Adam P. Warren

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a qualitative case study investigating the experiences and opinions of students and staff from outside the European Economic Area (EEA), based at universities in London and the Midlands.

TL;DR: This article analyzed empirical data from a major Economic and Social Research Council-funded research project designed to provide the first systematic evidence about the ways in which local partnerships working in sensitive policy fields in England and Scotland attempt to strike settlements between sharing and confidentiality and discusses the impact of national government's attempts to increase formal regulation of their information-sharing practices.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the biopolitics of public health in the UK through an in-depth empirical analysis of the representation of H1N1 in UK national and regional newspapers, uncover new discourses relating to the significance of the airport as a site for control and the ethics of the treatment of the traveller as a potential transmitter of disease.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors used data from the largest empirical study of local information-sharing yet undertaken to examine four policy sectors where multi-agency working has come to the fore, and they showed that variations in their information sharing and confidentiality practices can be explained by neo-Durkheimian institutional theory and uses insights from this theory to argue that current policy tools which emphasize formal regulation are unlikely to lead to consistent and acceptable outcomes, not least because of unresolved conflicts in values and aims.

TL;DR: An in-depth empirical analysis of the representation of H1N1 in UK national and regional newspapers uncovers new discourses relating to the significance of the airport as a site for control and the ethics of the treatment of the traveller as a potential transmitter of disease.