scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Structure and agency published in 1989"


01 Jun 1989
TL;DR: In this paper, a theory of structure that restores human agency to social actors, builds the possibility of change into the concept of structure, and overcomes the divide between semiotic and materialist vision of structure is presented.
Abstract: "Structure" is one of the most important, elusive, and undertheorized concepts in the social sciences. Setting out from a critique and reformulation of Anthony Giddens's notion of the duality of structure and Pierre Boundieu's notion of habitus, this article attempts to develop a theory of structure that restores human agency to social actors, builds the possibility of change into the concept of structure, and overcomes the divide between semiotic and materialist vision of structure.

109 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider the changing nature of political relationships between educational management agencies in England and Wales during the 1940s and 1980s, within the areas of scientific, technical and vocational education and training, and within the school system, and suggest that the general agreement among writers that there has been a marked shift towards the centralisation of power masks a number of important problems concerning the processes underlying this development.
Abstract: The article considers the changing nature of political relationships between educational management agencies in England and Wales during the 1940s and 1980s, within the areas of scientific, technical and vocational education and training, and within the school system. It suggests that the general agreement among writers that there has been a marked shift towards the centralisation of power masks a number of important problems concerning the processes underlying this development. In particular, the assumptions by many researchers that increased government control was the consequence of a cumulative process generated by actions intended to achieve this outcome seems to be misconceived. The occasions of greater central control should be seen more as ‘drifts towards centralisation’ that were both transformative and the outcome of developments in which unintended consequences played a significant part. The dynamic relationships between structure and agency which underlie such processes can be illumina...

2 citations