B
Brian Jolly
Researcher at University of Newcastle
Publications - 122
Citations - 5900
Brian Jolly is an academic researcher from University of Newcastle. The author has contributed to research in topics: Competence (human resources) & Health care. The author has an hindex of 42, co-authored 121 publications receiving 5441 citations. Previous affiliations of Brian Jolly include Newcastle University & Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: a literature review
Sue Kilminster,Brian Jolly +1 more
TL;DR: This large‐scale, interdisciplinary review of literature addressing supervision is the first from a medical education perspective to focus on clinical supervision in postgraduate and undergraduate medical education.
Journal ArticleDOI
AMEE Guide No. 27: effective educational and clinical supervision
TL;DR: This guide reviews what is known about educational and clinical supervision practice through a literature review and a questionnaire survey and identifies the need for a definition and for explicit guidelines on supervision.
Journal ArticleDOI
The relationship between competence and performance: implications for assessing practice performance.
Jan-Joost Rethans,John J. Norcini,Barón-Maldonado M,David Blackmore,Brian Jolly,Tony LaDuca,S R Lew,Gayle G. Page,Southgate Lh +8 more
TL;DR: Current views of the relationship between competence and performance are described and some of the implications of the distinctions between the two areas are delineated for the purpose of assessing doctors in practice.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessing health professionals
TL;DR: This chapter discusses how professional assessment can have a powerful educational impact by providing transparent performance criteria and returning structured formative feedback.
Journal ArticleDOI
Making sense of work‐based assessment: ask the right questions, in the right way, about the right things, of the right people
Jim Crossley,Brian Jolly +1 more
TL;DR: Workplace-based assessment (WBA) is complex, and has relied on a number of recently developed methods and instruments, of which some involve checklists and others use judgements made on rating scales as mentioned in this paper.