scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Alberto Santoro published in 1990"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors measured the three form factors governing the decay of the photoproduction data in Fermilab experiment E691, using the complete decay distribution of the data.
Abstract: We have measured the three form factors governing the decay {ital D}{sup +}{r arrow}{ital {bar K}} {sup *0}{ital e}{sup +}{nu}{sub {ital e}}, observed in Fermilab photoproduction experiment E691, using the complete decay distribution of the data. The results are {ital A}{sub 1}(0)=0.46{plus minus}0.05{plus minus}0.05, {ital A}{sub 2}(0)=0.0{plus minus}0.2{plus minus}0.1, and {ital V}(0)=0.9{plus minus}0.3{plus minus}0.1 for the two axial-vector and the vector form factors, respectively. The {ital {bar K}} {sup *0} mesons have a ratio of longitudinal to transverse polarization of 1.8{sub {minus}0.4}{sup +0.6}{plus minus}0.3. These results are significantly different from values predicted by a number of different models.

67 citations


01 Jan 1990
TL;DR: The proceedings of the topics covered during the fifth Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School as discussed by the authors were summarized in Section 2.1. The first part of the book collects the material devoted to quantum field theory.
Abstract: This book contains the proceedings of the topics covered during the fifth Jorge Andre Swieca Summer School. The first part of the book collects the material devoted to quantum field theory. There were four courses on methods in Field Theory; H. O. Girotti lectured on constrained dynamics, R. Jackiw on the Schrodinger representation in Field Theory, S.-Y. Pi on the application of this representation to quantum fields in a Robertson-Walker spacetime, and L. Vinet on Berry Connections. There were three courses on Conformal Field Theory: I. Todorov focused on the problem of construction and classification of conformal field theories. Lattice models, two-dimensional S matrices and conformal field theory were looked from the unifying perspective of the Yang-Baxter algebras in the lectures given by M. Karowski. Parasupersymmetric quantum mechanics was discussed in the lectures by L. Vinet. Besides those courses, there was an introduction to string field theory given by G. Horowitz. There were also three seminars: F. Schaposnik reported on recent applications of topological methods in field theory, P. Gerbert gave a seminar on three dimensional gravity and V. Kurak talked on two dimensional parafermionic models. The second part of this proceedings is devoted to phenomenology. There were three coursesmore » on Particle Physics: Dan Green lectured on collider physics, E. Predrazzi on strong interactions and G. Cohen-Tanoudji on the use of strings in strong interactions.« less

24 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results on the photoproduction of 10 000 fully reconstructed charmed particles from the 10{sup 8} recorded triggers of Fermilab experiment E691 have been analyzed in the photon-gluon-fusion model.
Abstract: Results on the photoproduction of 10 000 fully reconstructed charmed particles from the ${10}^{8}$ recorded triggers of Fermilab experiment E691 have been analyzed in the photon-gluon-fusion model. We find that the total cross section, its rise with energy, and the ${\mathit{p}}_{\mathit{T}}^{2}$ and ${\mathit{x}}_{\mathit{F}}$ distributions can be explained by a high mass for the charm quark (${\mathit{m}}_{\mathit{c}}$=1.${74}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}0.18}^{+0.13}$ GeV/${\mathit{c}}^{2}$) and a soft-gluon distribution [G(x)\ensuremath{\sim}(1-x${)}_{\mathit{g}}^{\mathit{n}}$, where ${\mathit{n}}_{\mathit{g}}$=7.1\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2.2].

22 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the decay of the Fermilab charm photoproduction experiment E691 was investigated and the resulting upper limit was {ital B}(1.7{plus minus}0.3)%.
Abstract: We have searched for the decay {ital D}{sub {ital s}}{sup +}{r arrow}{phi}{ital e}{sup +}{nu}{sub {ital e}} in data from the Fermilab charm photoproduction experiment E691. The resulting upper limit is {ital B}({ital D}{sub {ital s}}{sup +}{r arrow}{phi}{ital e}{sup +}{nu}{sub {ital e}}){lt}0.45{ital B}({ital D}{sub {ital s}}{sup +}{r arrow}{phi}{pi}{sup +}). Since the branching fraction for {ital D}{sub {ital s}}{sup +}{r arrow}{phi}{ital e}{sup +}{nu}{sub {ital e}} can be calculated from the measured branching fraction {ital B}({ital D}{sup +}{r arrow}{ital {bar K}} {sup *0}{ital e}{sup +}{nu}{sub {ital e}}) to be (1.7{plus minus}0.3)%, this implies a 90%-confidence-level lower limit on {ital B}({ital D}{sub {ital s}}{sup +}{r arrow}{phi}{pi}{sup +}) of 3.4%.

10 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Upper limits are obtained for the two-body decays from the Fermilab photoproduction experiment E-691 and the resonant subcomponent fractions are also analyzed.
Abstract: We report measurements of the decays {ital D}{sup 0}{r arrow}{ital K}{sup {minus}}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup {minus}}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup 0}, {ital D}{sup 0}{r arrow}{ital {bar K}}{sup 0}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup {minus}}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup {minus}}, and {ital D}{sup +}{r arrow}{ital K}{sup {minus}}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup {minus}} from the Fermilab photoproduction experiment E-691. The resonant subcomponent fractions are also analyzed. Upper limits are obtained for the two-body decays {ital D}{sup 0}{r arrow}{ital {bar K}} {sup *0}{omega} and {ital D}{sup 0}{r arrow}{ital {bar K}} {sup *0}{eta}.

5 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The relative branching ratios of the decays from Fermilab photoproduction experiment E691 are measured and the average branching ratio is 1.7 at 90% confidence level.
Abstract: We report measurements of the decays {Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}p{bar K} {sup 0}, {Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}p{bar K} {sup 0}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup {minus}}, {Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}{Lambda}{sup 0}{pi}{sup +}, and {Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}{Lambda}{sup 0}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup {minus}} from Fermilab photoproduction experiment E691. We have measured the relative branching ratios {ital B}({Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}p{bar K}{sup 0})/{ital B} ({Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}pK{sup {minus}}{pi}{sup +})=0.55{plus minus}0.17{plus minus}0.14, {ital B}({Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}{Lambda}{sup 0}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup {minus}}0)/ {ital B}({Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}{ital pK}{sup {minus}}{pi}{sup +})=0.82{plus minus}0.29{plus minus}0.27, {ital B}({Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}{Lambda}{sup 0}{pi}{sup +})/{ital B}({Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}{ital pK}{sup {minus}}{pi}{sup +}){lt}0.33 at 90% confidence level, and {ital B}({Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}p{bar K} {sup 0}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup {minus}})/{ital B}({Lambda}{sub {ital c}}{sup +}{r arrow}{ital pK}{sup {minus}}{pi}{sup +}){lt}1.7 at 90% confidence level.

3 citations


15 Nov 1990
TL;DR: Experiment E769 at Fermilab obtained charm hadroproduction data during the 1987-88 fixed target running period with a 250 GeV hadron beam incident on thin target foils of Be, Al, Cu, and W as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Experiment E769 at Fermilab obtained charm hadroproduction data during the 1987-88 Fixed Target running period with a 250 GeV hadron beam incident on thin target foils of Be, Al, Cu, and W. From an analysis of 25% of the recorded 400M trigger sample we have explored the Feynman x, p{sub t}{sup 2} and the atomic number dependence of charm quark production using samples of D{sup +} and D{sup 0} mesons. 7 refs., 4 figs.

2 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the decays of the branching fractions obtained from Fermilab photoproduction experiment E691 were reported, and the relative branching fraction obtained were 1.039 and 0.19, respectively.
Abstract: We report measurements of the decays ${D}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\overline{K}}^{0}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}$, ${D}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\overline{K}}^{0}{K}^{+}$, and $D_{s}^{}{}_{}{}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\overline{K}}^{0}{K}^{+}$ from Fermilab photoproduction experiment E691. The relative branching fractions obtained are $\frac{B({D}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\overline{K}}^{0}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+})}{B({D}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}^{\ensuremath{-}}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+})}=0.274\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.030\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.031$, $\frac{B({D}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\overline{K}}^{0}{K}^{+})}{B({D}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\overline{K}}^{0}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+})}=0.271\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.065\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.039$, and $\frac{B(D_{s}^{}{}_{}{}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\overline{K}}^{0}{K}^{+})}{B(D_{s}^{}{}_{}{}^{+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\varphi}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+})}=1.15\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.31\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.19$.

2 citations