scispace - formally typeset
A

Antonio Masiero

Researcher at University of Padua

Publications -  137
Citations -  6951

Antonio Masiero is an academic researcher from University of Padua. The author has contributed to research in topics: Supersymmetry & CP violation. The author has an hindex of 37, co-authored 137 publications receiving 6692 citations. Previous affiliations of Antonio Masiero include University of California, Berkeley & CERN.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A complete analysis of FCNC and CP constraints in general SUSY extensions of the standard model

TL;DR: In this article, the full set of constraints on gluino and photino-mediated SUSY contributions to FCNC and CP violating phenomena are analyzed and a model-independent parameterization for the mass insertion method is provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

A natural solution to the μ-problem in supergravity theories

TL;DR: In this article, a natural way to avoid the introduction by hand of a small mass scale μ in the observable sector of N = 1 supergravity theories is proposed, where all low energy mass parameters arise only from supergravity breaking and SU (2) × U (1) is left unbroken in the limit of exact supersymmetry.
Journal ArticleDOI

Delta M(K) and epsilon(K) in SUSY at the next-to-leading order

TL;DR: In this article, a next-to-leading order analysis of?S = 2 processes beyond the Standard Model is presented. But the analysis is restricted to the first two generations of down-type squarks.
Journal ArticleDOI

On the MSW effect with massless neutrinos and no mixing in the vacuum

TL;DR: In this article, the general properties of neutrino transitions in matter induced by neutrinos flavour changing neutral current (FCNC) interactions are analyzed and it is shown that matter-enhanced transitions can take place even with zero mass.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dark matter candidates: a ten-point test

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a ten-point test that a new particle has to pass in order to be considered a viable dark matter candidate, i.e., does it match the appropriate relic density? (II) is it cold? (III) is neutral? (IV) is consistent with BBN? (V) leaves stellar evolution unchanged.