Search or ask a question

What's the problem of Death penalty?

Sociology of punishment

Capital (economics)

Deterrence (legal)

Best insight from top research papers

The death penalty presents various problems, including issues of cost, racial bias, inadequate legal representation, and uncertainties in execution. The cost of death penalty cases is significantly higher than life imprisonment, leading to financial burdens on states . Furthermore, racial bias and inadequate legal representation plague capital trials, impacting the fairness of sentencing . Execution uncertainties arise due to public opinion, unclear regulations post-clemency rejection, and hesitancy in carrying out death sentences . Additionally, the lack of a clear moral justification for punishment methods like deterrence and retribution further complicates the ethical dilemma surrounding the death penalty . Despite its historical roots, the death penalty's application must align with human rights principles and legal regulations to ensure justifiable use .

Answers from top 5 papers

PDF

Open Access

More filters

Papers (5)	Insight
Book Chapter•DOI The Problem of Punishment Whitley R. P. Kaufman 01 Jan 2012 49 Citations	Punishment's purpose and justification, including the death penalty, lack clarity and moral grounding, leading to ethical dilemmas and calls for abolition based on moral principles.
Open access•DOI The Problems of Legal Protection for the Right to Life of Death Penalty Defendants in Indonesia Derry Angling Kesuma 11 Jun 2021 1 Citations	The problem of the death penalty lies in the legal protection for the right to life of defendants, where the state can infringe on human rights while justifying it for societal defense.
Journal Article•DOI Supreme failures (reviewing Most Deserving of Death? An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Death Penalty Jurisprudence, by Kenneth Williams (Ashgate 2012)) Russell D. Covey 01 Feb 2014-Crime Law and Social Change 2 Citations	The issues with the death penalty in the United States include incompetent legal representation, racial bias, inadequate protection for the mentally ill, and wrongful convictions leading to executions of innocent individuals.
Open access PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI HUKUMAN MATI DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA (Upaya Pencarian Kepastian Hukum) Ihwan Zaini, Jurnal Mahasiswa S - Show less +1 more 25 Apr 2013 2 Citations	The problem of the death penalty includes uncertainty in execution due to public opinion influence, unclear regulations post-clemency rejection, and hesitancy in carrying out executions.
Journal Article•DOI Valuing the Death Penalty Brandon Wilson 16 Feb 2019-Social Science Research Network 1 Citations	The problems of the death penalty include lack of oversight, high costs, and misuse. The paper suggests capping state spending on the death penalty to address these issues effectively.

My columns

Related Questions

Why Death penalty should be legalized?4 answersThe death penalty should be legalized because it serves as a deterrent to crime and provides justice for victims and their families. Studies have shown that the threat of capital punishment can deter potential offenders from committing heinous crimes. Additionally, the death penalty ensures that those who have committed the most serious crimes receive appropriate punishment, bringing a sense of closure and justice to the victims and their families. It also acts as a form of retribution, allowing society to express its condemnation of the most egregious offenses. Furthermore, the death penalty can help maintain public safety by permanently removing dangerous individuals from society. Overall, legalizing the death penalty can help deter crime, provide justice, and protect society from the most dangerous criminals.

Is the death penalty a violation of human rights?4 answersThe death penalty is considered a violation of human rights. It is argued that capital punishment infringes on fundamental human rights, such as the right to life, freedom from torture and cruelty, and the right to be treated in a non-arbitrary and non-discriminatory manner. However, there is a debate regarding the application of the death penalty to convicted terrorists. While some argue that it is a violation of human rights, others contend that it can be passed constitutionally if basic rights are fulfilled. In countries like Indonesia, where the death penalty is still applied, there are concerns about its compatibility with human rights, and the implementation of restorative justice is suggested as a solution to avoid human rights violations. Overall, the death penalty is seen as a complex issue that raises questions about its compatibility with human rights standards.

Why death penalty should be a thing?5 answersThe death penalty should be a thing because it serves as a deterrent to crime and provides justice for the victims and their families. It sends a strong message that society will not tolerate heinous crimes and helps maintain law and order. Additionally, it can save taxpayers' money by eliminating the need to house and care for dangerous criminals for life.However, it is important to ensure that the death penalty is applied fairly and without bias, as there have been cases of wrongful convictions and racial disparities in its implementation.It is crucial to have a thorough and rigorous legal process in place to minimize the risk of executing innocent individuals. Overall, the decision to have the death penalty should be carefully considered, taking into account both its potential benefits and the need for safeguards to protect against miscarriages of justice.

Why death penalty is good?5 answersThe death penalty is considered good for several reasons. Firstly, proponents argue that it serves as a strong deterrent and promotes conformity to the law, leading to greater general deterrence and the protection of society. Secondly, it is believed that the death penalty strengthens societal taboos and emphasizes the value of life. Additionally, supporters argue that the death penalty can save innocent lives by removing dangerous individuals from society. Finally, proponents suggest that the death penalty can be a cost-effective measure when implemented systematically as part of rational state policy.

Why is death penalty is good?4 answersThe death penalty is considered good by some because it serves as retribution for the harm inflicted on society by offenders. It is believed that by taking away the lives of murderers, it prevents them from committing further crimes and makes society safer. Additionally, the death penalty is seen as a deterrent, as the fear of execution may discourage potential criminals from committing heinous crimes. Some argue that the punishment should fit the crime, and for particularly heinous murders, capital punishment is seen as the only appropriate penalty. Furthermore, there is a perception that the death penalty has a deterrent value and is equivalent to the concept of "an eye for an eye".

Why death penalty is bad?4 answersThe death penalty is considered bad for several reasons. Firstly, it is argued that the death penalty violates one's inalienable right to life and is therefore a cruel and unusual punishment. Additionally, the death penalty has been criticized for its discriminatory practices, ambiguous judicial directives, and undeniable miscarriages of justice. Furthermore, the death penalty is seen as problematic due to a lack of oversight, extreme costs, and rampant misuse. It is also argued that the death penalty is a product of a desire to eliminate the uncertainty of when one will die, which goes against the fundamental nature of our finite existence. Overall, these factors contribute to the belief that the death penalty is a flawed and problematic practice.

See what other people are reading

What is the role of BCCSA in South Africa broadcasting industry?

The Broadcasting Complaints Commission of South Africa (BCCSA) plays a crucial role in the South African broadcasting industry. It is responsible for considering complaints related to hate speech and infringement of dignity in the media, providing guidelines for audience members to formulate valid complaints and assisting broadcasters in selecting appropriate material for broadcasts. The BCCSA's involvement highlights the importance of addressing issues of hate speech and dignity in media content, ensuring that broadcasting standards are upheld and promoting responsible broadcasting practices in South Africa. By clarifying concepts, analyzing complaints, and establishing guidelines, the BCCSA contributes to maintaining ethical standards and fostering a respectful and inclusive media environment in the country.What should be considered by a university when entering into a joint venture?

When a university considers entering into a joint venture, several factors should be taken into account. Firstly, universities can significantly contribute to research joint ventures by providing higher marginal value and lower appropriability problems to larger ventures, potentially leading to increased size and success of the joint venture. Secondly, joint ventures can offer universities opportunities to leverage their expertise in various fields, such as in the development of knowledge-based systems for medical review, which can be a cost-effective alternative to other consulting options. Additionally, successful joint ventures can result in increased external gift resources to support various university initiatives like endowed professorships, research capabilities, scholarships, and faculty development, as demonstrated by the University of New Orleans' PARTNERSHIPS 2000 CAMPAIGN.What are the externalities of immigration?

Immigration generates various externalities, as evidenced by research. Firstly, the presence of immigrants does not significantly impact welfare spending in the United States, possibly due to conflicting voter models or other factors. Secondly, the average education level of ethnic groups in a region influences the educational opportunities of second-generation immigrants, with higher education levels leading to increased attendance at better schools. Additionally, the movement of inventors across borders results in unintended knowledge flows, benefiting both the inventor's new country and the firm that lost the inventor, showcasing the concept of National Learning by Immigration and Firm Learning from the Diaspora. These findings highlight the multifaceted nature of externalities associated with immigration.What factors influence the choice of capital structure for a company?

The choice of capital structure for a company is influenced by various factors. Internal factors like profitability, firm size, and asset structure, along with external factors such as GDP growth rate, corporate tax, and interest rates play crucial roles. Additionally, factors like liquidity, business risk, and state shareholding also impact capital structure decisions. Studies have shown that firm growth, firm performance, and depreciation tax shield are significant determinants of capital structure choice in specific industries like energy. Moreover, the theory of pecking order and the theory of representative cost are fundamental frameworks used by financial managers to establish sound capital structures for businesses. Overall, a company's capital structure is a complex interplay of internal and external factors that need to be carefully considered for optimal financial decision-making.What are the Interests of poor Countries in globalized development?

Poor countries in globalized development aim to overcome barriers like population growth, resource deficiencies, and low productivity by exporting primary goods for revenue, seeking capital goods. However, price fluctuations in primary goods hinder their progress. Globalization offers growth opportunities but poses challenges, potentially benefiting coastal regions more than inland areas. The International Monetary Fund defines globalization as increased economic interdependence through cross-border transactions and technology diffusion. Disparities between rich and poor nations prompt debates on global responsibilities, with communitarians arguing for charity-based aid and cosmopolitans advocating for addressing inequality through transnational assistance. Ultimately, the interests of poor countries lie in leveraging globalization for sustainable development while ensuring fair distribution of benefits.What is adultery?

Adultery, defined as sexual involvement outside of marriage, is a complex phenomenon influenced by psychological, social, economic, and biological factors. It is a violation of the commitment to sexual fidelity within marriage and extends to various types of relationships beyond just marital ones. Adultery is perceived as a great sin in society, leading to moral condemnation and potential consequences like divorce. The act of adultery is considered objectionable on religious, moral, and ethical grounds, impacting the perceived purity of children and inheritance within a marriage. Furthermore, the patriarchal symbolic order plays a significant role in shaping norms around adultery, often leading to unequal treatment of women within legal frameworks.What are the restrictions on those with mental illness with firarms?

Restrictions on individuals with mental illness regarding firearms ownership vary across states. Federal law permanently prohibits gun possession for those involuntarily hospitalized for psychiatric reasons. California offers pathways for state-level firearm prohibition for individuals with mental illness, including through the "5150" process. However, the effectiveness of such laws in enhancing public safety is limited, as only a small percentage of violent acts involve serious mental illness, and these laws may deter individuals from seeking treatment. Research suggests that focusing solely on restricting firearm access for individuals with serious mental illness may not significantly impact overall rates of firearm-related homicides. To enhance safety, legal changes like banning large ammunition magazines, improving background checks, and closing purchasing loopholes have been proposed.How german dual apprenticeship was created?

The German Dual Apprenticeship system, a hallmark of vocational education and training, has its roots deeply embedded in the country's historical and socio-economic fabric. This system, characterized by its combination of in-firm training and college-based education, reflects a long-standing tradition of vocational training in Germany. Its creation was influenced by the need to provide a highly skilled workforce, capable of meeting the demands of an industrializing nation. Over the years, the system has evolved, responding to various economic and social challenges while maintaining its core structure. The Dual System's legal foundation was laid with the Vocational Education Law (Berufsbildungsgesetz - BBiG) first passed in 1969, which was later revised to accommodate the reunification of Germany. This legal framework underscores the system's significance in German public life and its adaptability to changing socio-economic conditions. The system's resilience and capacity to adapt were further tested and proven during periods of heavy criticism and calls for reform in the late 1960s and throughout the 1970s. Despite these challenges, no far-reaching reforms took place, largely due to the system's ability to meet the quantitative and qualitative demands of vocational training. The Dual System's modernization efforts have been ongoing, reflecting Germany's commitment to maintaining its practices while also embracing necessary reforms. These reforms have been driven by a recognition of the changing nature of apprenticeships and the evolving needs of both employers and apprentices. Moreover, the system's unique political economy, characterized by corporatist governance, has played a crucial role in its development and sustainability. Internationally, the German Dual Apprenticeship system has garnered attention for its effectiveness in vocational training. Comparisons with vocational education systems in other developed countries highlight the Dual System's distinctive approach to combining workplace training with formal education. This has sparked discussions about the transferability of the Dual System to different cultural and economic contexts, as seen in attempts by German manufacturers to implement dual training structures abroad. In summary, the creation and evolution of the German Dual Apprenticeship system are the results of historical developments, legal frameworks, and continuous adaptation to socio-economic challenges. Its success lies in its ability to provide comprehensive vocational education and training, balancing the needs of the economy with the aspirations of young people.How of firms in this market?

Firms in the market exhibit various responses to competition and changing environments. They are seen as contracts between human and non-human capital, often leaving some rights and obligations undefined initially. In today's global markets, firms must be flexible and responsive to marketplace demands due to increasing turbulence and uncertainty. Research shows that firms quickly adapt to changes in conditions, such as tax modifications, competition, innovation, and external pressures, developing theoretical models to interpret their responses. The organization of production within firms differs significantly from the market's invisible hand, as firms have visible directives set by management, coordinating production consciously towards unified objectives. Applying market principles internally within firms could bring benefits but would require a fundamental re-evaluation of labor market regulations.What is the role of BCCSA, in south Africa broadcasting industry?

The Broadcasting Complaints Commission of South Africa (BCCSA) plays a crucial role in the South African broadcasting industry by addressing complaints related to hate speech, infringement of dignity, and content suitability. As a public broadcaster, the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) is mandated to promote transparency, accountability, and provide a wide range of programming to the public. The BCCSA's consideration of complaints and the SABC's role in promoting transparency intersect in ensuring ethical broadcasting practices and adherence to regulatory standards. The regulatory framework for the broadcasting industry in South Africa has evolved post-democracy, with judicial interpretations shaping broadcasting jurisprudence and administrative law principles applied in licensing decisions. Public Service Broadcasters, including the SABC, are obligated to manage their archives effectively to safeguard information and ensure long-term preservation through digitization strategies.What are some hot topics regarding finance, taxes and capital markets?

Hot topics in finance, taxes, and capital markets include the strategic use of taxes on capital in international competition, the challenges of coordinating national tax policies in a global economy, the need for a comprehensive approach to taxing the financial sector post-financial crisis, the design of rational taxation systems for the financial sector in specific countries like the Czech Republic, and the influence of taxes on various aspects of finance such as individual investor behavior, portfolio theory, capital market equilibrium, and firm capital structure choices. These topics highlight the complexities and interconnections between taxation, financial regulation, and capital markets, emphasizing the importance of addressing these issues in a coherent and strategic manner.