful tool for dating lithic assemblages and estimating the probability of occupation during different temporal periods. This approach allows for the integration of prior knowledge with statistical analysis, providing a nuanced understanding of temporal changes in lithic assemblages.
Multivariate analyses, including quadratic and linear discriminant analyses, principal component analyses, and dissimilarity matrices, have been successfully used to identify discrete reduction trajectories and assess variability in lithic assemblages, as demonstrated by Eleanor M. L. Scerri and colleagues. These methods are sensitive to the inherent variability in lithic data and can effectively separate individual refitted sets based on attribute measurements, offering a quantified approach for comparative analyses.
In summary, the most commonly used statistical methods for analyzing temporal changes in lithic size include quantitative genetics approaches, geometric morphometric methods, empirical Bayesian methods, and various multivariate analyses. Each method addresses different aspects of lithic analysis and, when applied judiciously, can provide significant insights into the temporal dynamics of lithic assemblages.
What are the geophysical investigation methods for identifying subsurface structures?5 answersGeophysical investigation methods for identifying subsurface structures include electrical methods, seismic methods, magnetic prospecting method, and electromagnetic prospecting methods. These methods are used to delineate subsurface geological features before the construction of building structures and can also be used to investigate design parameters for geotechnical engineering. Geophysical studies, such as gravity data analysis, can be used to detect lineaments that are related to the boundaries of subsurface structures. In archaeometrical surveys, geophysical techniques such as magnetic methods and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) are commonly used to study subsurface structures, with GPR being particularly useful in cases where the surrounding material is similar to the buried structures and the subsurface is dry. Atomic force microscopy techniques, such as rapid indentation, can also be used to study subsurface structures and obtain physical and mechanical properties simultaneously with surface topography. Additionally, a subsurface structure identification system based on convolutional neural networks has been developed for identifying subsurface structures in seismic data.
How is bayesian method used to improve archaeological reasoning?4 answersBayesian methods are used in archaeology to improve reasoning by providing a framework for analyzing patterns of cultural change and diversity over time. These methods allow for the reconstruction of evolutionary relationships in a more robust manner, enabling researchers to ask new questions about the pace of cultural change, periods of cultural divergence, and rates of cultural diversification. Bayesian statistics also offer a way to combine information from diverse sources, such as stratigraphic data and radiocarbon dating, which can have non-normal probability distributions. By combining this information, Bayesian statistics have been successful in improving the precision and accuracy of archaeological chronologies. Additionally, Bayesian methods can be used to refine dating when multiple data from different dating techniques are available, allowing for more accurate evaluations of stratigraphies and chronologies. Overall, Bayesian methods provide a powerful tool for analyzing archaeological data and generating more nuanced interpretations of the past.
How can petrographic analysis can be used to determine the rock and rock condition?5 answersPetrographic analysis is a technique used to determine the rock type and condition. It involves assessing the mineral content and rock texture through the examination of thin sections under a microscope. Petrographic analysis can provide information about the stratigraphy of a region, as well as the mineral composition and texture of the rock. It can also be used for rock classification, particularly in the field of geosciences, by employing convolutional neural networks to classify rock types based on thin section images. Additionally, petrographic analysis can be used to determine the mineral composition, microstructure, and degree of metamorphism of metamorphic rock types. In the context of reservoir characterization, petrographic analysis, along with digital rock analysis techniques, can be used to study the rock properties and pore structure, and to predict properties such as porosity and permeability.
What are the architectural in the Stone Age?5 answersArchitectural developments in the Stone Age can be observed through various periods and regions. In the Near East, the transition to sedentism during the terminal Pleistocene and early Holocene periods led to significant changes in architectural remains, reflecting the growth of technological know-how and the needs of human groups. Excavations at the site of Nemrik in northern Iraq revealed a course of development in house architecture, from simple hut-like structures to more complex mud-brick houses with unique roof-supporting pillars. In the southern Levant, the Middle and Late Bronze Ages saw the emergence of monumental architecture such as palaces and temples. Chinese historic buildings also form a unique system in design and construction, with high historical, cultural, and artistic value, playing a significant role in world architectural history. These examples highlight the diverse architectural developments during the Stone Age, influenced by technological progress, societal changes, and cultural contexts.