Showing papers on "Anterior accessory saphenous vein published in 2017"

Long-segment hypoplasia of great saphenous vein with posterior accessory saphenous vein as a connecting vein: a case report.

Abstract: Aplasia or hypoplasia of great saphenous vein (GSV) is relatively common. Most of them are segmental and localized around the knee. They rarely extend to the inguinal area, yet in case of this, the anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV) is the most common connecting vein. We report a case of a 22-year-old male who underwent surgery for pain and heaviness of the right calf. He had the hypoplasia of right GSV extended from below the popliteal crease to near the saphenofemoral junction with posterior ASV (PASV) as a connecting vein. Significant reflux was observed in PASV and GSV which are proximal to PASV. High ligation and stripping was performed, and symptoms improved after surgery. In this report, the author discussed a rare case of long-segment hypoplasia of GSV with PASV as a connecting vein.

The E point: a new echographic great saphenous identification sign in specific anatomical variants and applications.

Abstract: Objective To describe a new ultrasound marker of the Great Saphenous Vein at the groin. Method An ultrasound marker of the Great Saphenous Vein was identified as follows: the Great Saphenous Vein was tracked in cross-sectionally starting from the Sapheno Femoral Junction and optimally visualized where it crosses the Adductor Longus muscle, i.e., 3-5 cm below the junction. This marker, corresponding to a very superficial position of Great Saphenous Vein, was named "E Point," where E means easy to find. The search for the E point was performed on 230 limbs of 126 subjects with or without chronic venous insufficiency (training population) and the method was validated in 58 subjects (testing population). Results The E point was successfully recorded in 128/144 (89%) pathologic and in 85/86 (99%) healthy limbs. Being free from other structures, at the E point the Great Saphenous Vein was always easily calibrated. In 17 cases, the E point could not be identified due to an hypoplasic Great Saphenous Vein; in such instances, the Anterior Accessory Saphenous Vein was well evident and substituted for the Great Saphenous Vein as the main draining vein at the groin. Conclusion The E point identifies the Great Saphenous Vein in healthy and varicose patients. Failure to identify the E point indicates Anterior Accessory Saphenous Vein dominance over a hypoplasic Great Saphenous Vein.

A pilot study of venous duplex ultrasound parameters in healthy children.

Abstract: Objective The spectrum of chronic venous disease (CVD) in adults is well documented, whereas there is a paucity of data published commenting on pediatric CVD. We previously identified that there is often venous reflux present in cases of pediatric lower extremity edema despite an alternative confirmed diagnosis. To further assess the clinical significance of this venous reflux, this study aimed to elicit venous parameters in healthy pediatric controls. Methods Healthy pediatric volunteers aged 5 to 17 years were recruited for venous reflux study. A comprehensive venous reflux study was performed with the patient standing. Vein diameter, patterns of valvular reflux, and accessory venous anatomy were examined in the deep and superficial venous systems. Results Eighteen children including 10 boys and 8 girls were studied. Five volunteers were aged 5 to 8 years, six volunteers were aged 9 to 12 years, and seven volunteers were aged 13 to 17 years. Great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter at the saphenofemoral junction significantly increased with age. Deep vein valve closure time (VCT) did not differ significantly between groups, whereas GSV VCT was significantly higher in the 9- to 12-year age group. Incidental venous insufficiency was identified in 60% of children aged 5 to 8 years (n = 3), 50% of children aged 9 to 12 years (n = 3), and 57% of children aged 13 to 17 years (n = 4). All superficial venous reflux was confined to the GSV; there were no cases of isolated deep venous reflux. Reflux was identified at multiple GSV stations in 60% of children. There was no significant difference in incompetent GSV VCT in comparing children with and without deep venous reflux. Accessory superficial veins were identified in 20% of children aged 5 to 8 years (n = 1), 50% of children aged 9 to 12 years (n = 3), and 43% of children aged 13 to 17 years (n = 3). The presence of an accessory saphenous vein was not associated with deep venous reflux in any patient, and only 29% of those with accessory saphenous venous anatomy had evidence of superficial venous (GSV) reflux. Conclusions The GSV continues to grow in diameter through the teenage years. Incidental valvular incompetence and GSV reflux are common. The presence of accessory saphenous veins is similarly common and not associated with venous reflux. The clinical significance and natural history of this incidental venous reflux remain unclear. Future research should determine whether these changes seen in the pediatric age group lead to CVD during later years of life.