Freedom of design, mass customisation, waste minimisation and the ability to manufacture complex structures, as well as fast prototyping, are the main benefits of additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing. A comprehensive review of the main 3D printing methods, materials and their development in trending applications was carried out. In particular, the revolutionary applications of AM in biomedical, aerospace, buildings and protective structures were discussed. The current state of materials development, including metal alloys, polymer composites, ceramics and concrete, was presented. In addition, this paper discussed the main processing challenges with void formation, anisotropic behaviour, the limitation of computer design and layer-by-layer appearance. Overall, this paper gives an overview of 3D printing, including a survey on its benefits and drawbacks as a benchmark for future research and development.

Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges

The past few decades have seen substantial growth in Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies. However, this growth has mainly been process-driven. The evolution of engineering design to take advantage of the possibilities afforded by AM and to manage the constraints associated with the technology has lagged behind. This paper presents the major opportunities, constraints, and economic considerations for Design for Additive Manufacturing. It explores issues related to design and redesign for direct and indirect AM production. It also highlights key industrial applications, outlines future challenges, and identifies promising directions for research and the exploitation of AM's full potential in industry.

/pdf/design-for-additive-manufacturing-trends-opportunities-22heccleea.pdf

Design for additive manufacturing: trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints

3D printing of Aluminium alloys: Additive Manufacturing of Aluminium alloys using selective laser melting

Review on titanium and titanium based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications.

Design for manufacture and assembly (DFM) has typically meant that designers should tailor their designs to eliminate manufacturing difficulties and minimize manufacturing, assembly, and logistics costs. However, the capabilities of additive manufacturing technologies provide an opportunity to rethink DFM to take advantage of the unique capabilities of these technologies. As mentioned in Chap. 16, several companies are now using AM technologies for production manufacturing. For example, Siemens, Phonak, Widex, and the other hearing aid manufacturers use selective laser sintering and stereolithography machines to produce hearing aid shells; Align Technology uses stereolithography to fabricate molds for producing clear dental braces (“aligners”); and Boeing and its suppliers use polymer powder bed fusion (PBF) to produce ducts and similar parts for F-17 fighter jets. For hearing aids and dental aligners, AM machines enable manufacturing of tens to hundreds of thousands of parts, where each part is uniquely customized based upon person-specific geometric data. In the case of aircraft components, AM technology enables low-volume manufacturing, easy integration of design changes and, at least as importantly, piece part reductions to greatly simplify product assembly.

Design for Additive Manufacturing

Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures have already been shown to be a versatile source of biomorphic scaffold designs. Therefore, in this work, Ti–6Al–4V Gyroid and Diamond TPMS lattices having an interconnected high porosity of 80–95% and pore sizes in the range of 560–1600 μm and 480–1450 μm respectively were manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM) for bone implants. The manufacturability, microstructure and mechanical properties of the Ti–6Al–4V TPMS lattices were evaluated. Comparison between 3D micro-CT reconstructed models and original CAD models of the Ti–6Al–4V TPMS lattices shows excellent reproduction of the designs. The as-built Ti–6Al–4V struts exhibit the microstructure of columnar grains filled with very fine and orthogonally oriented α′ martensitic laths with the width of 100–300 nm and have the microhardness of 4.01±0.34 GPa. After heat treatment at 680 °C for 4 h, the α′ martensite was converted to a mixture of α and β, in which the α phase being the dominant fraction is present as fine laths with the width of 500–800 nm and separated by a small amount of narrow, interphase regions of dark β phase. Also, the microhardness is decreased to 3.71±0.35 GPa due to the coarsening of the microstructure. The 80–95% porosity TPMS lattices exhibit a comparable porosity with trabecular bone, and the modulus is in the range of 0.12–1.25 GPa and thus can be adjusted to the modulus of trabecular bone. At the same range of porosity of 5–10%, the moduli of cortical bone and of the Ti–6Al–4V TPMS lattices are in a similar range. Therefore, the modulus and porosity of Ti–6Al–4V TPMS lattices can be tailored to the levels of human bones and thus reduce or avoid “stress shielding” and increase longevity of implants. Due to the biomorphic designs, and high interconnected porosity and stiffness comparable to human bones, SLM-made Ti–6Al–4V TPMS lattices can be a promising material for load bearing bone implants.

Ahmed Yussuf Hussein

Papers

Ti–6Al–4V triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting

Design and additive manufacturing of cellular lattice structures

Numerical analysis on the mechanical properties of uniform TPMS

Design of TPMS structures

Application and prospects