A
Aditya Bharadwaj
Researcher at Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies
Publications - 50
Citations - 685
Aditya Bharadwaj is an academic researcher from Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Internal medicine. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 29 publications receiving 614 citations. Previous affiliations of Aditya Bharadwaj include Cardiff University & University of Edinburgh.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Why adoption is not an option in India: the visibility of infertility, the secrecy of donor insemination, and other cultural complexities
TL;DR: It is argued that secrecy is born out of a need to obfuscate a "public and visible" violation of a culturally priced ideal that views an intimate connection between the "married body" and the progeny as inextricably tied to the conjugal bond.
Book
Risky Relations: Family, Kinship and the New Genetics
TL;DR: This book presents a meta-ethics framework for evaluating the impact of human interaction with each other in the context of a knowledge-based society.
Book
Local Cells, Global Science: The Rise of Embryonic Stem Cell Research in India
Aditya Bharadwaj,Peter Glasner +1 more
TL;DR: This chapter discusses complexities in Cross-Cultural Standardization, Bioethics and Regulatory Protocols, and some Concluding Considerations about Local Cells, Global Science.
Journal ArticleDOI
Sacred conceptions: clinical theodicies, uncertain science, and technologies of procreation in India.
TL;DR: It is argued that the rapid transfer of assisted conception technologies to India is not restricted merely to the modalities of offering potential biomedical resolution of infertility but includes, more crucially, how clinicians and infertile consumers assimilate the “Western technoscience” of conception.
Journal ArticleDOI
Public perceptions of gamete donation: a research review
TL;DR: There is a strong case for social scientific research to attempt to capture the perceptions of a wider range of people who are rarely included in formal public consultations and often similarly excluded from research studies.