Cause, conseguenze e strategie di mitigazione Proponiamo il primo di una serie di articoli in cui affronteremo l’attuale problema dei mutamenti climatici. Presentiamo il documento redatto, votato e pubblicato dall’Ipcc - Comitato intergovernativo sui cambiamenti climatici - che illustra la sintesi delle ricerche svolte su questo tema rilevante.

/pdf/climate-change-2007-the-physical-science-basis-1x93ttz9jt.pdf

Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis.

In 1997, the global value of ecosystem services was estimated to average $33 trillion/yr in 1995 $US ($46 trillion/yr in 2007 $US). In this paper, we provide an updated estimate based on updated unit ecosystem service values and land use change estimates between 1997 and 2011. We also address some of the critiques of the 1997 paper. Using the same methods as in the 1997 paper but with updated data, the estimate for the total global ecosystem services in 2011 is $125 trillion/yr (assuming updated unit values and changes to biome areas) and $145 trillion/yr (assuming only unit values changed), both in 2007 $US. From this we estimated the loss of eco-services from 1997 to 2011 due to land use change at $4.3–20.2 trillion/yr, depending on which unit values are used. Global estimates expressed in monetary accounting units, such as this, are useful to highlight the magnitude of eco-services, but have no specific decision-making context. However, the underlying data and models can be applied at multiple scales to assess changes resulting from various scenarios and policies. We emphasize that valuation of eco-services (in whatever units) is not the same as commodification or privatization. Many eco-services are best considered public goods or common pool resources, so conventional markets are often not the best institutional frameworks to manage them. However, these services must be (and are being) valued, and we need new, common asset institutions to better take these values into account.

/pdf/changes-in-the-global-value-of-ecosystem-services-1l97k9k1qb.pdf

Changes in the global value of ecosystem services

Nature provides a wide range of benefits to people. There is increasing consensus about the importance of incorporating these “ecosystem services” into resource management decisions, but quantifying the levels and values of these services has proven difficult. We use a spatially explicit modeling tool, Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST), to predict changes in ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, and commodity production levels. We apply InVEST to stakeholder-defined scenarios of land-use/land-cover change in the Willamette Basin, Oregon. We found that scenarios that received high scores for a variety of ecosystem services also had high scores for biodiversity, suggesting there is little tradeoff between biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services. Scenarios involving more development had higher commodity production values, but lower levels of biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services. However, including payments for carbon sequestration alleviates this tradeoff. Quantifying ecosystem services in a spatially explicit manner, and analyzing tradeoffs between them, can help to make natural resource decisions more effective, efficient, and defensible.

https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1890/080023

Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales

Economics and Information Theory

The integration of GIS and multicriteria decision analysis has attracted significant interest over the last 15 years or so This paper surveys the GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis (GIS‐MCDA) approaches using a literature review and classification of articles from 1990 to 2004 An electronic search indicated that over 300 articles appeared in refereed journals The paper provides taxonomy of those articles and identifies trends and developments in GIS‐MCDA

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13658810600661508

GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature

The Patuxent Landscape Model (PLM) is designed to simulate fundamental ecological processes on the watershed scale, in interaction with an economic component that predicts the land use patterns. The paper focuses on the ecological component of the PLM and describes how the spatial and structural rescaling can be instrumental for calibration of complex spatially distributed models. The PLM is based on a modified General Ecosystem Model (GEM) that is replicated across a grid of cells that compose the rasterized landscape. Different habitats and land use types translate into different parameter sets to be fed into GEM. Cells are linked by horizontal fluxes of material and information, driven mostly by the hydrologic flows. This approach provides additional flexibility in scaling up and down over a range of spatial resolutions and is essential to track the land use change patterns generated by the economic component. Structural modularity is another important feature that is implemented in the general purpose software packages (Spatial Modeling Environment and Collaborative Modeling Environment), that the PLM employs. © 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Patuxent landscape model: integrated ecological economic modeling of a watershed

Optimization methodology for land use patterns using spatially explicit landscape models

Understanding the way regional landscapes operate, evolve, and change is a key area of research for ecosystem science. It is also essential to support the “place-based” management approach being advocated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and other management agencies. We developed a spatially explicit, process-based model of the 2352 km2 Patuxent River watershed in Maryland to integrate data and knowledge over several spatial, temporal, and complexity scales, and to serve as an aid to regional management. In particular, the model addresses the effects of both the magnitude and spatial patterns of human settlements and agricultural practices on hydrology, plant productivity, and nutrient cycling in the landscape. The spatial resolution is variable, with a maximum of 200 × 200 m to allow adequate depiction of the pattern of ecosystems and human settlement on the landscape. The temporal resolution is different for various components of the model, ranging from hourly time steps in the hydrologic sector to yearly time steps in the economic land-use transition module.

We used a modular, multiscale approach to calibrate and test the model. Model results show good agreement with data for several components of the model at several scales. A range of scenarios with the calibrated model shows the implications of past and alternative future land-use patterns and policies. We analyzed 18 scenarios including: (1) historical land-use in 1650, 1850, 1950, 1972, 1990, and 1997; (2) a “buildout” scenario based on fully developing all the land currently zoned for development; (3) four future development patterns based on an empirical economic land-use conversion model; (4) agricultural “best management practices” that lower fertilizer application; (5) four “replacement” scenarios of land-use change to analyze the relative contributions of agriculture and urban land uses; and (6) two “clustering” scenarios with significantly more and less clustered residential development than the current pattern. Results indicate the complex nature of the landscape response and the need for spatially explicit modeling.

/pdf/integrated-ecological-economic-modeling-of-the-patuxent-1x9d1kwfj3.pdf

Integrated ecological economic modeling of the Patuxent River Watershed, Maryland

https://www.uvm.edu/~jfarley/UFBAEE/sust%20corrected%20proofs.pdf

Alexey Voinov

Papers

Patuxent landscape model: integrated ecological economic modeling of a watershed

Optimization methodology for land use patterns using spatially explicit landscape models

Integrated ecological economic modeling of the Patuxent River Watershed, Maryland

Reconciling sustainability, systems theory and discounting

Landscape Simulation Modeling: "A Spatially Explicit, Dynamic Approach"