scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Vaccine trial published in 1967"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The immunogenic potency of GMKC vaccine was clearly defined by the complete absence of viremia in the vaccinated monkeys and no appreciable stimulation of N, complement-fixation, or hemagglutination-inhibition antibody subsequent to challenge.
Abstract: Summary The comparative immunogenicities of experimental formalin-inactivated chikungunya (CHIK) vaccines prepared in chick-embryo (CE), suckling-mouse-brain (SMB), and green-monkey kidney-cell (GMKC) tissue culture with the CHIK 168 virus have been described. Tests of protection in mice revealed that CE vaccine was markedly inferior to either SMB or GMKC vaccine. Both SMB and GMKC vaccine were highly effective in protecting mice against an intracerebral challenge. However, the potentially encephalitogenic properties of SMB vaccines seriously limit their use in practice, so further evaluation of this vaccine was not now pursued. Results of plaque-inhibition tests revealed that GMKC vaccine elicited significant levels of serum-neutralization (N) antibody in mice to heterologous African E-103, Asian BAH-306, and Indian C-266 strains as well as the homologous 168 strain of CHIK virus. To correlate these findings with actual protection a vaccine trial was performed in rhesus monkeys, with these strains of the CHIK virus in the challenge procedure. After three doses of GMKC vaccine, high levels of N antibody developed in monkeys, and in most instances, CF and HI antibody were present in low titers to the challenge viruses. The immunogenic potency of GMKC vaccine was clearly defined by the complete absence of viremia in the vaccinated monkeys and no appreciable stimulation of N, complement-fixation, or hemagglutination-inhibition antibody subsequent to challenge. In contrast, the control monkeys, with one exception, had viremia, and responded with high levels of N, CF, and HI antibody after challenge.

42 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results of a vaccine trial in young infants employing three parainfluenza monovalent vaccines administered simultaneously are described, revealing promising results in infants between 3 and 14 months of age.
Abstract: THE NEED for and the present status of parainfluenza virus vaccines have been described in published reports. 1 With one exception, the antigens have been administered as monovalent vaccines and antibody responses measured. 1 The desired goal of respiratory virus immunization is the administration of a multivalent preparation containing the principal agents producing respiratory illness in infants and children. 2 This report details the results of a vaccine trial in young infants employing three parainfluenza monovalent vaccines administered simultaneously. Materials and Methods Population. —An established well-baby clinic located at General Rose Memorial Hospital in Denver was chosen for the vaccine trial. All infants were born at this hospital and admitted to the Well-Baby Clinic at 6 weeks of age. Candidates for the vaccine program were healthy infants between 3 and 14 months of age, whose parents volunteered them for the study and signed a written consent for participation after full

7 citations