Why Euopean beech has more nutrients compared to conifer like Douglas fir?
Best insight from top research papers
European beech (Fagus sylvatica) tends to have more nutrients compared to conifers like Douglas fir due to differences in soil chemistry and nutrient uptake. Research indicates that pure beech stands exhibit higher base saturation values in the soil compared to spruce and Douglas fir stands . Additionally, when beech is mixed with Douglas fir, the soil pH and base saturation are higher than in pure conifer stands, especially on nutrient-poor sandy soils . This suggests that the presence of beech, either pure or in mixture with Douglas fir, helps maintain higher levels of nutrients in the soil, contributing to the enhanced nutrient content observed in European beech compared to conifers like Douglas fir.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
Papers (5) | Insight |
---|---|
12 Citations | European beech has more nutrients compared to conifers like Douglas fir due to higher base saturation (BS) levels, leading to enriched soil conditions favorable for nutrient availability. |
Not addressed in the paper. | |
European beech has more nutrients compared to conifers like Douglas fir due to its dominant deciduous tree characteristics, leading to higher nutrient concentrations in the organic layer. | |
1 Citations | Nutrient capacity modulated by tree diversity, composition, and environmental factors influences European beech having more nutrients than conifers like Douglas fir in certain conditions. |
1 Citations | European beech has more nutrients than conifers like Douglas fir due to higher base saturation, pH levels, and cation stocks, making it a better option for forest soil chemistry. |
Related Questions
How does historical disturbance affect tree size distribution in beech primary forest in europe?5 answersHistorical disturbances play a significant role in shaping tree size distribution in beech primary forests in Europe. Studies reveal that these forests have experienced various disturbance regimes, ranging from low to high severity events, impacting the canopy area differently. Human interventions, such as traditional management practices like coppicing, have altered the genetic composition of beech populations, leading to changes in spatial genetic structuring. Dendrochronological analyses have shown fluctuations in tree growth patterns in response to climate change, with unexpected growth increases contradicting previous dependencies on summer soil moisture. Furthermore, differences in forest structure and biodiversity between spruce- and beech-dominated forests highlight the influence of historical disturbances on tree size distribution and ecosystem dynamics. Overall, historical disturbances have shaped the tree size distribution in beech primary forests, impacting their structure and genetic diversity.
What is the average quantity of Carbon in stem wood and bark of european beech per hectare?5 answersThe average quantity of carbon in stem wood and bark of European beech per hectare is approximately 370.2 tons. This value was determined through quantification methods utilizing dendrometric techniques and Field-Map technology in European beech forest stands in the Chřiby uplands in the Czech Republic. Additionally, the study on soil organic carbon concentration (SOCC) in primeval European beech forests across various regions found significant variations in SOCC values, ranging from 12.5 g kg−1 to 154.8 g kg−1, influenced by site conditions and parent materials. Furthermore, research on tree functioning under extreme events highlighted the impact of a late frost event on reducing carbon fixed in stem biomass by 80% in a Mediterranean beech forest, leading to a net emission of 0.468 Mg C ha−1 yr−1.
How does nutritional content in plant biomass differs among plant organs european forest?5 answersNutritional content in plant biomass varies among plant organs in European forests. Macronutrient concentrations in foliar and stem wood biomass were found to be more dependent on species rather than site, with differences observed between deciduous and coniferous species. Micronutrient concentrations in foliage and stemwood differed significantly among European tree species, highlighting the importance of species-related differences in microelement nutrition. Allometric methods proved reliable for estimating above-ground biomass and nutrient content of woody species, emphasizing the need for local nutrient concentration values over literature-derived values. Additionally, the partitioning of aboveground biomass and nutrient content between oak and hornbeam trees in forest stands on acid soils was quantified, showing distinct nutrient concentration patterns within and between tree species.
What is the reason for increased nutrient uptake in hardwood cuttings?5 answersIncreased nutrient uptake in hardwood cuttings is primarily influenced by the nutrient supply to the stock plants and the morphological characteristics of the cuttings themselves. Increasing the nutrient supply to stock plants leads to higher growth rates and increased production of adventitious roots in subsequently harvested cuttings. The ability of a cutting to retain its leaf during propagation, the length of the cutting, the length of the new shoot, total leaf area, and within-shoot position are all significant factors associated with rooting and nutrient uptake in hardwood cuttings. These morphological and physiological traits play a more significant role in genetic variation in rooting potential than genetic variation in cell differentiation or root initiation. Therefore, optimizing the nutrient supply to stock plants and selecting cuttings with favorable morphological characteristics can enhance nutrient uptake and rooting success in hardwood cuttings.
Douglas fir european beech litter trap5 answersDouglas fir and European beech litterfall production and leaf area index (LAI) were studied in a mixed beech-silver fir virgin forest in the Southern Carpathian Mountains. Annual litter productivity ranged from 1.8 to 8.3 t ha−1, with beech leaves comprising 66% of the litter composition. The total foliar dry mass increased with the proportion of beeches and decreased with median stand age. The LAI, calculated directly using litter traps, had a mean value of 5.06 m2 m−2, while the LAI estimated indirectly using hemispherical photographs had a mean value of 3.65. There was no significant relation between the LAIs and any stand or environmental variables. The study suggests that annual foliar dry mass is more closely related to stand characteristics than LAI in complex forests like the beech-silver fir mixed forest.
What is the importance of glacier melt as a water source for Douglas firs?5 answersGlacier melt is an important source of water for Douglas firs. The meltwater from snow and ice in mountainous catchments acts as a natural reservoir, storing precipitation during winter and releasing it in spring and summer. In glacier-fed rivers, melting of glacier ice sustains streamflow during dry periods, especially during drought years. The contribution of glacier melt to basin water supply can be significant, with historical values reaching up to 79% at upland water management locations. However, the availability of glacier meltwater is vulnerable to glacier recession caused by rising temperatures. Changes in climate are expected to lead to reductions in dry season discharge sourced from glacier melt, impacting water availability for Douglas firs and other ecosystems. Therefore, understanding the dynamics of glacier melt and its relationship to water availability is crucial for managing the water needs of Douglas firs and other dependent systems.