scispace - formally typeset
B

Benjamin Johannes Lutz

Publications -  21
Citations -  358

Benjamin Johannes Lutz is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Emissions trading & European union. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 21 publications receiving 282 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Nonlinearity in cap-and-trade systems: The EUA price and its fundamentals

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the nonlinear relation between the EUA price and its fundamental factors, such as energy prices, macroeconomic risk factors and weather conditions, by estimating a Markov regime-switching model.
Journal ArticleDOI

The impacts of the EU ETS on efficiency and economic performance – An empirical analyses for German manufacturing firms

TL;DR: In this paper, the effect of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) on the economic performance of manufacturing firms in Germany was investigated using several parametric conditioning strategies and nearest neighbor matching.
Journal ArticleDOI

Designing an EU Energy and Climate Policy Portfolio for 2030: Implications of Overlapping Regulation under Different Levels of Electricity Demand

TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyzed the efficiency and effectiveness of a policy portfolio containing a cap and trade scheme and a target for a minimum renewable share in different states of aggregate electricity demand.
Report SeriesDOI

Competitiveness Impacts of the German Electricity Tax

TL;DR: In this article, the short-term competitiveness impacts of the German electricity tax introduced unilaterally in 1999 were investigated, and the econometric analysis showed no robust effects in either direction of the reduced electricity tax rates on firms' competitiveness.
Posted Content

Emissions trading and productivity : firm-level evidence from German manufacturing

TL;DR: In this article, the causal effect of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) on the productivity of German manufacturing firms was investigated using a difference-in-differences framework.