scispace - formally typeset
B

Ben H. Thacker

Researcher at Southwest Research Institute

Publications -  77
Citations -  1095

Ben H. Thacker is an academic researcher from Southwest Research Institute. The author has contributed to research in topics: Probabilistic logic & Probabilistic analysis of algorithms. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 77 publications receiving 1042 citations.

Papers
More filters
ReportDOI

Concepts of Model Verification and Validation

TL;DR: This report attempts to describe the general philosophy, definitions, concepts, and processes for conducting a successful V&V program, motivated by the need for highly accurate numerical models for making predictions to support the SSP, and also by the lack of guidelines, standards and procedures for performing V &V for complex numerical models.
Journal ArticleDOI

Finite element visualization of fatigue crack closure in plane stress and plane strain

TL;DR: In this paper, a finite element simulation of growing fatigue cracks in both plane stress and plane strain is used as an aid to visualization and analysis of the crack closure phenomenon, where residual stress and strain fields near the crack tip are depicted by both color fringe plots and x-y graphs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Probabilistic engineering analysis using the NESSUS software

TL;DR: The goal of the reported work has been to develop a software tool that fully addresses three aspects (availability, robustness and efficiency) to enable the designer to efficiently and accurately account for uncertainties as they might affect structural reliability and risk assessment.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Probabilistic engineering analysis using the NESSUS software

TL;DR: The current capabilities of the NESSUS probabilistic analysis software are discussed and several application problems to demonstrate its effectiveness are presented and demonstrated.
Journal ArticleDOI

The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.

TL;DR: Implant shape optimization results in a more robust implant design that is less sensitive to uncertainties in joint loading, which cannot be easily controlled, and more sensitive to cement and interface properties, which are easier to modify.