A
Andrew C. Inkpen
Researcher at Arizona State University
Publications - 78
Citations - 16232
Andrew C. Inkpen is an academic researcher from Arizona State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Organizational learning & Alliance. The author has an hindex of 40, co-authored 74 publications receiving 15428 citations. Previous affiliations of Andrew C. Inkpen include Nanyang Technological University & University of Western Ontario.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Knowledge transfer and international joint ventures: the case of NUMMI and General Motors
TL;DR: Using a case study of NUMMI, a joint venture between General Motors and Toyota, this research note examines alliances and knowledge transfer with a focus on the organizational processes used to transfer knowledge.
Journal ArticleDOI
Stakeholder Theory and The Corporate Objective Revisited: A Reply
TL;DR: Proponents of stakeholder views such as Freeman et al. appear to be unable to go beyond critiques of the shareholder view by failing to offer an empirically supportable alternative theory.
Journal ArticleDOI
Japanese firms and the decline of the Japanese expatriate
Paul W. Beamish,Andrew C. Inkpen +1 more
TL;DR: Using a comprehensive database of Japanese subsidiaries, this paper showed that the number of Japanese expatriates is declining and has been for some time, and that Japanese firms are beginning to recognize the importance of empowering local management and are becoming more truly global in how they compete.
Journal ArticleDOI
Cross-border R&D alliances, absorptive capacity and technology learning
Chang Su Kim,Andrew C. Inkpen +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a model of technology learning by integrating technological capabilities and alliance knowledge in a framework of absorptive capacity, and differentiated between absolute and relative components of absorbent capacity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Why Do Some Strategic Alliances Persist beyond Their Useful Life
Andrew C. Inkpen,Jerry Ross +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the factors that contribute to firms' persistence with failing strategic alliances and propose measures that can effectively counter persistence of strategic alliances, but they do not focus on why failure occurs.