https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00561753/document

International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND Treatment with cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor, improves overall and progression-free survival and preserves the quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer that has not responded to chemotherapy. The mutation status of the K-ras gene in the tumor may affect the response to cetuximab and have treatment-independent prognostic value. METHODS We analyzed tumor samples, obtained from 394 of 572 patients (68.9%) with colo rectal cancer who were randomly assigned to receive cetuximab plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone, to look for activating mutations in exon 2 of the K-ras gene. We assessed whether the mutation status of the K-ras gene was associated with survival in the cetuximab and supportive-care groups. RESULTS Of the tumors evaluated for K-ras mutations, 42.3% had at least one mutation in exon 2 of the gene. The effectiveness of cetuximab was significantly associated with K-ras mutation status (P = 0.01 and P<0.001 for the interaction of K-ras mutation status with overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively). In patients with wild-type K-ras tumors, treatment with cetuximab as compared with supportive care alone significantly improved overall survival (median, 9.5 vs. 4.8 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.74; P<0.001) and progression-free survival (median, 3.7 months vs. 1.9 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.54; P<0.001). Among patients with mutated K-ras tumors, there was no significant difference between those who were treated with cetuximab and those who received supportive care alone with respect to overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.98; P = 0.89) or progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; P = 0.96). In the group of patients receiving best supportive care alone, the mutation status of the K-ras gene was not significantly associated with overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.01; P = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS Patients with a colorectal tumor bearing mutated K-ras did not benefit from cetuximab, whereas patients with a tumor bearing wild-type K-ras did benefit from cetuximab. The mutation status of the K-ras gene had no influence on survival among patients treated with best supportive care alone. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00079066.)

/pdf/k-ras-mutations-and-benefit-from-cetuximab-in-advanced-8o4hhi5ipn.pdf

K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer.

Purpose Panitumumab, a fully human antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has activity in a subset of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Although activating mutations in KRAS, a small G-protein downstream of EGFR, correlate with poor response to anti-EGFR antibodies in mCRC, their role as a selection marker has not been established in randomized trials. Patients and Methods KRAS mutations were detected using polymerase chain reaction on DNA from tumor sections collected in a phase III mCRC trial comparing panitumumab monotherapy to best supportive care (BSC). We tested whether the effect of panitumumab on progression-free survival (PFS) differed by KRAS status. Results KRAS status was ascertained in 427 (92%) of 463 patients (208 panitumumab, 219 BSC). KRAS mutations were found in 43% of patients. The treatment effect on PFS in the wild-type (WT) KRAS group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.59) was significantly greater (P .0001) than in the mutant group (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.36). Median PFS in the WT KRAS group was 12.3 weeks for panitumumab and 7.3 weeks for BSC. Response rates to panitumumab were 17% and 0%, for the WT and mutant groups, respectively. WT KRAS patients had longer overall survival (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.82; treatment arms combined). Consistent with longer exposure, more grade III treatment-related toxicities occurred in the WT KRAS group. No significant differences in toxicity were observed between the WT KRAS group and the overall population. Conclusion Panitumumab monotherapy efficacy in mCRC is confined to patients with WT KRAS tumors. KRAS status should be considered in selecting patients with mCRC as candidates for panitumumab monotherapy.

/pdf/wild-type-kras-is-required-for-panitumumab-efficacy-in-44cqqe1bte.pdf

Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

From the Departments of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology (R.S.H., J.V.H., S.M.L.), Cancer Biology (R.S.H., J.V.H.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (S.M.L.), University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Address reprint requests to Dr. Lippman at the Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Unit 432, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, or at slippman@ mdanderson.org.

Molecular origins of cancer: Lung cancer

Functional activation of growth factors and receptors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family occurs in most epithelial-cell cancers, rendering EGFR a target for cancer treatment. This article discusses the mechanisms of action of EGFR inhibitors, their anticancer activity, and clinical issues concerning their use in the treatment of patients with cancer.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMra0707704

EGFR Antagonists in Cancer Treatment

Purpose: EGFR gene mutations and increased EGFR copy number have been associated with favorable response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In contrast, KRAS mutation has been shown to predict poor response to such therapy. We tested the utility of combinations of these three markers in predicting response and survival in patients with NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKI with available archival tissue specimens were included. EGFR and KRAS mutations were analyzed using PCR-based sequencing. EGFR copy number was analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results: The study included 73 patients, 59 of whom had all three potential markers successfully analyzed. EGFR mutation was detected in 7 of 71 patients (9.8%), increased EGFR copy number in 32 of 59 (54.2%), and KRAS mutation in 16 of 70 (22.8%). EGFR mutation ( P EGFR copy number ( P = 0.48) correlated with favorable response. No survival benefit was detected in patients with either of these features. KRAS mutation correlated with progressive disease ( P = 0.04) and shorter median time to progression ( P = 0.0025) but not with survival. Patients with both EGFR mutation and increased EGFR copy number had a >99.7% chance of objective response, whereas patients with KRAS mutation with or without increased EGFR copy number had a >96.5% chance of disease progression. Conclusion: KRAS mutation should be included as indicator of resistance in the panel of markers used to predict response to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC.

https://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/clincanres/13/10/2890.full.pdf

KRAS Mutation Is an Important Predictor of Resistance to Therapy with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

To identify the characteristics and sequence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) abnormalities relevant to the pathogenesis and progression of lung adenocarcinoma, we performed a precise mapping analysis of EGFR mutation, gene copy number, and total and phosphorylated EGFR protein expression for the same tissue sites. We examined normal bronchial and bronchiolar epithelium (NBE) and tumor tissues obtained from 50 formalin-fixed lung adenocarcinomas, including 24 EGFR-mutant primary tumors with nine corresponding lymph node metastases and 26 wild-type primary tumors. NBE in 12 of 24 (50%) mutant and 3 of 26 (12%) wild-type tumors harbored EGFR mutations; these NBE also showed a lack of EGFR copy number increase and frequent EGFR (69%) and phosphorylated EGFR (33%) overexpression. EGFR mutation and protein overexpression were more frequent in NBE sites within tumors than in NBE sites adjacent to and distant from tumors, suggesting a localized field effect. Sites with high and low EGFR copy numbers were heterogeneously distributed in six of nine primary tumors and in one of eight metastases. EGFR protein overexpression was significantly higher in metastasis sites than in primary tumors. We conclude from our findings that EGFR mutations and protein overexpression are early phenomena in the pathogenesis of lung adenocarcinoma and that EGFR mutation precedes an increase in gene copy number. In EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma metastases, the higher levels of EGFR overexpression and more homogeneously distributed high gene copy numbers suggest tumor progression. Our findings have important implications for the development of new strategies for targeted chemoprevention and therapy in lung adenocarcinoma using EGFR inhibitors.

https://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/content/canprevres/1/3/192.full.pdf

Ana Carolina Xavier

Papers

KRAS Mutation Is an Important Predictor of Resistance to Therapy with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Abnormalities in the Pathogenesis and Progression of Lung Adenocarcinomas