We review the effects of fishing on benthic fauna, habitat, diversity, community structure and trophic interactions in tropical, temperate and polar marine environments and consider whether it is possible to predict or manage fishing-induced changes in marine ecosystems Such considerations are timely given the disillusionment with some fishery management strategies and that policy makers need a scientific basis for deciding whether they should respond to social, economic and political demands for instituting or preventing ecosystem-based management Fishing has significant direct and indirect effects on habitat, and on the diversity, structure and productivity of benthic communities These effects are most readily identified and last longest in those areas that experience infrequent natural disturbance The initiation of fishing in an unfished system leads to dramatic changes in fish community structure As fishing intensity increases the additional effects are more difficult to detect Fishing has accelerated and magnified natural declines in the abundance of many forage fishes and this has lead to reduced reproductive success and abundance in birds and marine mammals However, such donor-controlled dynamics are less apparent in food webs where fishes are the top predators since their feeding strategies are rather more plastic than those of most birds and mammals Fishers tend to target species in sequence as a fishery develops and this leads to changes in the composition of the fished communities with time The dramatic and apparently compensatory shifts in the biomass of different species in many fished ecosystems have often been driven by environmental change rather than the indirect effects of fishing Indeed, in most pelagic systems, species replacements would have occurred, albeit less rapidly, in the absence of fishing pressure In those cases when predator or prey species fill a key role, fishing can have dramatic indirect effects on community structure Thus fishing has shifted some coral reef ecosystems to alternate stable states because there is tight predator–prey coupling between invertebrate feeding fishes and sea urchins Fishing has reduced, and locally extirpated, populations of predatory fishes These reductions do not have a consistent effect on the abundance and diversity of their prey: environmental processes control prey populations in some systems, whereas top-down processes are more important in others By-catch which is discarded during fishing activities may sustain populations of scavenging species, particularly seabirds We conclude by identifying the circumstances in which new research is needed to guide managers and stress the importance of unfished control sites for studies of fishing effects We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of closed area management (marine reserves) and the conditions under which such management is likely to provide benefits for the fishery or ecosystem

/pdf/the-effects-of-fishing-on-marine-ecosystems-4zb9eqofxt.pdf

The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems

Bottom trawling and use of other mobile fishing gear have effects on the seabed that resemble forest clearcutting, a terrestrial disturbance recognized as a major threat to biological diversity and economic sustainability. Structures in marine benthic communities are generally much smaller than those in forests, but structural complexity is no less important to their biodiversity. Use of mobile fishing gear crushes, buries, and exposes marine animals and structures on and in the substratum, sharply reducing structural diversity. Its severity is roughly comparable to other natural and anthropogenic marine disturbances. It also alters biogeochemical cycles, perhaps even globally. Recovery after disturbance is often slow because recruitment is patchy and growth to maturity takes years, decades, or more for some structure-forming species. Trawling and dredging are especially problematic where the return interval—the time from one dredging or trawling event to the next—is shorter than the time it takes for the ecosystem to recover; extensive areas can be trawled 100–700% per year or more. The effects of mobile fishing gear on biodiversity are most severe where natural disturbance is least prevalent, particularly on the outer continental shelf and slope, where storm-wave damage is negligible and biological processes, including growth, tend to be slow. Recent advances in fishing technology (e.g., rockhopper gear, global positioning systems, fish finders) have all but eliminated what were de facto refuges from trawling. The frequency of trawling (in percentage of the continental shelf trawled per year) is orders of magnitude higher than other severe seabed disturbances, annually covering an area equivalent to perhaps half of the world’s continental shelf, or 150 times the land area that is clearcut yearly. Mobile fishing gear can have large and long-lasting effects on benthic communities, including young stages of commercially important fishes, although some species benefit when structural complexity is reduced. These findings are crucial for implementation of “Essential Fish Habitat” provisions of the U.S. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act which aim to protect nursery and feeding habitat for commercial fishes. Using a precautionary approach to management, modifying fishing methods, and creating refuges free of mobile fishing gear are ways to reduce effects on biological diversity and commercial fish habitat.

Perturbaciones del Lecho Marino por Artes de Pesca Mobiles: Una Comparacion con la Tala Forestals

Los arrastres de fondo y el uso de otras artes de pesca moviles tienen efectos en el lecho marino que se asemejan a la tala total de bosques, que es a su vez una pertubacion terrestre reconocida como una de las mayores amenazas a la diversidad biologica y la sustentabilidad economica. Las estructuras en comunidades marinas benticas son generalmente mucho mas pequenas que aquellas en los bosques, pero la complejidad estructural no es menos importante que la biodiversidad. El uso de artes de pesca moviles quiebra, sepulta y expone animales marinos y estructuras sobre y en el substrato, reduciendo marcadamente la diversidad estructural. Su severidad es burdamente comparable con otras perturbaciones marinas de orden natural o antropogenico. Tambien altera los ciclos biogeoquimicos, de hecho a nivel mundial. La recuperacion despues de una pertubacion es frecuentemente lenta debido a que el reclutamiento es por parches y el crecimiento para alcanzar la madurez toma anos, decadas o aun mas para algunas especies que forman estructuras. Los arrastres de fondo y dragados son especialmente problematicos donde el intervalo de retorno (tiempo entre un evento de dragado o arrastre y otro) es mas corto que el tiempo que toma a un ecosistema recuperarse;arears extensas son arrastradas entre un 100 y 700% por ano o mas. Los efectos de las artes de pesca moviles en la biodiversidad son mas severos cuando las perturbaciones naturales son menos prevalentes, particularmente en las afueras de la plataforma continental y la pendiente, donde el dano del oleaje por tormentas es negligible y los procesos biologicos (incluyendo crecimiento) tienden a ser lentos. Recientes avances en tecnologia pesquera (e.g., sistemas de posicionamiento global, detectores de peces) aparentemente tienen todo, pero eliminan lo que de facto fueran refugios contra arrastres. La frecuencia de los arrastres (en porcentaje de la plataforma continental arrastrada por ano) es ordenes de magnitud mayor que otras perturbaciones severas al lecho marino, anualmente la cobertura de area es equivalente quiza a la mitad de la plataforma continental marina, o 150 veces el area de tierra que es talada anualmente. Las artes de pesca moviles pueden tener impactos grandes y de larga duracion en las comunidades bentonicas, incluyendo estadios jovenes de peces de importancia comercial, aunque algunas especies se benefician cuando la complejidad estructural es reducida. Estos descubrimientos son cruciales para la implementacion de el “habitat esencial para peces” del Acta de Conservacion y Manejo de Pesquerias Magnuson-Stevens de los Estados Unidos y que pretende establecer habitats de reproduccion y alimentacion para peces comerciales. El uso de una aproximacion precautoria de manejo, la modificacion de metodos de pesca y la creacion de refugios libres de artes de pesca moviles son formas para reducir los efectos en la diversidad biologica y el habitat para peces comerciales.

Disturbance of the Seabed by Mobile Fishing Gear: A Comparison to Forest Clearcutting

▪ Abstract The direct effects of marine habitat disturbance by commercial fishing have been well documented. However, the potential ramifications to the ecological function of seafloor communities and ecosystems have yet to be considered. Soft-sediment organisms create much of their habitat's structure and also have crucial roles in many population, community, and ecosystem processes. Many of these roles are filled by species that are sensitive to habitat disturbance. Functional extinction refers to the situation in which species become so rare that they do not fulfill the ecosystem roles that have evolved in the system. This loss to the ecosystem occurs when there are restrictions in the size, density, and distribution of organisms that threaten the biodiversity, resilience, or provision of ecosystem services. Once the functionally important components of an ecosystem are missing, it is extremely difficult to identify and understand ecological thresholds. The extent and intensity of human disturbance to ...

/pdf/disturbance-to-marine-benthic-habitats-by-trawling-and-1p5bzlbz50.pdf

Disturbance to Marine Benthic Habitats by Trawling and Dredging: Implications for Marine Biodiversity

1. The effects of towed bottom-fishing gear on benthic communities is the subject of heated debate, but the generality of trawl effects with respect to gear and habitat types is poorly understood. To address this deficiency we undertook a meta-analysis of 39 published fishing impact studies. 2. Our analysis shows that inter-tidal dredging and scallop dredging have the greatest initial effects on benthic biota, while trawling has less effect. Fauna in stable gravel, mud and biogenic habitats are more adversely affected than those in less consolidated coarse sediments. 3. Recovery rate appears most rapid in these less physically stable habitats, which are generally inhabited by more opportunistic species. However, defined areas that are fished in excess of three times per year (as occurs in parts of the North Sea and Georges Bank) are likely to be maintained in a permanently altered state. 4. We conclude that intuition about how fishing ought to affect benthic communities is generally supported, but that there are substantial gaps in the available data, which urgently need to be filled. In particular, data on impacts and recovery of epifaunal structure-forming benthic communities are badly needed.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/2647402.pdf

A quantitative analysis of fishing impacts on shelf-sea benthos

The detection of trends in ecosystems depends upon (1) a good description of the foundation or benchmark against which changes are measured and (2) a distinction between natural and anthropogenic changes. Patterns and mechanisms observed over 25 years in a large kelp forest suggest that definition of a meaningful benchmark is impossible, because many of the large animals have been gone for years to decades, and kelps are sensitive to large-scale, low-frequency El Nifio-Southern Oscillation events and longer term regime shifts. A shift in the oceanographic climate has significantly reduced the average size and carrying capacity of the dominant plant. The animals that have been functionally removed from the community include sea otters, black sea bass, yellowtail, white sea bass, and abalones. Other species are still present, but fisheries have had huge effects on the abundances, size-frequencies, and/or spatial distributions of sheephead, kelp bass, rays, flatfish, rock fish, spiny lobsters, and red sea urchins. Now even sea cucumbers, crabs, and small snails are subject to unregulated fishing. The plants continue to exist without a hint of the effects of the loss of so much animal biomass. Furthermore, most of the megafauna have been removed with very little documentation or historical understanding of what the natural community was like. Thus, our ability to separate anthropogenic impacts from the "natural" dynamics of the system is severely compromised. We discuss the importance of both an ecosystem focus on productivity and careful monitoring of as many populations as possible. In addition, we show that this community is not tightly integrated with mutual dependencies; hence, many species can be removed without much affecting the rest of the ecosystem.

/pdf/sliding-baselines-ghosts-and-reduced-expectations-in-kelp-2vn3av7gc0.pdf

Sliding baselines, ghosts, and reduced expectations in kelp forest communities

Fishing gear alters seafloor habitats, but the extent of these alterations, and their effects, have not been quantified extensively in the northwest Atlantic. Understanding the extent of these impacts, and their effects on populations of living marine resources, is needed to properly manage current and future levels of fishing effort and fishing power. For example, the entire U.S. side of the Gulf of Maine was impacted annually by mobile fishing gear between 1984 and 1990, based on calculations of area swept by trawl and dredge gear. Georges Bank was imparted three to nearly four times annually during the same period. Studies at three sites in the Gulf of Maine (off Swans Island, Jeffreys Bank, and Stellwagen Bank) showed that mobile fishing gear altered the physical structure (=complexity) of benthic habitats. Complexity was reduced by direct removal of biogenic (e.g., sponges, hydrozoans, bryozoans, amphipod tubes, holothurians, shell aggregates) and‐ sedimentary (e.g., sand waves, depressions)...

Andrew N. Shepard

Papers

The impacts of mobile fishing gear on seafloor habitats in the gulf of Maine (Northwest Atlantic): Implications for conservation of fish populations

The impacts of mobile fishing gear on low topography benthic habitats in the Gulf of Maine (Northwest Atlantic): A preliminary report