scispace - formally typeset
B

Brian R. Gaines

Researcher at University of Victoria

Publications -  203
Citations -  7842

Brian R. Gaines is an academic researcher from University of Victoria. The author has contributed to research in topics: Knowledge acquisition & Knowledge engineering. The author has an hindex of 44, co-authored 203 publications receiving 7644 citations. Previous affiliations of Brian R. Gaines include University of Calgary & York University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Supporting collaboration in digital journal production

TL;DR: Research is reported on group‐writing tools that deviate as little as possible from conventional word processors and assume only intermittent network connection for document exchange and conflict resolu...
Book ChapterDOI

The Cognitive Basis of Knowledge Engineering

TL;DR: Memory, judgment and choice, text comprehension, and social cognition and communication represent a selection of cognitive science domains which offer research findings of importance for knowledge engineering and the groundwork is laid for the development of cognition-support tools for knowledge Engineering.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Extending electronic mail with conceptual modeling to provide group decision support

TL;DR: An attempt to move computer-based techniques for supporting the analysis of group cognitive processes and decision-making from being specialist applications to becoming a routine organizational tool used as readily as electronic mail is reported.
Book ChapterDOI

Universal Logic as a Science of Patterns

TL;DR: This article addresses Beziau’s vision that universal logic should be capable of helping other fields of knowledge to build the right logic for the right situation, and that for some disciplines mathematical abstract conceptualization is more appropriate than symbolic formalization.
Journal Article

Human-Computer Interaction in Online Communities.

TL;DR: The effective support of such communities depends on modeling not only the cognitive processes of individuals, but also those of the community as a whole, and the most significant and challenging of these are those that model these processes dynamically so that the community can reflect upon its own operations.