scispace - formally typeset
A

Alexander Schmitt

Researcher at University of Ulm

Publications -  58
Citations -  847

Alexander Schmitt is an academic researcher from University of Ulm. The author has contributed to research in topics: Statistical classification & Feature (machine learning). The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 57 publications receiving 786 citations. Previous affiliations of Alexander Schmitt include Daimler AG & Information Technology University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Anger recognition in speech using acoustic and linguistic cues

TL;DR: The present study elaborates on the exploitation of both linguistic and acoustic feature modeling for anger classification by evaluating classification success using the f1 measurement in addition to overall accuracy figures.
Proceedings Article

A Parameterized and Annotated Spoken Dialog Corpus of the CMU Let's Go Bus Information System

TL;DR: This work introduces an annotated and standardized corpus in the Spoken Dialog Systems (SDS) domain intended as a standardized basis for classification and evaluation tasks regarding task success prediction, dialog quality estimation or emotion recognition to foster comparability between different approaches on these fields.
Proceedings Article

Modeling and Predicting Quality in Spoken Human-Computer Interaction

TL;DR: The model can be employed to estimate the quality of the ongoing interaction at arbitrary points in a spoken human-computer interaction to show that the use of 52 completely automatic features characterizing the system-user exchange significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interaction Quality

TL;DR: This study presents a novel expert-based approach to assess the quality of ongoing Spoken Dialog System (SDS) interactions and concludes that this paradigm could render SDSs more user friendly and improve user acceptance.
Proceedings Article

On Quality Ratings for Spoken Dialogue Systems -- Experts vs. Users

TL;DR: This paper analyzes the relationship between user and expert ratings by investigating models which combine the advantages of both types of ratings and recommends to use expert ratings instead of user ratings in general.