Biomethane production improvement by enzymatic pre-treatments and enhancers of sewage sludge anaerobic digestion

Optimization of some fermentation conditions for the production of extracellular amylases by using Chryseobacterium and Bacillus isolates from organic kitchen wastes.

/pdf/fermenting-rice-bran-as-a-carbon-source-for-biofloc-2pchgkc2d8.pdf

Fermenting rice bran as a carbon source for biofloc technology improved the water quality, growth, feeding efficiencies, and biochemical composition of African catfish Clarias gariepinus juveniles

Optimisation and production of alpha amylase from thermophilic Bacillus spp. and its application in food waste biodegradation

Biofilm is a syntrophic association of sessile groups of microbial cells that adhere to biotic and abiotic surfaces with the help of pili and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). EPSs also prevent penetration of antimicrobials/antibiotics into the sessile groups of cells. Hence, methods and agents to avoid or remove biofilms are urgently needed. Enzymes play important roles in the removal of biofilm in natural environments and may be promising agents for this purpose. As the major component of the EPS is polysaccharide, amylase has inhibited EPS by preventing the adherence of the microbial cells, thus making amylase a suitable antimicrobial agent. On the other hand, salivary amylase binds to amylase-binding protein of plaque-forming Streptococci and initiates the formation of biofilm. This review investigates the contradictory actions and microbe-associated genes of amylases, with emphasis on their structural and functional characteristics.

/pdf/amylases-biofilm-inducer-or-biofilm-inhibitor-2kf9nh3ne3.pdf

Amylases: Biofilm Inducer or Biofilm Inhibitor?

http://www.scielo.br/pdf/bjm/v42n4/v42n4a22.pdf

Comparative study on production of α-Amylase from Bacillus licheniformis strains

OBJECTIVE
This study evaluated differences in eosinophil (Eos) count in the right colon (RC) and left colon (LC) relative to known clinical and pathologic features.


METHODS
H&E slides from 276 subjects with biopsies taken from both RC and LC were reviewed. Eos/mm2 were counted in the area with highest concentration then correlated with clinical and pathologic findings for RC and LC.


RESULTS
There were higher numbers of Eos/mm2 in RC than in LC (mean 177 vs 122, respectively p<0.0001), and there was significant positive correlation between Eos numbers in the two locations (r=0.57, p<0.001). In RC, the mean Eos/mm2 was 242 with active chronic colitis, 195 with inactive chronic colitis, 160 in microscopic colitis, 144 in quiescent IBD, and 142 with normal histology (p<0.001), and was higher in males (204 vs 164, p=0.022). In LC, mean Eos/mm2 was 186 with active chronic colitis, 168 with inactive chronic colitis, 154 in microscopic colitis, 82 in quiescent IBD, and 84 with normal histology (p<0.001), and was higher in males (154 vs 107, p<0.001). In biopsies with normal histology, RC showed higher mean Eos/mm2 in Asian patients (228 vs 139, p=0.019), and patients with history of UC (205 vs 136, p=0.004), but was not significantly different in patients with or without irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) or history of Crohn's disease (CD). In LC the mean Eos/mm2 was higher in males (102 vs 77, p=0.036), and history of CD (117 vs 78, p=0.007), but was not significantly different in patients with or without IBS-D or history of UC. The number of Eos/mm2 was greater in biopsies performed in the summer than during other seasons of the year.


CONCLUSION
The mean number of Eos/mm2 in colorectal biopsies varies significantly by location, histopathologic changes, clinical diagnosis, season, gender and ethnicity. Of particular interest is the association between high Eos/mm2 in RC biopsies with otherwise normal histology and clinical history of UC, and in LC biopsies with clinical history of CD. Additional larger and prospective studies that include normal healthy volunteers are needed to establish a reliable cutoff for the histopathologic diagnosis of eosinophilic colitis, taking into consideration the biopsy site within the colon and rectum, as well as patient gender and ethnicity.Presented in part at the annual American College of Gastroenterology meeting, San Antonio, TX October 2019.

Colonic Eosinophilia: Clinicopathologic Study of Paired Right and Left Colon Biopsies from 276 Patients.

Background The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) has proposed practice guidelines for evaluating patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. This study aims to assess and compare practice patterns for following ASGE guidelines for choledocholithiasis in a large academic vs. community hospital setting. Methods A total of one thousand ER indicated for choledocholithiasis were randomly selected. Patients’ demographics, total bilirubin, imaging studies including magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and ERCP results were retrospectively collected. Patients with prior sphincterotomy were excluded. We examined the following practice deviations from the current ASGE guidelines; (1) ERCP was potentially delayed in high probability cases while awaiting additional imaging studies, (2) ERCP was performed without additional imaging studies in cases of low/intermediate-risk, or (3) ERCP was performed in low/intermediate-risk cases when additional imaging studies were negative. Results A total of 640 patients with native papilla who underwent ERCP were included in the final analysis. Overall, the management of 43% (275) of patients was deviated from the applicable ASGE guidelines. Academic and community provider rates of non-adherence were 32 vs. 45%, respectively (p-value: < 0.01). Of 381 high-risk cases, 54.1% had additional imaging before ERCP. (Academic vs. community; 11.7 vs. 88.3%, p-value: < 0.01). In 26.7% (69/258) of low/intermediate risk cases, ERCP was performed without additional studies; academic (14.5%) vs. community (85.5%) (p-value: < 0.01). Finally, in 11.2% (19/170) of patients, ERCP was performed despite intermediate/low probability and negative imaging; academic (26.3%) vs. community (73.7%) (p-value: 0.02). Conclusion Our study results show that providers do not adhere to ASGE practice guidelines in 43% of suspected choledocholithiasis cases. The rate of non-adherence was significantly higher in community settings. It could be due to various reasons, including lack/delays for alternate studies (i.e., MRCP, EUS), concern regarding the length of stay, patient preference, or lack of awareness/understanding of the guidelines. Increased availability of alternate imaging and educational strategies may be needed to increase the adoption of practice guidelines across academic and community settings to improve patient outcomes and save healthcare dollars.

/pdf/practice-patterns-and-adherence-to-society-guidelines-for-1mizsfxg.pdf

Practice patterns and adherence to society guidelines for suspected choledocholithiasis: A comparison of academic and community settings from a large US healthcare system

Aswathi Chandran

Papers

Comparative study on production of α-Amylase from Bacillus licheniformis strains

Colonic Eosinophilia: Clinicopathologic Study of Paired Right and Left Colon Biopsies from 276 Patients.

Practice patterns and adherence to society guidelines for suspected choledocholithiasis: A comparison of academic and community settings from a large US healthcare system