Anion recognition chemistry has grown from its beginnings in the late 1960s with positively charged ammonium cryptand receptors for halide binding to, at the end of the millennium, a plethora of charged and neutral, cyclic and acyclic, inorganic and organic supramolecular host systems for the selective complexation, detection, and separation of anionic guest species. Solvation effects and pH values have been shown to play crucial roles in the overall anion recognition process. More recent developments include exciting advances in anion-templated syntheses and directed self-assembly, ion-pair recognition, and the function of anions in supramolecular catalysis.

Anion Recognition and Sensing: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives

In contrast to the very large number of special methods applicable to syntheses in the heterocyclic series, relatively few general methods are available. The 1,3-dipolar addition offers a remarkably wide range of utility in the synthesis of five-membered heterocycles. Here the “1,3-dipole”, which can only be represented by zwitterionic octet resonance structures, combines in a cycloaddition with a multiple bond system – the “dipolarophile” – to form an uncharged five-membered ring. Although numerous individual examples of this reaction were known, some even back in the nineteenth century, fruitful development of this synthetic principle has been achieved only in recent years.

1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions. Past and Future†

When a molecule absorbs a photon of appropriate energy, a chain of photophysical events ensues, such as internal conversion or vibrational relaxation (loss of energy in the absence of light emission), fluorescence, intersystem crossing (from singlet state to a triplet state) and phosphorescence, as shown in the Jablonski diagram for organic molecules (Fig. 1). Each of the processes occurs with a certain probability, characterized by decay rate constants (k). It can be shown that the average length of time τ for the set of molecules to decay from one state to another is reciprocally proportional to the rate of decay: τ = 1/k. This average length of time is called the mean lifetime, or simply lifetime. It can also be shown that the lifetime of a photophysical process is the time required by a population of N electronically excited molecules to be reduced by a factor of e. Correspondingly, the fluorescence lifetime is the time required by a population of excited fluorophores to decrease exponentially to N/e via the loss of energy through fluorescence and other non-radiative processes. The lifetime of photophycal processes vary significantly from tens of femotoseconds for internal conversion1,2 to nanoseconds for fluorescence and microseconds or seconds for phosphorescence.1






Open in a separate window


Figure 1


Jablonski diagram and a timescale of photophysical processes for organic molecules.

/pdf/fluorescence-lifetime-measurements-and-biological-imaging-xfalzh4w7e.pdf

Fluorescence Lifetime Measurements and Biological Imaging

Complete Field Guide to Asymmetric BINOL-Phosphate Derived Brønsted Acid and Metal Catalysis: History and Classification by Mode of Activation; Brønsted Acidity, Hydrogen Bonding, Ion Pairing, and Metal Phosphates

Water is the lingua franca of life on our planet and is the solvent of choice for Nature to carry out her syntheses.1 In contrast, our methods of making complex organic molecules have taken us far away from the watery milieu of biosynthesis. Indeed, it is fair to say that most organic reactions commonly used both in academic laboratories and in industry fail in the presence of water or oxygen. As a direct consequence of our attempts to mimick Nature's way of making new chemical bonds, we learned to rely on highly reactive nucleophilic and electrophilic reagents to gain control of the chemical reactivity and to channel chemical reactions down a desired pathway. The requirement for the protection of all protic functional groups, such as alcohols and amines, is another corollary of our reliance on these energetic species. Nevertheless, chemical transformations in aqueous solvents are not new to organic chemists. On the contrary, they have attracted attention of scientists for many years: the first use of water for an organic reaction could be dated back to Wohler's synthesis of urea from ammonium cyanate.2 From a true organic synthesis perspective, the earliest example could be the synthesis of indigo by Baeyer and Drewsen in 1882 (Scheme 1).3 In their synthesis, a suspension of o-nitrobenzaldehyde 1 in aqueous acetone was treated with a solution of sodium hydroxide. The immediate formation of the characteristic blue color of indigo 2 ensued, and the product subsequently precipitated.



Scheme 1



Water possesses many unique physical and chemical properties: large temperature window in which it remains in the liquid state, extensive hydrogen bonding, high heat capacity, large dielectric constant, and optimum oxygen solubility to maintain aquatic life forms. These distinctive properties are the consequence of the unique structure of water.4,5 The structure and properties of water have been studied by scientists representing almost all fields of knowledge, and new theoretical models continue to emerge.6,7 Water is also known to enhance the rates and to affect the selectivity of a wide variety of organic reactions.8,9

In spite of these potential advantages, water is still not commonly used as a sole solvent for organic synthesis, at least in part because most organic compounds do not dissolve in water to a significant extent, and solubility is generally considered a prerequisite for reactivity: “corpora non agunt nisi soluta” (substances do not react unless dissolved). Consequently, in the many examples of “aqueous reactions” organic co-solvents are employed in order to increase the solubility of organic reactants in water.9,10 Alternatively, hydrophilicity of the reactants is increased by the introduction of polar functional groups, again to make the resulting compound at least partially water soluble.11 However, these manipulations tend to diminish and even negate the advantages of low cost, simplicity of reaction conditions, ease of workup, and product isolation that water has over traditional solvents. Therefore, the currently burgeoning field of organic synthesis in aqueous media encompasses a large family of reactions. The solubility of reacting species and products can range from complete to partial to practically none, so that reaction mixtures can be both homogeneous and heterogeneous. The amount of water can also range widely, from substoichiometric quantities to a large volume in which the reactants are suspended or dissolved. Several terms have been used in the literature to describe reactions in aqueous millieu. In water, in the presence of water, and on water are commonly found in the recent publications and are often used interchangeably to describe reactions that proceed under very different conditions.12,13 There is also a growing number of examples micellar catalysis in the presence of non-ionic surfactants, such as Triton X-100 and PTS (a tocopherol-based amphiphile).14-18

In this review, we attempt to survey organic transformations that benefit from being performed on water under the conditions defined by Sharpless and co-workers: when insoluble reactant(s) are stirred in aqueous emulsions or suspensions without the addition of any organic co-solvents. In many cases, it is impossible to ascertain whether the reaction is occuring in or on water, but as long as the reaction mixture remains heterogeneous and the overall process appears to benefit from it (either in terms of increased reaction rate or enhanced selectivity), it qualifies.

The ‘on water’ moniker reflects the defining attribute of these reactions: the lack of solubility of the reactant(s) in water. A considerable rate acceleration is often observed in reactions carried out under these conditions over those in organic solvents.19 Furthermore, in many cases a significant rate increase of on water reactions over reactions carried out neat indicates that rate acceleration is not merely a consequence of increased concentration of the reacting species. Naturally, the degree of on water acceleration varies between different reaction classes, and even when it is modest, there are other advantages to carrying out reactions in this manner. Firstly, water is an excellent heat sink due to its large heat capacity, making exothermic processes safer and more selective, especially when they are carried out on large scale. Secondly, reactions of water-insoluble substrates usually lead to the formation of water-insoluble products. In such cases, product isolation simply involves filtration of solid products (or phase separation in case of liquids). Finally, the growing list of examples wherein reactions performed on water are not only faster but also more selective (whether chemo-, regio-, or enantio-) underscores the significant potential for process intensification for reactions performed on water.

Although claims of the ecological advantages and “greenness” of water are almost invariably found in the opening paragraphs of reports describing aqueous reactions, they should be taken with a grain of salt. The low cost, relative abundance, and inherent safety of water notwithstanding, the environmental impact of a process is determined by many factors, such as the efficiency of the reaction in terms of atom economy,20 the nature of solvents used in the reaction workup, the residual concentration of regulated organic compounds and metal catalysts remaining in the aqueous waste, and the costs of its clean up or disposal.21,22 The mere finding that a process performs as well in water as it does in an organic solvent tells us little about its potential environmental impact.

The field of aqueous organic synthesis has been regularly and comprehensively reviewed.9,10,23-27 In addition, recent reviews focusing on microwave assisted organic synthesis in water,28 reactions in near-critical water,29 and biocatalysis in water30 have been published. Accordingly, these topics are not covered in the present review.

Adolf Baeyer

Papers

Einwirkung des Caro'schen Reagens auf Ketone

Ueber ein Condensationsproduct von Pyrrol mit Aceton

Ueber die Einwirkung des Caro'schen Reagens auf Ketone

Ueber eine neue Klasse von Farbstoffen

Dibenzalaceton und Triphenylmethan